American astrologer Predicted Japan Earthquake

[Little 10 Toes]

American mundane astrologer and astrometeorologist Theodore White at his website - Global Astrology predicted the date, place and magnitude of the Japan Earthquake before it happened.

See the evidence for yourself.

It's all over Google as "Theodore White astrologer predicted Japan Quake."

On his March 4, 2011 edition he writes:

How come his "blog" is dated march 11?

 

[Twiler]

He named specific dates in a two-month period. There are 12 months in a year, so he could not obviously name any dates outside of the year and he predicted the regions and magnitudes. The Japan earthquake happened on March 11. He named the country, the magnitude and the date.

How is that that "some reasonably bright grade school kid couldn't have predicted with greater accuracy using a popular web site and a pocket calculator."

How can it be that "he absolutely did not" and "not accurate" when he did predict the Japan quake before it happened and on the very day it happened?

"During the entire month of March 2011 we can expect to hear of powerful earthquakes along the 'Ring of Fire.'

In March, look first to Asia for seismic action in the northern hemisphere - China and Japan, then to the Philippines, along to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, to British Columbia, Canada, then to California in the United States, stretching down to Mexico and into South America.

With the global transits at hand, there are sure to be powerful, large magnitude earthquakes in the months of March and April.

My astrological calculations show a 88.9% rating for significant seismic activity between 6.6 to 7.9+ in magnitude.

There are additional planetary configuration signals I've interpreted that show even stronger quakes by scale - 8.9 to 9.2 in magnitude. Some people will not believe me, but transits are well within astrological red-zone warning range.

Significant Dates

*March 10,11
*March 18,19,20,21
March 28
April 1,2,3
*April 4
*April 6,7
*April 9,10
*April 15
*April 16,17,18
April 24

So, in what sense are (or were) these particular dates significant?

 

[dafydd]

He named specific dates in a two-month period. There are 12 months in a year, so he could not obviously name any dates outside of the year and he predicted the regions and magnitudes. The Japan earthquake happened on March 11. He named the country, the magnitude and the date.

How is that that "some reasonably bright grade school kid couldn't have predicted with greater accuracy using a popular web site and a pocket calculator."

How can it be that "he absolutely did not" and "not accurate" when he did predict the Japan quake before it happened and on the very day it happened?

"During the entire month of March 2011 we can expect to hear of powerful earthquakes along the 'Ring of Fire.'

In March, look first to Asia for seismic action in the northern hemisphere - China and Japan, then to the Philippines, along to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, to British Columbia, Canada, then to California in the United States, stretching down to Mexico and into South America.

With the global transits at hand, there are sure to be powerful, large magnitude earthquakes in the months of March and April.

My astrological calculations show a 88.9% rating for significant seismic activity between 6.6 to 7.9+ in magnitude.

There are additional planetary configuration signals I've interpreted that show even stronger quakes by scale - 8.9 to 9.2 in magnitude. Some people will not believe me, but transits are well within astrological red-zone warning range.

Significant Dates

*March 10,11
*March 18,19,20,21
March 28
April 1,2,3
*April 4
*April 6,7
*April 9,10
*April 15
*April 16,17,18
April 24

We are not getting through to you. Show me where he predicted the exact time,date and place,not just chance of there being an earthquake in an earthquake zone over a two month period. Failing that,show me a prediction he has made about an event that has yet to occur,or even make one yourself so we can test your powers. Bet you won't. That is a prediction that will come true.

 

[beren]

"During the entire month of March 2011 we can expect to hear of powerful earthquakes along the 'Ring of Fire.'

In March, look first to Asia for seismic action in the northern hemisphere - China and Japan, then to the Philippines, along to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, to British Columbia, Canada, then to California in the United States, stretching down to Mexico and into South America.

With the global transits at hand, there are sure to be powerful, large magnitude earthquakes in the months of March and April.

My astrological calculations show a 88.9% rating for significant seismic activity between 6.6 to 7.9+ in magnitude.

There are additional planetary configuration signals I've interpreted that show even stronger quakes by scale - 8.9 to 9.2 in magnitude. Some people will not believe me, but transits are well within astrological red-zone warning range.

Significant Dates

*March 10,11
*March 18,19,20,21
March 28
April 1,2,3
*April 4
*April 6,7
*April 9,10
*April 15
*April 16,17,18
April 24

Let us play a game.

You pick any 20 days out of a 2 month period in the future. Use any criteria you want to pick the 20 days. Throw dice. Throw darts. Draw a pattern on a calendar, whatever.

Because there will be a quake between 6.6 and 9.2 in magnitude somewhere "along the 'Ring of Fire.' " or in "China and Japan, then to the Philippines, along to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, to British Columbia, Canada, then to California in the United States, stretching down to Mexico and into South America" on one of the days you select.

