Merged Molten metal observations

I have read the comments to me and I can tell some of you have some pretty unbelievable claims.

That's what happens when you setup a "skeptics" forum with a rule that lays the burden of proof on the truthers. The debunker camp fills up with clowns who can claim anything because they have no responsibility to support their claims. So they can feel great about themselves at the truther's expense. They find a purpose in their otherwise empty life. Only a few members here are worth talking to. The rest will just throw point counter arguments at the case at hand without any real consideration of the ramifications of their statement.
 
Java Man refuses to answer any questions about his studies or qualifications,and he has the cheek to come here and argue with real engineers. The hudspeh of these truthers is breathtaking.

I don't stand behind nobility titles. I put forward my ideas and thoughts and test them. That's how all engineering came to be. If you're a engineer yourself do remember you sand on the shoulders of giants who had no doubt in questioning and investigating even if they found themselves wrong.

If you're so good as you claim then argue my posts not my credentials.
 
I don't think they delete threads unless the entire topic is against the MA.
 
So is aluminium. Re read your post if you haven't thrown your keyboard out the window that is.

The fuel doesn't eat the oxygen. The fire does.....

You think what he said was having it both ways. It isn't. One is the result of the other.

"Heads up!!" :D
 
I vote they sticky it to encourage the use of the "search" function.

Love this one:

(diff forum but very relevant)
 
I don't stand behind nobility titles. I put forward my ideas and thoughts and test them. That's how all engineering came to be. If you're a engineer yourself do remember you sand on the shoulders of giants who had no doubt in questioning and investigating even if they found themselves wrong.

If you're so good as you claim then argue my posts not my credentials.

Smooths off the shoulders?

Your posts are bare assertions so bare assertions are a good enough argument.
 
I don't stand behind nobility titles. I put forward my ideas and thoughts and test them. That's how all engineering came to be. If you're a engineer yourself do remember you sand on the shoulders of giants who had no doubt in questioning and investigating even if they found themselves wrong.

If you're so good as you claim then argue my posts not my credentials.

I will leave that to the engineers. So you have no qualifications. If you're such a red hot thinker you would have found yourself wrong by now. Carry on.
 
Smooths off the shoulders?

Your posts are bare assertions so bare assertions are a good enough argument.

Newton was making fun of Robert Hooke with the standing on the shoulders of giants crack.
 
That's what happens when you setup a "skeptics" forum with a rule that lays the burden of proof on the truthers. The debunker camp fills up with clowns who can claim anything because they have no responsibility to support their claims. So they can feel great about themselves at the truther's expense. They find a purpose in their otherwise empty life. Only a few members here are worth talking to. The rest will just throw point counter arguments at the case at hand without any real consideration of the ramifications of their statement.

Now that is funny. You are accusing an unknown number of people of mass murder with no evidence. Consider the ramifications of that. How's the draft coming along and do you reveal the names of the perpetrators? My life is far from empty,I play in three bands. I have no time to sit in a basement and make up inane theories. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
Java Man, would you mind explaining to me, a layperson, just how that aluminum in those aircraft "burned up"?
 

Back
Top Bottom