bikerdruid
Philosopher
Bashing liberals, of course.
it's much broader than that....
bashing anyone that is not a christian right wing whacko.
Bashing liberals, of course.
Here's the highly irrelevant factoid that I take away from mhaze's perplexing post: The term Palin Doctrine was used prior to the fanboy cited in the OP.What exactly is the purpose of a doctrine that has no content?
Here's the highly irrelevant factoid that I take away from mhaze's perplexing post: The term Palin Doctrine was used prior to the fanboy cited in the OP.
True, the presentation of this factoid followed a circuitous route that might confound readers unfamiliar with mhaze's opaque posting style. Bear in mind though, the contortions that are required in order to carry Palin's water on a skeptical forum are demanding indeed. Sometimes bailing out is the most viable option.
I don't understand his point at all. Is there an actual 'Palin Doctrine' and he won't tell us or is he arguing the the phrase 'palin doctrine' is in fact an actual combination of two words that has been combined since 2008?
No, it wasn't detailed in your misrepresentation. Let's pull the entire paragraph from your linky shall we?
On Libya she said "It would have been different." Remarking that the U.S. has a tradition of not criticizing the president's foreign policy on "foreign soil," she continued, "Certainly, there would have been more decisiveness, more commitment to those that are freedom fighters, that they know that America is on their side.
You are only repeating the misrepresentation provided by your sources (CNN) and their bias of course. Your linky does not state the specific actions.
So let's dig a bit deeper shall we? Uhh...well...if "deeper" means actually looking at the Sun article. Then we find...
The former GOP vice presidential candidate was being interviewed on February 23rd on national television by Sean Hannity on a range of issues. On the Libya crisis, she proposed a no-fly zone to protect the armed and un-armed opposition to the Qaddafi regime.
http://www.nysun.com/opinion/palin-d...oes-her/87263/
Obaby is now following the Palin Doctrine?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
However, the Palin Doctrine according to Palin is ambiguous indeed, shifting like the desert sand in whatever direction Obama isn't going at the moment, real or imagined.I don't know why you're asking this. Just go back to the original posts. It's pretty unambiguous ... That's the Palin Doctrine, according to mhaze.
Sarah Palin said:I haven't heard the president say that we are at war. And that's why I too am not knowing if we use the term intervention, do we use war, do we use a squirmish, what is it?
A "gotcha" question? One about the foreign policy of the president she (and we) had good reason to believe she would eventually succeed?I also feel that it was intended as a gotcha question.
I'm having trouble seeing any problem with those two statements. You've presented them as if they didn't jive with each other, is that it?
do we use a squirmish
Now that little comment would get you immediately butt-kicked off the bar stool down here. Get real, we have a dozen dialects at least here in the US and some of us can talk a number of them passably well. That's not counting the mashups of english and spanish or english and chinese.Jibe, not jive (unless they are indeed dancing together)
Verb
jibe (third-person singular simple present jibes, present participle jibing, simple past and past participle jibed)
(intransitive, nautical) To perform a jibe
(intransitive) To agree.
That explanation doesn't jibe with the facts.
(transitive, nautical) To cause to execute a jibe
[edit]Usage notes
"jive" and "jibe" are frequently used interchangeably in the U.S. to indicate the concept "to agree or accord". However, while one recent dictionary accepts this usage, most sources consider this an error.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jibe
I think she gotta point, squirming around sort of is what we doing over there. We ain't doing skirmishes.Squirmish for skirmish makes me squirmish.
And personally, I think that "misunderestimate" is a great word.
I'm a fan of refudiate. Seriously.
So am I and a lot of people trying to understand US involvement in Libya. It's as if cops went into a neighborhood infested with gangs and started shooting into houses and groups of people indiscriminately but arrested no one. Brain dead use of deadly force is not what Palin suggested and defies any logical analysis, unless the intent is to make the US look brain dead and ineffectual.Palin is trying to understand US involvement in Libya -- involvement that she called for, up until it actually happened -- and is confused as to what it should be called...
Your acumen and sharp analysis covering the requisite misdirection needs additional facts to qualify as pious liberal progressive continuation of the smear Palin meme, does it not?Palin is trying to understand US involvement in Libya -- involvement that she called for, up until it actually happened -- and is confused as to what it should be called...
Can't let Donald get all the attention for craziness. Here we see Sarah Palin once again showing that she cannot let go of a grudge. She had to make an unprovoked snipe at Katie Couric as she leaves CBS News. Sarah cannot forgive Couric for being such a horrible liberal media person who dared to ask her what magazines she read. Even for a politician, Palin's capacity for blaming others for her own shortcomings is nothing short of breathtaking.
I have no idea what this word salad means.Your acumen and sharp analysis covering the requisite misdirection needs additional facts to qualify as pious liberal progressive continuation of the smear Palin meme, does it not?
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=10150165452518435
Wait....
So everything you said was a lie? Notwithstanding whether that is the gold standard of aspiration of you seek, yet agreeing with the general precept that you should be all you can be...
....being caught flat footed and blindsided by the wicked one shot huntress of the Northern moose is embarrassing, isn't it?
![]()