I would bet money on it.

 

[jsfisher]

Let us play a game.

You pick any 20 days out of a 2 month period in the future. Use any criteria you want to pick the 20 days. Throw dice. Throw darts. Draw a pattern on a calendar, whatever.

Because there will be a quake between 6.6 and 9.2 in magnitude somewhere "along the 'Ring of Fire.' " or in "China and Japan, then to the Philippines, along to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, to British Columbia, Canada, then to California in the United States, stretching down to Mexico and into South America" on one of the days you select.

I would bet money on it.

Only one earthquake? At least make it an interesting bet.

 

[GeeMack]

He named specific dates in a two-month period.

No. He named several dates from March 10 to April 24 inclusive. That time frame includes 46 dates, not two months. You're wrong.

There are 12 months in a year, so he could not obviously name any dates outside of the year and he predicted the regions and magnitudes. The Japan earthquake happened on March 11. He named the country, [...]

No. He named Asia, China, Japan, the Philippines, the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, British Columbia, Canada, California, Mexico, and South America. That would be pretty much the entire world except Africa, Australia, Europe, and Antarctica. Glancing at a world atlas and making a rough estimate, it looks like he covered about half of all the land mass on Earth. So you're wrong again.

[...] the magnitude [...]

No. He mentioned seismic activity "between 6.6 to 7.9+". That's anything of magnitude 6.6 and over, a range which would include over 100 quakes in an average year, 8 every month, 2 each week, all year, every year. So you're wrong for the third time.

[...] and the date.

No. He named 20 dates in a span of 46 dates. He named dates that would cover 59.5% of all the possible time within that span. He absolutely did not designate a single date. His named time frame spanned a period of 1128 hours, and his possible "prediction" included 672 hours of that time, 59.5%. So in the first four sentences of your reply you were flat out wrong, completely and totally wrong, four times. 100%.

Like I said, he was successful in duping a bunch of believers, willfully ignorant folks, stupid people, people who can't do math, and gullible people. But making a specific prediction including date, location, and magnitude? Not even close. It would be a completely dishonest misrepresentation of reality to suggest he did that.

 

[dafydd]

Like I said, he was successful in duping a bunch of believers, willfully ignorant folks, stupid people, people who can't do math, and gullible people. But making a specific prediction including date, location, and magnitude? Not even close. It would be a completely dishonest misrepresentation of reality to suggest he did that.

Astrologers do not do reality.

 

[GeeMack]

Astrologers do not do reality.

Understood.

 

[Astro Teacher]

No. He named several dates from March 10 to April 24 inclusive. That time frame includes 46 dates, not two months. You're wrong.




No. He named Asia, China, Japan, the Philippines, the Aleutian Islands, Alaska, British Columbia, Canada, California, Mexico, and South America. That would be pretty much the entire world except Africa, Australia, Europe, and Antarctica. Glancing at a world atlas and making a rough estimate, it looks like he covered about half of all the land mass on Earth. So you're wrong again.




No. He mentioned seismic activity "between 6.6 to 7.9+". That's anything of magnitude 6.6 and over, a range which would include over 100 quakes in an average year, 8 every month, 2 each week, all year, every year. So you're wrong for the third time.




No. He named 20 dates in a span of 46 dates. He named dates that would cover 59.5% of all the possible time within that span. He absolutely did not designate a single date. His named time frame spanned a period of 1128 hours, and his possible "prediction" included 672 hours of that time, 59.5%. So in the first four sentences of your reply you were flat out wrong, completely and totally wrong, four times. 100%.

Like I said, he was successful in duping a bunch of believers, willfully ignorant folks, stupid people, people who can't do math, and gullible people. But making a specific prediction including date, location, and magnitude? Not even close. It would be a completely dishonest misrepresentation of reality to suggest he did that.

He forecasted the Japan quake, named the date, country and magnitude.

The earthquake happened where he said to look first and he named the day. He was right.

Whether you want to believe it isn't even relevant.

And Gee Mack, just how can he be "wrong" about the dates he named in April because April is not even here yet? Oh, I forgot, you want him to be wrong so you can then stay ignorant. Must be a very comfortable place for you, huh? The only person doing any "duping" here is you.

 

[Sledge]

He forecasted the Japan quake, named the date, country and magnitude.

Where?

 

[Oualawouzou]

Ho, ho, I want to try too!

He forecasted the Japan quake, named the date,

No, he named a whole bunch of dates.

country

No, he named pretty much every single country that is part of the "ring of fire".

and magnitude.

No, he named a large range of magnitudes.

To recap: he named a whole bunch of dates, a whole bunch of countries that are rocked by earthquakes every day of the year and a range of magnitudes that are reached several times per week.

