Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

What exactly is it that you're doing?

Ergo.

Simple question.
Were explosions reported in the caracas tower?
Were explosions reported in the meridian plaza fire?
were explosions reported in the one new york plaza fire?

Yes to all three.

There are about 20 things in regular office buildings which explode when on fire.

Can you eliminate ANY of them?

didn't think so.

Once you figure out prepositions, maybe you can move up to similes.
 
Amazingly incompetent reply.

tfk said:
Yeah, actually many of them said this. Indirectly.
Source.

Apparently you're confused when somebody constructs their own chain of logic.

My source is the logic that I've laid out in front of you.

I've watched dozens of videos in which FFs mention explosions, and are advertised by twoofers as being "proof of explosives".

tfk said:
And NOT ONE time, not ONCE, "We've got bombs going off up here! Pull everyone out & get the bomb squad here quick!"
Um, wrong.

As someone recently requested ... "source"?

Feel free to cite quotations from FFs who noted explosions AND then called for the bomb squad.

Please provide the number of these, compared to the total number that mentioned explosions. Both of these numbers should be readily available from a word search of the Oral History project transcriptions. Of course, if MacQueen had been competent & unbiased, this info would have appeared in his papers.

Finally, "beliefs of the FFs" are just that: "beliefs". Aka: impressions, feelings, suspicions, gut feelings. All of which happened under extreme circumstances on 9/11.

The REALITY is determined from evidence, not "impressions".

How many times were the bomb squad called out? I've heard of a couple. In every case (with which I am aware), those calls turned out to be false alarms.

Reality trumps beliefs and impressions.
 
Finally, "beliefs of the FFs" are just that: "beliefs". Aka: impressions, feelings, suspicions, gut feelings. All of which happened under extreme circumstances on 9/11.

The REALITY is determined from evidence, not "impressions".

How many times were the bomb squad called out? I've heard of a couple. In every case (with which I am aware), those calls turned out to be false alarms.

Reality trumps beliefs and impressions.

But remember, he's not arguing that any of it necessarily "proves" controlled demolition. He's just arguing that these statements are "on the record"! :D

...whatever relevance that's supposed to have to anything.:p
 
Amazingly incompetent reply.


Apparently you're confused when somebody constructs their own chain of logic.

My source is the logic that I've laid out in front of you.

Oooo...somebody's been taking magician lessons.

I've watched dozens of videos in which FFs mention explosions, and are advertised by twoofers as being "proof of explosives".

I don't care what you've watched. If you can't formulate a coherent argument that uses factual, sourced information, then your pontifications are little more than stale air.

Feel free to cite quotations from FFs who noted explosions AND then called for the bomb squad.

"Hello, Bomb Squad? Where are you?........We're down at the World Trade Center... What's that?... World Trade Center.... No, not a fire, a terrorist attack!....Turn on your TV .... Yes.... Yes. We think there may be bombs and were wondering if you could come down!....Um, well, as soon as you can? If you're not too busy...."
 
But remember, he's not arguing that any of it necessarily "proves" controlled demolition.

That's right. I'm not arguing that it proves demolition. Good for you. A little, tiny light seems to be coming on...
 
That's right. I'm not arguing that it proves demolition. Good for you. A little, tiny light seems to be coming on...
Right, if you string enough "maybes" and "ifs" and "coulds" together and ignore all the actual evidence you get your typical bat-guano crazy conspiracy theory.
 
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110295.PDF

C. FENYO

At that point a debate began to rage because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges. We had really no concept of the damage on the east side of 2 World Trade Center at that point, and at that point many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down.



http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110288.PDF

W. REYNOLDS

A. ....I ran into a Battalion Chief. I don't know who he was. I said to him, I said, "Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right?" He said, "No."

Q. You're talking about the north tower now, right?

A. Before the north tower fell. He said, "No." I said, "Why not? They blew up the other one." I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, "If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one." He said, "No, they're not." I said, "Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out." Because I had felt there were hundreds of firemen who died in the first tower and thousands of people. He said, "I'm just the Battalion Chief. I can't order that." I remember looking at the radio on him and I said, "You got a *********** radio and you got a *********** mouth. Use the *********** things. Empty this *********** building." Again he said, "I'm just a Battalion Chief. I can't do that."

So I walked back by the water. We were all basically just somewhat in visual sight of each other, us and 22 Truck, some of the guys from 22 Truck. I had known, at that time, that all of the guys of the 22 truck had gotten out. We were walking around very numb. I knew I was in shock, but there was nothing I could do about it. So eventually this other chief came back and
said, "They are evacuating this tower."
 
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110295.PDF

C. FENYO

At that point a debate began to rage because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges. We had really no concept of the damage on the east side of 2 World Trade Center at that point, and at that point many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade, and officers were gathering companies together and the officers were debating whether or not to go immediately back in or to see what was going to happen with 1 World Trade at that point. The debate ended pretty quickly because 1 World Trade came down.



http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110288.PDF

W. REYNOLDS

A. ....I ran into a Battalion Chief. I don't know who he was. I said to him, I said, "Chief, they're evacuating the other building; right?" He said, "No."

Q. You're talking about the north tower now, right?

A. Before the north tower fell. He said, "No." I said, "Why not? They blew up the other one." I thought they blew it up with a bomb. I said, "If they blew up the one, you know they're gonna blow up the other one." He said, "No, they're not." I said, "Well, you gotta tell them to evacuate it, because it's gonna fall down and you gotta get the guys out." Because I had felt there were hundreds of firemen who died in the first tower and thousands of people. He said, "I'm just the Battalion Chief. I can't order that." I remember looking at the radio on him and I said, "You got a *********** radio and you got a *********** mouth. Use the *********** things. Empty this *********** building." Again he said, "I'm just a Battalion Chief. I can't do that."

So I walked back by the water. We were all basically just somewhat in visual sight of each other, us and 22 Truck, some of the guys from 22 Truck. I had known, at that time, that all of the guys of the 22 truck had gotten out. We were walking around very numb. I knew I was in shock, but there was nothing I could do about it. So eventually this other chief came back and
said, "They are evacuating this tower."

I have bolded the important parts that you seem to have missed.

Do you understand those sentences?

Do I need to explain it to you?
 
Tri.

don't bother. He doesn't understand the difference between into and onto, he doesn't understand what ABOUT means, nor can he tell the difference between essentially vs actually.

Similes and figures of speech are wayyyyyyy beyone his ability to understand.
 
I have bolded the important parts that you seem to have missed.

Do you understand those sentences?

Do I need to explain it to you?

Yes, Trifor, we know that the firefighters were providing their testimonies after the event. After the official story was soundly in place, and their impressions were reinterpreted for them.

Those quotes were merely to prove the bedunkers wrong about firefighters' impressions. Again.
 
"Hello, Bomb Squad? Where are you?........We're down at the World Trade Center... What's that?... World Trade Center.... No, not a fire, a terrorist attack!....Turn on your TV .... Yes.... Yes. We think there may be bombs and were wondering if you could come down!....Um, well, as soon as you can? If you're not too busy...."


At what time was that?

And...(I shudder to think) can you source that beyond just typing into a message board?

A cursory glance would tell me that quote is even before the 2nd plane hit. Just a guess though. If so, it would pretty much eliminate it as being anecdotal evidence for explosions. Just more quote - mining.
 

Back
Top Bottom