Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clayton Moore said:
Why don't the Pentagon videos clearly show a plane?


Enrico Manieri - Henry62
.
Translated and adapted by Paolo Attivissimo with the author's permission.

WTF? One verbose, I'm guessing, Italian guy analyzes 5 or so frames of a video and explains why no plane was seen?

Over 80 security videos confiscated and Enrico and the debunkers, with a straight faces, tell us it was mechanically impossible to capture the approaching plane in flight?
Click to expand...
the security video is 1 frame a second, the plane is moving at 800 feet per-second. The security camera is a poor fish-eye like lens. Good luck.

Why would security cameras catch a plane, they are aimed at people, where people walk not at some obscure vector into the sky. Good luck
 
TruthersLie said:
That never gets old to me... it always brings a smile to my face... I think that we need to set up a fund so that when the NWO take out Gage, we manage to put that on his headstone.
Click to expand...

This always made me wonder if Gage believes those little paper and foam architectural models had the same exact scaled down structural integrity as the full size completed versions.
 
Clayton Moore said:
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7
Click to expand...
You listed people who have delusions, and no evidence. Feel free to take your list to the police, to the world court, to CBS/NBC/ABC/FOX/MSNBC/BBC, etc and save us all from the fraud of liars you listed.

AE911Truth 1400 dolts have zero, count them, zero scientific evaluations. Sorry, but they are void of evidence, and have nothing, zip, as in the null set. Feel free at anytime to post Gage's evidence. Gage is making money off of gullible people with a fake movement, and no real goal past taking in hundreds of thousand of dollars in donations and earning a living. The only conspiracy on 911 issues is fraud and one form of capitalism.
 
Clayton Moore said:
I'll believe the 1,474 professional Architects and Engineers. Thank you very much. Their scientific evaluation is correct to me.
Even the information published by NIST contradicts government assertions.

Maybe you can, LOL, provide debunker groups with comparative credentials.

Good luck with that.




MilitaryOfficersfor911Trut
Scientistsfor911Truth
FireFightersfor911Truth
Scholarsfor911Truth
Pilotsfor911Truth
Lawyersfor911Truth


AE911Truth
RememberBuilding7
Click to expand...

Wow with all that support I'm sure a new investigation will be launched any day now.
 
Hey, you're back. Any comment/thoughts on the 85 videos and the "missing" trillions now? You told us to Google.
 
Weird - I still see the deleted post too.

femr2, I know that you'd rather annoy than convince, but if you'd like the latter, try starting more of your sentences with a subject. It's just easier to read that way. Less smarmy.
 
Björn Toulouse said:
You are right. You'd think that someone who has been a lurking member here for nearly 3 years now would have seen those responses coming.
Click to expand...
Clayton Moore said:
You really flatter yourself.
Click to expand...


That response doesn't make any sense. Help me out here. Are you implying that Björn Toulouse was wrong to assume that a lurker of 3 years might learn some things before posting, or is he wrong in assuming that you were a lurker?
 
carlitos said:
Weird - I still see the deleted post too.

femr2, I know that you'd rather annoy than convince, but if you'd like the latter, try starting more of your sentences with a subject. It's just easier to read that way. Less smarmy.
Click to expand...

I was wondering why he writes his sentences backwards.
 
femr2 said:
Ho, ho, ho. 82 replies. The self-styled *debunkers* sure do love pointless banter

Brought this to mind, within an external discussion.

It's a question for self-styled *debunkers*. Not posed by me, but seems apt here...
Originally Posted by @The911Forum
If you think the official explanation is sufficiently correct, and that people should move on because there's nothing to see here, why do you spend 25 hours a day on message boards posting the same thing over and over again for years? Wouldn't it be most advantageous to ignore nutters in order to make them go away, a la Flat and/or Hollow Earthers?
Click to expand...

What motivates you to dedicate your life to debunking the same nonsense repeatedly when your employer provides you with an internet connection to do your job, not spread your message? No job?
Made me laugh.
Click to expand...
I'm a NWO contractor - I get paid in accordance with the number and quality of my posts. If I don't post, I don't eat. Someone's gotta do it.

P.S. I originally applied to be a "luminescence upright repositioning technician" but I was over qualified.

(I'm sure there's a thread for NWO job titles in there somewhere)
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
That response doesn't make any sense. Help me out here. Are you implying that Björn Toulouse was wrong to assume that a lurker of 3 years might learn some things before posting, or is he wrong in assuming that you were a lurker?
Click to expand...


I just can't believe this guy signed up 3 years ago and then at 0813 DST today came charging onto the forum without having first lurked a little, telling us to google something that could have been found here already with JREF's search function.

The missing trillions point is so obviously debunked because the reference to it can be traced to an earlier time than 9/10/01. I would just like Mr. Moore to either acknowledge that or say it is a lie. So far he has ignored it.
 
Björn Toulouse said:
I just can't believe this guy signed up 3 years ago and then at 0813 DST today came charging onto the forum without having first lurked a little, telling us to google something that could have been found here already with JREF's search function.

The missing trillions point is so obviously debunked because the reference to it can be traced to an earlier time than 9/10/01. I would just like Mr. Moore to either acknowledge that or say it is a lie. So far he has ignored it.
Click to expand...

I figured by the simpleness of your responses you may have never used google and that anything of substance from your posts would a longer shot than three steel framed buildings and their contents being pulverized into dust and the US air defense system circumvented 4 times on the same day.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Bill smith's presentation of this quote in a forum dedicated to the discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories is a textbook example of one of the standard 9/11 truther strawman arguments. It rests on the assumption that there is no difference between rejecting the specific allegation that the 9/11 attacks were planned and executed by elements within the US Government, and rejecting the general assertion that some governments at some times are corrupt. The aim is to portray as naive and self-deluded those who question the truther account of events with the same level of skepticism that they question the vastly more widely understood account of events, and find that the former is contradicted by, where the latter is supported by, any and all the available evidence.

Dave
Click to expand...

Actually, elements outside of the U.S. government utilized the power of a few highly placed individuals in the U.S. government with Cheney and Rumsfeld at the helm.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom