...
Actually, I answered to all logical questions and explained all.
Only in your vail imagination. Your "explanations" are the blind result of someone who knows too little about too many things. They fail to consider many facts, and thus you overlook a million possibilities, declare as impossible some ordinary every-day occurrences that everybody with a bit of experience in modern life has personally experienced, and declare as possible things that are in fact impossible.
Furthermore, you have not provided real material evidence for most of your claims.
In those 1164 posts, you were often accusing me, not my arguments. Any way, you had two true arguments:
We had many many more, you just hand-wave them.
- The place of installation of the automated servos is not in the nose, but it's under the cickpit.
You have no material evidence for this. None. It is pure imagination.
- I should also consider the landing flights in Newark airport.
Absolutely. There are many more things you have not considered but should. Such as how RADAR works, how aircraft maintenance works, how pilots fly planes, how planbes are built, how remote-control systems are developed, how FDRs are analysed, what the properties of explosives are and how they are used, ect etc etc.
By reverse, you ignored especially these arguments :
1- The planes were controlled by one central team using high-tech.
2- The plane that hit the Pentagon was not a B757.
3- The twin towers were demolished by explosives.
[/QUOTE]
LIAR.
Especially these arguments have been addressed by pretty much everyone here. Everybody has pointed out that you
1- Provided no material evidence for central control by one team and deny all the evidence that points to all planes controlled by a team of hijackers (4 teams total, acting independently after boarding)
2- Provided no material evidence for any other proposition, but deny the massive amounts of evidence for a 757
#3- Provided no material evidence for the use of any eplosives at the twin towers, much less their demolition, and deny the many indepent scientific studies that show how the massive fires can indeed easily lead to collapse