Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

[EventHorizon]

You do not need to consider my qualifications to debunk my work,

One of the first truthful statements you have posted. Your "work" debunks itself.

So do you have a response to The Platypus's comments at post #1569?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Me thinks that Meh thinks that 9/11 was another "Mission: Impossible" movie that 19 radical muslims with ideas of becoming martyrs and recieving 72 virgins when they enter "Heaven" because he doesn't want other ethnic groups blaming his people for what they've been doing for thousands of years. Well history has a funny way of telling the truth, especially when archaeologist dig up the past from the bones of his ancestors and artifacts from his people.

 

[mehmetin]

This is just a small slice of you using the word "impossible" to handwave away all reality. Yet in an attempt to support your bizarre inconsistent delusions, what do you have the nerve to try and use.

Suddenly nothing is impossible???

To be able to make any investigation the first step is being able to make the difference between possible and impossible theories. With such huge attacks like 9/11 and the number of disinformation/confusion making agents, if you are not strong enough to make the difference between possible/not realistic/impossible theories, you are unable to make any investigation.

When you remove all impossible theories, the remaining stuff could only be the truth.

 

[Sideroxylon]

To be able to make any investigation the first step is being able to make the difference between possible and impossible theories. With such huge attacks like 9/11 and the number of disinformation/confusion making agents, if you are not strong enough to make the difference between possible/not realistic/impossible theories, you are unable to make any investigation.

When you remove all impossible theories, the remaining stuff could only be the truth.

Of course distinguishing information coming from disinformation agents is easy; it's anything that contradicts your fantasy. Problem is, it makes falsification a little impossible so if by chance you were completely wrong about this, Mehmet, you would never be able to find out. Not that it matters because it is such a comforting fantasy that Muslims could not have committed such a horrible crime.

 

[Sideroxylon]

When you remove all impossible theories, the remaining stuff could only be the truth.

You are a regular Sherlock Holmes.

 

[mehmetin]

In (mostly) the words of the great fictional detective Sherlock Holmes, "When you have eliminated the impossible hand waved alternatives as impossible, whatever remains you wish were true, however improbable, must be the truth".

That's Sideroxylon's investigation method.

 

[DGM]

When you remove all impossible theories, the remaining stuff could only be the truth.

Like installing remote control systems in constantly used commercial aircraft and faking airfone calls from flight attendants? Or how about planting explosives in towers with bomb sniffing dogs (I notice you didn't address the fact the dogs were still there).

 

[NoahFence]

meh - have you ever seen a W2 or any tax document from a "disinformation agent"?

 

[Sideroxylon]

That's Sideroxylon's investigation method.

Nice playground retort. Only problem is that I am not the one making the big claims. You are the one who created a thread describing yourself as a researcher and, lets face it, your investigations and arguments have been shown severely wanting.

 

[Andy_Ross]

Or how about planting explosives in towers with bomb sniffing dogs (I notice you didn't address the fact the dogs were still there).

Well, the dog had a cold that day.

 

[NoahFence]

Must have been Cheney's dog.

 

[DGM]

Well, the dog had a cold that day.

Must have been Cheney's dog.

 

[Sideroxylon]

Like installing remote control systems in constantly used commercial aircraft and faking airfone calls from flight attendants? Or how about planting explosives in towers with bomb sniffing dogs (I notice you didn't address the fact the dogs were still there).

This is exactly what he is doing, along with hand waving reasonable explanations as impossible, as The Platypus so neatly illustrated.

 

[mehmetin]

Originally Posted by mehmetin
I explained that, see in the thread, and : Prepared and packed explosives anre introduced into the lifts, and from there they are placed at the required places. Nothing is impossible.

Aha! That explains why none of the elevator passengers survived!

... Oh, wait: http://www.usatoday.com/news/sept11/2002-09-04-elevator-usat_x.htm

You link speak about people inside the elevators before the collapse. So it's not related to the explosives.

May be you speak about the protection of the explosives from impact and fire? People who prepared the explosives, knew that there will be plane impact and fire. So they also included the required fire protection into the explosives. At first, their place was mechanically very well protected, between two columns. There are other fire protection, such as metallic package.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

You link speak about people inside the elevators before the collapse. So it's not related to the explosives.

May be you speak about the protection of the explosives from impact and fire? People who prepared the explosives, knew that there will be plane impact and fire. So they also included the required fire protection into the explosives. At first, their place was mechanically very well protected, between two columns. There are other fire protection, such as metallic package.

That's the most insane & stupid post I've ever read.

 

[mehmetin]

To all members: As a Muslim researcher, I came here to challenge the most Jewish and official story supporters’ forum. After 40 pages and 1594 posts, it appears that none was able to debunk the main conclusions of my work:

- The timeline of the hijacks shows that the hijacks were successive, like one team controlling one plane at a time, starting the next hijack minutes before the precedent impact. Such hijacks could not be made by 4 different teams inside each plane; the team of the next plane can not know the situation of the precedent plane; their action can not be linked to the precedent impact.

- The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a B757. It was smaller with about 95ft wingspan, which is consistent with a B737-200/300/400.

- The twin towers were demolished by radio controlled conventional explosives placed on key positions accessible from the lifts' shafts. That install of the explosives can be made during two nights of week end.

All strong evidences are consistent with these conclusions. And that proves that Muslims are NOT involved in the attack of 9/11/2001.

Now, I feel my work finished. In those 1594 posts, there were the following relevant arguments from you:
1- The automatic control system should not be installed in the nose of the plane, but it must be installed in the technical rooms under the cockpit.
2- For the 41 minutes take off delay of UA93, I must also consider the number of landings in Newark airport.

Those arguments do not change the conclusions of my work; but I promise to check them. And I will probably post the conclusions here.

None of you was able to explain How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make successive hijacks as explained here up; every hijack beginning only minutes before the impact of the precedent plane. You denied too much, refused to see the succession, ... but never explained.

By that, I let you count the number of insults you have told in those posts; everybody deserves his own insults.

You got too much difficult in arguing against the truth; you preferred the easy deny and insulting!

I have no more time to waste. I finally leave. You can reach me by personal mail only mehmet at peace911 dot org.

 

[Jackanory]

To all members: As a Muslim researcher, I came here to challenge the most Jewish and official story supporters’ forum. After 40 pages and 1594 posts, it appears that none was able to debunk the main conclusions of my work:

- The timeline of the hijacks shows that the hijacks were successive, like one team controlling one plane at a time, starting the next hijack minutes before the precedent impact. Such hijacks could not be made by 4 different teams inside each plane; the team of the next plane can not know the situation of the precedent plane; their action can not be linked to the precedent impact.

- The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a B757. It was smaller with about 95ft wingspan, which is consistent with a B737-200/300/400.

- The twin towers were demolished by radio controlled conventional explosives placed on key positions accessible from the lifts' shafts. That install of the explosives can be made during two nights of week end.

All strong evidences are consistent with these conclusions. And that proves that Muslims are NOT involved in the attack of 9/11/2001.

Now, I feel my work finished. In those 1594 posts, there were the following relevant arguments from you:
1- The automatic control system should not be installed in the nose of the plane, but it must be installed in the technical rooms under the cockpit.
2- For the 41 minutes take off delay of UA93, I must also consider the number of landings in Newark airport.

Those arguments do not change the conclusions of my work; but I promise to check them. And I will probably post the conclusions here.

None of you was able to explain How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make successive hijacks as explained here up; every hijack beginning only minutes before the impact of the precedent plane. You denied too much, refused to see the succession, ... but never explained.

By that, I let you count the number of insults you have told in those posts; everybody deserves his own insults.

You got too much difficult in arguing against the truth; you preferred the easy deny and insulting!

I have no more time to waste. I finally leave. You can reach me by personal mail only mehmet at peace911 dot org.

Run Forest run.........................................................

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Meh, 19 radical muslims were involved in the 9/11 Attacks. Nothing in your power can't change that.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Run Forest run.........................................................

Forrest Gump: That day, for no particular reason, I decided to go for a little run. So I ran to the end of the road. And when I got there, I thought maybe I'd run to the end of town. And when I got there, I thought maybe I'd just run across Greenbow County. And I figured, since I run this far, maybe I'd just run across the great state of Alabama. And that's what I did. I ran clear across Alabama. For no particular reason I just kept on going. I ran clear to the ocean. And when I got there, I figured, since I'd gone this far, I might as well turn around, just keep on going. When I got to another ocean, I figured, since I'd gone this far, I might as well just turn back, keep right on going.

 

[EventHorizon]

To all members: As a Muslim researcher, I came here to challenge the most Jewish and official story supporters’ forum. After 40 pages and 1594 posts, it appears that none was able to debunk the main conclusions of my work:

- The timeline of the hijacks shows that the hijacks were successive, like one team controlling one plane at a time, starting the next hijack minutes before the precedent impact. Such hijacks could not be made by 4 different teams inside each plane; the team of the next plane can not know the situation of the precedent plane; their action can not be linked to the precedent impact.

- The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a B757.It was smaller with about 95ft wingspan, which is consistent with a B737-200/300/400.

- The twin towers were demolished by radio controlled conventional explosives placed on key positions accessible from the lifts' shafts. That install of the explosives can be made during two nights of week end.

All strong evidences are consistent with these conclusions. And that proves that Muslims are NOT involved in the attack of 9/11/2001.

Now, I feel my work finished. In those 1594 posts, there were the following relevant arguments from you:
1- The automatic control system should not be installed in the nose of the plane, but it must be installed in the technical rooms under the cockpit.
2- For the 41 minutes take off delay of UA93, I must also consider the number of landings in Newark airport.

Those arguments do not change the conclusions of my work; but I promise to check them. And I will probably post the conclusions here.

None of you was able to explain How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make successive hijacks as explained here up; every hijack beginning only minutes before the impact of the precedent plane. You denied too much, refused to see the succession, ... but never explained.

By that, I let you count the number of insults you have told in those posts; everybody deserves his own insults.

You got too much difficult in arguing against the truth; you preferred the easy deny and insulting!

I have no more time to waste. I finally leave. You can reach me by personal mail only mehmet at peace911 dot org.

Everything in bold is a complete lie. How do you sleep at night?