IDB87
Illuminator
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 4,022
uh huh.....yeaaahhhhh...
![]()
No idea what Hamas actual role as Governorate of Gaza is?
Well you should have just said so!
uh huh.....yeaaahhhhh...
![]()
whatever Israel chooses to allow them to be responsible for.Whose responsibilities entail...?
what stops Israel from walking into gaza today? maybe stay around for a few hours and leave? answer is ....nothing. They could do it today, tomorrow...anytime. You would still be happy to say not occupied. Overflying?....no problems.
yes...thats the chant you guys have chosen....except even if there were a few combat boots in there you would still be happy to award the "non occupied" award.
what stops Israel from walking into gaza today? maybe stay around for a few hours and leave? answer is ....nothing. They could do it today, tomorrow...anytime. You would still be happy to say not occupied. Overflying?....no problems.
You may have expected that Israels moving of troops to the borders would have convinced the world that they are not in control of what happens to Gaza.....well, it certainly was enough for those that habitually stand to attention and salute israeli actions to stand to attention and salute.
Now please explain to everyone how you standing to attention, saluting and chanting the "no boots" chant makes any difference to the occupation status of Gaza?
whatever Israel chooses to allow them to be responsible for.
Your definition of "occupation" presented in this post defines the United States, Russia, China, and several other states as occupation forces. Just as a simple example, how does your definition above affect the "occupied" status of Cuba, or indeed, Mexico or Canada?yes...thats the chant you guys have chosen....except even if there were a few combat boots in there you would still be happy to award the "non occupied" award.
what stops Israel from walking into gaza today? maybe stay around for a few hours and leave? answer is ....nothing. They could do it today, tomorrow...anytime. You would still be happy to say not occupied. Overflying?....no problems. Wildcat says even if Israel was to enter parts of Gaza to seal off the border with Egypt it would still be not occupied.
You may have expected that Israels moving of troops to the borders would have convinced the world that they are not in control of what happens to Gaza.....well, it certainly was enough for those that habitually stand to attention and salute israeli actions to stand to attention and salute.
Now please explain to everyone how you standing to attention, saluting and chanting the "no boots" chant makes any difference to the occupation status of Gaza?
They're lackeys of the Jews, of course.
And yes, there's actually people on this very forum who claim this.
yes...thats the chant you guys have chosen....except even if there were a few combat boots in there you would still be happy to award the "non occupied" award.
what stops Israel from walking into gaza today? maybe stay around for a few hours and leave? answer is ....nothing. They could do it today, tomorrow...anytime. You would still be happy to say not occupied. Overflying?....no problems. Wildcat says even if Israel was to enter parts of Gaza to seal off the border with Egypt it would still be not occupied.
You may have expected that Israels moving of troops to the borders would have convinced the world that they are not in control of what happens to Gaza.....well, it certainly was enough for those that habitually stand to attention and salute israeli actions to stand to attention and salute.
Now please explain to everyone how you standing to attention, saluting and chanting the "no boots" chant makes any difference to the occupation status of Gaza?
well of course you are not going to quibble about it because it defines the fatal flaw in your argument.... Revealing your position for what it is....a partisan apologist.
I'm not going to quibble over hypothetical scenarios. The MB doesn't seem poised to take over Egypt at the moment.
Just as a simple example, how does your definition above affect the "occupied" status of Cuba, or indeed, Mexico or Canada?
What would non-occupation look like to you, Fool?
err...umm........you ARE aware that all of those supposed "occupations" are due to signed agreements between us and them, right?
It would look like Israel not determining what happens to Gaza. A little bit like Israels non occupation of Lebanon....or syria...or egypt...or australia....What would non-occupation look like to you, Fool?
It would look like Israel not determining what happens to Gaza. A little bit like Israels non occupation of Lebanon....or syria...or egypt...or australia....
Israel is regarded as the occupying power.....cry if you like
Why should I cry? You look like the one throwing a tantrum.
He's never heard of the Oslo Accords
The lack of Israeli combat boots on Gaza soil might be a clue.
Why should I cry? You look like the one throwing a tantrum.
what stops Israel from walking into gaza today? maybe stay around for a few hours and leave? answer is ....nothing. They could do it today, tomorrow...anytime. You would still be happy to say not occupied. Overflying?....no problems. Wildcat says even if Israel was to enter parts of Gaza to seal off the border with Egypt it would still be not occupied.
err...umm........you ARE aware that all of those supposed "occupations" are due to signed agreements between us and them, right?
please Mortimer, please tell us that you are fully aware that America's control of Guantanamo Bay was due to a long-ago signed treaty.
I'm gonna cry if you say "no".