Hi misteratunta,
unfortunetely I have no time right now to answer all of your points, but I'm sure someone will do it very soon and in the most firm and polite way. You'll see that the list is nothing more than a bunch of lies and/or innacuracies or misinterpreted deails.
Not my points, points of an idiot on the Elizabeth Vargas boards on facebook. I've already had a stab at a retort, but if someone could help me elaborate before I post that would be great!
* the DNA of Raffaele Sollecito on Meredith’s bra-clasp in her locked bedroom - and what of the DNA of the unidentified other people found on it? Are they therefore suspects also?
* the almost-entire naked footprint of Raffaele on a bathmat that in *no way* fits that of the other male in this case – Rudy Guede - it doesn't fit Raffael's foot any more than it fit's Rudy's
* the fact that Raffaele’s own father blew their alibi that they were together in Raffaele’s flat at the time of the killing with indisputable telephone records - care to cite a source for this and explain what it means?
* the DNA of Meredith Kercher on the knife in Raffaele’s flat which Raffaele himself sought to explain as having been from accidentally “pricking” Meredith’s hand in his written diary despite the fact Meredith had never been to his flat (confirmed by Amanda Knox); - watch this space on that one. If this were accurate and indisputable then nobody would be supporting Knox
* the correlation of where Meredith’s phones were found to the location of Raffaele Sollecito and Rudy Guedes’s flats; - the route where they were found was between Meredith's flat and Rudy's flat. That Raffaele's flat was also nearby is irrelevant and this point is a non-point
* the computer records which show that no-one was at Raffaele’s computer during the time of the murder despite him claiming he was using that computer - that's funny, I thought the hard disk was fried before any such evidence could be finally concluded
* Amanda’s DNA mixed with Meredith Kercher’s in five different places just feet from Meredith’s body - she lived in the same flat, and this line is deliberately misleading - it was feet away from Meredith's body THROUGH A DOOR AND A WALL
* the utterly inexplicable computer records the morning after the murder starting at 5.32 am and including multiple file creations and interactions thereafter all during a time that Raffaele and Amanda insist they were asleep until 10.30am - Amanda was at her own flat at 10:30am so I find it strange that she would claim to have been asleep. Did she sleepwalk? Seriously, who is writing this stuff?
* the separate witnesses who testified on oath that Amanda and Raffaele were at the square 40 metres from the girls’ cottage on the evening of the murder and the fact that Amanda was seen at a convenience store at 7.45am the next morning, again while she said she was in bed; - Who we talking about here, Curatolo the drug using homeless guy who couldn't remember what night it was and doesn't know why he is in prison? Or the guy who said he met her uncle and that she had a gap in her teeth? The guy they threw the olives at? Did someone just include this section as filler to pad this nonsense out?
* the accusation of a completely innocent man by Amanda Knox - did the accusation of his totally innocent family members make Gerry Conlon guilty?
* the fact that when Amanda Knox rang Meredith’s mobile telephones, ostensibly to check on the “missing” Meredith, she did so for just three seconds - registering the call but making no effort to allow the phone to be answered in the real world - this is a lie, a verifiable lie
* the knife-fetish of Raffaele Sollecito and his formal disciplinary punishment for watching animal porn at his university – so far from the wholesome image portrayed; - another out and out lie
* the fact that claimed multi-year kick-boxer Raffaele apparently couldn’t break down a flimsy door to Meredith’s room when he and Amanda were at the flat the morning after the murder but the first people in the flat with the police who weren’t martial artists could; - Kick boxer? Multi year? And this is known because he wrote Favourite Sport: Kickboxing on his WAYNE profile? Where is the evidence he ever took one single class, let alone was a "multi year kickboxer"? And since when did kickboxing make anyone an expert in kicking down doors? Try to use a kickboxing kick on a door and you'll get a broken foot
* the extensive hard drug use of Sollecito as told on by Amanda Knox; As told on by Amanda Knox? Hard drug use? Lie. Cite please. You can't just write the stuff without backing it up and then walk away thinking nobody will notice. There is no evidence whatsoever that Raffaele was abusing hard drugs, and if he was it is very far from evidence that he is a murderer. Hey, some of you guys are even saying Curatolo is still a reliable witness and he was whacked out on H. How come he never murdered anyone from that park bench, if your logic is so flawless?
* the fact that Amanda knew details of the body and the wounds despite not being in line of sight of the body when it was discovered - she was told where Meredith was and that her throat had been slit in a car on the way to the police station, this is a matter of public fact
* the lies of Knox on the witness stand in July 2009 about how their drug intake that night (“one joint”) is totally contradicted by Sollecito’s own contemporaneous diary; - straws, clutching at. Who cares how many spliffs she smoked? What good would it do her to lie about it?
* the fact that after a late evening’s questioning, Knox wrote a 2,900 word email home which painstakingly details what she said happened that evening and the morning after that looks *highly* like someone committing to memory, at 3.30 in the morning, an extensive alibi; - only to someone who wants it to look HIGHLY like someone committing to a memory an alibi. To anyone else it looks like someone writing a detailed message home.
* the fact that both Amanda and Raffaele both said they would give up smoking dope for life in their prison diaries despite having apparently nothing to regret - because idiots who know nothing whatsoever about drugs cite their dope smoking as a black mark against them and it made them more inclined to think they were murderers. Not hard to see why they might regret that
* the fact that when Rudy Guede was arrested, Raffaele Sollecito didn’t celebrate the “true” perpetrator being arrested (which surely would have seen him released) but worried in his diary that a man whom he said he didn’t know would “make up strange things” about him despite him just being one person in a city of over 160,000 people; - because he was the one who was all over the papers as being the murderer, out of 160000 other people
* the fact that both an occupant of the cottage and the police instantly recognised the cottage had not been burgled but had been the subject of a staged break-in where glass was *on top* of apparently disturbed clothes - the glass on top of clothes was contradicted in court upon closer inspection of photographs of the crime scene, and what makes the police experts on stage break ins, you reckon they saw a lot of staged break ins around that way? Would you take the word of someone who had so few qualifications that they decided to be a cop over the word of a ballistics expert?
* that Knox and Sollecito both suggested each other might have committed the crime and Sollecito TO THIS DATE does not agree Knox stayed in his flat all the night in question; lie, he accepted it in court
* the bizarre behaviour of both of them for days after the crime; - sigh...
* the fact that cellphone records show Knox did not stay in Sollecito’s flat but had left the flat at a time which is completely coincidental with Guede’s corroborated presence near the girl’s flat earlier in the evening; LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE! How can anyone be asked to explain a completely fabricated nonsense?
* the fact that Amanda Knox’s table lamp was found in the locked room of Meredith Kercher in a position that suggested it had been used to examine for fine details of the murder scene in a clean up - oh my God...is it 2009 again?
* the unbelievable series of changing stories made up by the defendants after their versions became challenged; Knox’s inexplicable reaction to being shown the knife drawer at the girl’s cottage where she ended up physically shaking and hitting her head - oh sorry, you got me. She must have done it.