You honestly don't see the problem?

 

[GeeMack]

He forecasted the Japan quake, named the date, country and magnitude.

He named half the world as a possible location for an earthquake. He suggested a range of magnitude for a quake that is likely to happen a couple times a week, every week. He offered an arbitrary time boundary and covered his guess to the tune of almost 60% of all the possible time within that span. Your above comment is definitively a lie.

 

[Astro Teacher]

Ho, ho, I want to try too!



No, he named a whole bunch of dates.



No, he named pretty much every single country that is part of the "ring of fire".



No, he named a large range of magnitudes.

To recap: he named a whole bunch of dates, a whole bunch of countries that are rocked by earthquakes every day of the year and a range of magnitudes that are reached several times per week.

You honestly don't see the problem?

"A whole bunch of dates?" Wow, what English you use.

Read what he wrote: he said there was going to be increased seismic activity in March and April, named the region of the world, the countries, the specific dates and the general time period too and that is exactly what we are seeing.

Honestly you don't see your problem? Oh, I forgot - you don't want to see at all.

Check, got it.

 

[Stellafane]

He predicted the earthquakes in China and Japan, with the dates and magnitudes before the quakes happened. If that's not enough for anyone then you're not a skeptic at all, just faking being a skeptic.

Whether or not this is enough for me -- or anyone else -- is rather immaterial, when you stop to think about it. Because if indeed Mr. White has the power he claims he does, then his next predication could save thousands of lives, as his Japanese prediction could have done had it been heeded. Thus, whatever you may think of us so-called "skeptics," it really is incumbant of you to bring to our attention any prediction Mr. White currently has on his site that hasn't come true yet.

Perhaps you may be tempted to answer "go check it out for yourself" or something of that sort, but I'm afraid that really wouldn't reflect very well on you. Because if you truly believe in Mr. White's ability, then in a way you also share Mr. White's power to save lives, because you can identify those who are in danger. It's too late for the victims in Japan, so repeatedly bringing up that example at this point is something of an exercise in futility. But predicting the next disaster before it happens -- indeed, it would be irresponsible for someone who really believes this can be done not to disseminate this information as widely as possible.

So once again, I must ask: Can you point us to a before-the-fact prediction currently on Mr. White's site that is specific, unambiguous, and unlikely? Not to be overly melodramatic, but quite literally lives may depend on it -- if Mr. White has the ability he claims (and in which you apparently believe).

 

[Astro Teacher]

He named half the world as a possible location for an earthquake. He suggested a range of magnitude for a quake that is likely to happen a couple times a week, every week. He offered an arbitrary time boundary and covered his ass to the tune of almost 60% of all the possible time within that span. Your above comment is definitively a lie.

A possible location? I guess you didn't hear about the Japan quake he predicted.

Is Japan half the world? I don't think so.

Then you say he is wrong about April and April isn't here yet. Are you smoking your shoes Gee Mack?

 

[Oualawouzou]

"A whole bunch of dates?" Wow, what English you use.

English as a second language will do that to you.

Read what he wrote: he said there was going to be increased seismic activity in March and April, named the region of the world, the countries, the specific dates and the general time period too and that is exactly what we are seeing.

Would you consider his prediction a "hit" if the Japan quake hadn't occurred, but any one of these other (fictitious) quakes had?

Chile, March 18th, magnitude 7,0
BC, March 10th, magnitude 6,6
Philippines, March 11th, magnitude 8,1
Japan, March 20th, magnitude 7,3
Mexico, March 21st, magnitude 6,9
China, March 19th, magnitude 7,8
International waters, March 10th, magnitude 9,1

 

[beren]

A possible location? I guess you didn't hear about the Japan quake he predicted.

Link or quote for that claim? You have not provded evidence of this.

Is Japan half the world? I don't think so.

He didn't predict Japan.
He predicted half the world.
Your own link proves that.

 

[GeeMack]

A possible location? I guess you didn't hear about the Japan quake he predicted.

Nobody has offered any evidence in this thread to support the claim that he predicted an earthquake in Japan. To suggest that such a claim has been substantiated here would be a lie.

 

[Tricky]

I would like to state that I am also a psychic. I will prove it:


Someday in the future, there will be a hurricane in Florida.

I will go you one better:

"It will happen between the months of June and October."

 

[ynot]

White also predicts an earthquake in California in April and gave specific dates. I don't see what is "vague" and "ambiguous" about that.

What’s not ambiguous about “an earthquake" having “dates”? To be unambiguous AN earthquake prediction needs to have only ONE date.

Simply prove White has made an unambiguous and accurate prediction by answering the following . . .

(1) What day in April?
(2) Where in California?
(3) What magnitude will the quake be?

These questions need to be answered before the "predicted" quake occurs of course.