• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Palin Doctrine :)

varwoche said:
Palin is trying to understand US involvement in Libya -- involvement that she called for, up until it actually happened -- and is confused as to what it should be called...
Click to expand...
Sure, no problem.

Here is your misrepresentation of Palin, your attempt to make her seem confused, and your lie that she called for anything resembling the silliness being evidenced by Obaby currently.

I understand it's difficult to understand these things.

That's why I provided the link to Palin's current commentary, so you could comment based on facts, instead of things you made up and rather poorly, from your own imagination.
 
mhaze said:
Sure, no problem.

Here is your misrepresentation of Palin, your attempt to make her seem confused, and your lie that she called for anything resembling the silliness being evidenced by Obaby currently.

I understand it's difficult to understand these things.

That's why I provided the link to Palin's current commentary, so you could comment based on facts, instead of things you made up and rather poorly, from your own imagination.
Click to expand...

What exactly did Palin call for and how, specifically, is it different from what the coalition including the US is doing?
 
mhaze said:
Sure, no problem.

Here is your misrepresentation of Palin, your attempt to make her seem confused, and your lie that she called for anything resembling the silliness being evidenced by Obaby currently.
Click to expand...
Please review post #63, in which it is made as clear as the day is long (in Wasilla in the dead of summer) that Palin has been talking out both sides of her mouth.

That you disagree with me is really silly given the obviousness of Palin's bs, though not unexpected seeing as you're an unabashed fanboy. But calling me a liar? What a piece of work.
 
varwoche said:
.....That you disagree with me is really silly given the obviousness of <<<< my >>>> bs...
Click to expand...

Correcting your statement.

Want to continue this nonsense?

I'm trying to help. That is, at helping you do better at smear artistry. But it's a thankless job.

;)
 
See, carrying Palin's water requires so many contortions that the I Hope Nobody Scrolls Up debate technique is inevitable.

Here mhaze, try again:
Sarah Palin in February said:
NATO and our allies should look at establishing a no-fly zone so Libyan air forces cannot continue slaughtering the Libyan people. We should not be afraid of freedom, especially when it comes to people suffering under a brutal enemy of America. link
Click to expand...

Sarah Palin in March said:
I think there's a lot of confusion as it pertains to our foreign policy in Libya right now, and that's a frustrating thing for Americans, certainly frustrating thing for our troops. Our troops deserve better.

Susteren: Is it a failure on our part if we turn over command and control to someone else, to NATO or to France or whatever, and Qaddafi is still in power? Is that a failure on our part?
Palin: America will have failed. link
Click to expand...

And allow me to add:
Palin in Feb said:
NATO and our allies should look at establishing a no-fly zone so Libyan air forces cannot continue slaughtering the Libyan people, once the US removes Qaddafi from power using actions that I am not enumerating at this time.
Click to expand...
 
varwoche said:
See, carrying Palin's water requires so many contortions that the I Hope Nobody Scrolls Up debate technique is inevitable. ....
Click to expand...
Where exactly is the contortion and the confusion in the quoted statements from Palin that you list?

Frankly, I consider the confusion to be in your mind, not hers.

But let's hear out your point of view. Point to the issues in the statements you just listed, because they seem to make sense to me. I'm just wondering if well, you know, the Palin-hate-mantra may not have deluded you into seeing something that just is not there.

It would not be the first time. Oh and by the way, an absence of hatred and vitriol toward a public figure does not make one a fanboy of said public figure, except in the world of delusion due to that hatred and vitriol. Which is really the subject of your thread here.
 
Last edited:
bikerdruid said:
great dodge...:rolleyes:
it was a straight forward and honest question.
"do you seriously and honestly believe that palin is presidential material?"
Click to expand...
Yes indeed, your straight forwardness and deviation from the OP and subsequent thread wanderings is refreshing. Sort of like, "Are you a card carrying communist?" where it is implied that you are already, a communist, and it would be revealed whether you have a card attesting to such OR are the alternative, a secret agent of the communists.

Well, are you?

:)
 
mhaze said:
You mean the policy that Obaby has picked up and followed, right? That she said should be done a couple weeks ago before countless thousands of people were slaughtered?

I'd say it's a term she earned and should be given some respect for.

Wait....the loathing and hate of radical left would never allow that...
Click to expand...
How is that a "doctrine"? If what Palin said is a doctrine, then Dear Abby has a doctrine every day in the paper.
 
mhaze said:
Where exactly is the contortion and the confusion in the quoted statements from Palin that you list?

Frankly, I consider the confusion to be in your mind, not hers.

But let's hear out your point of view. Point to the issues in the statements you just listed, because they seem to make sense to me. I'm just wondering if well, you know, the Palin-hate-mantra may not have deluded you into seeing something that just is not there.

It would not be the first time. Oh and by the way, an absence of hatred and vitriol toward a public figure does not make one a fanboy of said public figure, except in the world of delusion due to that hatred and vitriol. Which is really the subject of your thread here.
Click to expand...
In Feb she said NATO and our allies should establish the no-fly zone. In March, she said that if NATO and our allies establish the no-fly zone, America will have failed. So either she wants America to fail, or she just flip-flopped on her posi.....


OH I GET IT! I see what her doctrine is now!
 
Dorian Gray said:
How is that a "doctrine"? If what Palin said is a doctrine, then Dear Abby has a doctrine every day in the paper.
Click to expand...
Only if some said so, and that concept of there being a Dear Abby Doctrine propagated in popular culture.

Dorian Gray said:
In Feb she said NATO and our allies should establish the no-fly zone. In March, she said that if NATO and our allies establish the no-fly zone, America will have failed. So either she wants America to fail, or she just flip-flopped on her posi.....


OH I GET IT! I see what her doctrine is now!
Click to expand...
Oh, gosh wrong I was.

Edited by Gaspode: 
Removed breach of Rule 12


You left out something your fellow progressive just MENTIONED so it is an OBVIOUS LIE BY OMISSION:

....and Qaddafi is still in power? Is that a failure on our part?
Palin: America will have failed.

:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom