• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

why Nuclear Physics cannot be entirelly correct

RobDegraves said:
I'm calling this one a troll.

It's got all the hallmarks of a deliberate troll.

1. Willfully and deliberately ignorant of current physics.

2. He deliberately ignores attempts to draw him out into any kind of proof or qualifications.

3. He constantly baits with pseudo scientific terms.

4. He does not respond to challenges.

5. He punctuates his arguments with insults and caps in order to start further outrage.

It's a troll.
Click to expand...

But how can he be a troll, he uses so many smilies?

Oh, wait. . .
 
RobDegraves said:
OK...

1.

No.. I think you are a troll. Also, from what I can tell, you have not proven anything. If you have... where did you publish it? Or do you just intend to blather on here forever accomplishing nothing?

2.

It has been demonstrated several times in this thread that you don't know what you are talking about. However, you will continue to argue that you are right because if you don't.... you might not get all this nice attention.

3.

Sigh... first of all, you might want to learn to spell. Secondly you have not responded to any of the requests to show your actual knowledge of physics or qualifications despite numerous demands. I am sure you will have some blather about the inherent truth of your statements being the only qualification you need.... and indeed that would be acceptable if you had anything genuine to say. Again... why not publish? No one here thinks that you have any credibility.... so why stay if you are not a troll?

4.

And the incessant use of caps and big red letters? All the hallmark of the crank and/or troll.

5.

I'd be delighted to find out that cold fusion works.

Here's the caveat....

It has to work and so far... it doesn't.


Prove that it does instead of wasting everyone's time.... unless time wasting is what you intend.

In summary... you are a troll.
Click to expand...
:)
In summary, is a troll somebody who exhibits scientific evidences and coherent arguments which prove that current theories are wrong ?
Yes?
Then ok, I'm a troll.
But it does not change the content of the evidences and arguments used by me.
 
pedrone said:
:)
In summary, is a troll somebody who exhibits scientific evidences and coherent arguments which prove that current theories are wrong ?
Yes?
Then ok, I'm a troll.
But it does not change the content of the evidences and arguments used by me.
Click to expand...

You're a troll for saying misleading things over and over again in an attempt to get people to respond to you, because thats what gives you jollies. It takes all sorts, one born every minute etc.
 
pedrone said:
Originally Posted by RobDegraves View Post
3. He constantly baits with pseudo scientific terms.

Show me at least one
Click to expand...
RobDegraves,
I realize that you purposely jumped over this my response in your reply.
Perhaps you dont know the difference between science and pseudoscience, so you are not able to point out any pseudo scientific term in my arguments.

But if you dont know the difference between science and pseudo science, than your claim that I'm a troll makes no sense.
:D
So, I challenge you to show me at least one pseudo scientific term used by me.

If you do not respond to my challange, I'll state that you're a troll
:)
 
dafydd said:
I don't if he is a troll,but he is certainly not a teacher. I don't believe him.
Click to expand...
You dont need to believe me, because I am not a priest.

You have only to analyse my arguments and the scientific facts exhibited by me.
 
pedrone said:
:)
In summary, is a troll somebody who exhibits scientific evidences and coherent arguments which prove that current theories are wrong ?
Yes?
Then ok, I'm a troll.
But it does not change the content of the evidences and arguments used by me.
Click to expand...

You have not provided any evidence,just ignorant rants in a variety of fonts and colours.
 
pedrone said:
You dont need to believe me, because I am not a priest.

You have only to analyse my arguments and the scientific facts exhibited by me.
Click to expand...

Look up the word facts in a dictionary,you appear to have the wrong definition. So you are not a teacher,is that what you mean?
 
pedrone said:
RobDegraves,
I realize that you purposely jumped over this my response in your reply.
Perhaps you dont know the difference between science and pseudoscience, so you are not able to point out any pseudo scientific term in my arguments.

But if you dont know the difference between science and pseudo science, than your claim that I'm a troll makes no sense.
:D
So, I challenge you to show me at least one pseudo scientific term used by me.

If you do not respond to my challange, I'll state that you're a troll
:)
Click to expand...

The problem is not the terms,it is the way you use them and the fact that real physicists have pointed out your errors,but you ignore them. Does it ever enter your head that you may be wrong about this?
 
If you do not respond to my challange, I'll state that you're a troll
Click to expand...

No one cares what you state anymore. You have no credibility left.

Ergo...

My question to you is... why are you here?

What purpose could it possibly serve to come to a skeptic's forum and spout your fringe (to be kind) theory?

You are not publishing it.

You are not researching it.

You are accomplishing nothing except annoying the few people who were nice enough to actually try and respond intelligently to you.


Therefore... your sole purpose can only be trolling.

Quod erat demonstrandum.
 
RobDegraves said:
No one cares what you state anymore. You have no credibility left.

Ergo...

My question to you is... why are you here?

What purpose could it possibly serve to come to a skeptic's forum and spout your fringe (to be kind) theory?

You are not publishing it.

You are not researching it.

You are accomplishing nothing except annoying the few people who were nice enough to actually try and respond intelligently to you.


Therefore... your sole purpose can only be trolling.

Quod erat demonstrandum.
Click to expand...
Next troll please!
 
dafydd said:
Next troll please!
Click to expand...
:)
Next troll is Yukawa.
Soon we will analyse his stupid model of neutron, which violates the energy-mass conservation.

Actually Yukawa's neutron should be used to explain the Perpetual Motion machines, since his theory violates the energy-mass conservation
:D:D:
 
pedrone said:
:)
Next troll is Yukawa.
Soon we will analyse his stupid model of neutron, which violates the energy-mass conservation.

Actually Yukawa's neutron should be used to explain the Perpetual Motion machines, since his theory violates the energy-mass conservation
:D:D:
Click to expand...

There are no perpetual motion machines,Yukawa was a genius,you will talk crap about his model instead of analyzing it. Where did you study physics and what are your qualifications? Show me the math which proves that Yukawa's model violates energy=mass conservation. Betcha you can't.
 
I shudder at the idea of a prof who would fail a simple physics exam that was based solely on definitions alone...
 
pedrone said:
:)
In summary, is a troll somebody who exhibits scientific evidences and coherent arguments which prove that current theories are wrong ?
Click to expand...

That's not what you're doing. You may think you are, but considering how many crackpots with no real knowledge of science exist who THINK they have science by the balls, you'll excuse me if I remain unimpressed with your display of intellectual acumen so far.
 
Belz... said:
That's not what you're doing. You may think you are, but considering how many crackpots with no real knowledge of science exist who THINK they have science by the balls, you'll excuse me if I remain unimpressed with your display of intellectual acumen so far.
Click to expand...

Pedrone must realize that he is just the latest in a long line of posters who thought that they were smarter than Einstein,Dirac,Heisenberg,Bohr and Feynman all rolled into one. They all vanished back into obscurity and so far none has won a Nobel prize. Nothing new here.
 
dafydd said:
Pedrone must realize that he is just the latest in a long line of posters who thought that they were smarter than Einstein,Dirac,Heisenberg,Bohr and Feynman all rolled into one. They all vanished back into obscurity and so far none has won a Nobel prize. Nothing new here.
Click to expand...

I still wonder why Christophera hasn't got around to proving that the WTC towers had a concrete core...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom