South Tower 81st floor filled with thermite?

Anders Lindman said:
One trick debunkers use is to find some flaws in videos and then say that the whole video is crazy. And then when there are errors in the official report, then the debunkers say: human error, everybody makes mistakes. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

If conspiracy kooks weren't trying to spread bunk in the first place there would be no need for a de-bunk-er, hence the term...:rolleyes:

People think videos from conspiracy kooks are crazy because they make all sorts crazy unsupported nonsensical claims...:rolleyes:

Conspiracy kooks won't admit to any of the massive and often mistakes they make, acting like they know everything about everything better than anyone...:rolleyes:

Conspiracy kooks think even the slightest error in any of the investigations means that everyone is lying or in on it and want yet another investigation thinking that by some magical luck reality will change in their favor...:rolleyes:

Conspiracy kooks think anything "official" or from qualified experts, isn't true, acting as if "official" is a bad word, but then see raving uneducated idiots with youtube videos as infallible and believe anything they say without question...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Craig4 said:
Why would anymore put thermite into buildings when plane was going to crash into it?
Click to expand...

Because to use real planes would mean a lot of risks. The boyz and galz who planned the event didn't use shaky and risky strategies. And the thermite was needed to ensure that the steel would soften enough to make the collapses start at those floors.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
I wouldn't be surprised if the black boxes were inside that thing.
Click to expand...

If so, then why haven't they investigated that slab? Low budget investigation? Time constraints (after 10 years?). :rolleyes: Too difficult to take apart the slab?

P.S. One of the first things George W. Bush said (if I remember correctly) was that he had ordered a full investigation into the 9/11 attacks.
 
Anders Lindman said:
And the thermite was needed to ensure that the steel would soften enough to make the collapses start at those floors.
Click to expand...

:dl:

Seriously, dude, get a clue here. Thermite will burn intensely for a few seconds, releasing all of its energy almost at once. A brief flash of heat will not significantly weaken steel. The heat has to be present for a LOOOONG time to do any damage. Enough thermite to heat an inch of steel all the way through would have greatly ablated the surface of the steel
No such thing was found. FAIL.
 
leftysergeant said:
:dl:

Seriously, dude, get a clue here. Thermite will burn intensely for a few seconds, releasing all of its energy almost at once. A brief flash of heat will not significantly weaken steel. The heat has to be present for a LOOOONG time to do any damage. Enough thermite to heat an inch of steel all the way through would have greatly ablated the surface of the steel
No such thing was found. FAIL.
Click to expand...

I think the entire floor 81 was covered with thermite that when ignited softened virtually all the steel on that floor (both the steel in the concrete floor and the steel columns).
 
Anders Lindman said:
EXACTLY!!! Plus, that concrete slap is probably an extreme piece from Ground Zero.
Click to expand...

Methinks your sarcasm meter is broken...

Anders Lindman said:
I think the entire floor 81 was covered with thermite that when ignited softened virtually all the steel on that floor (both the steel in the concrete floor and the steel columns).
Click to expand...

And here you demonstrate you know absolutely nothing about how thermite works. Bravo; you've demonstrated a complete lack of reading comprehension!
 
Anders Lindman said:
Because to use real planes would mean a lot of risks. The boyz and galz who planned the event didn't use shaky and risky strategies. And the thermite was needed to ensure that the steel would soften enough to make the collapses start at those floors.
Click to expand...

Except that we know that planes crashed into them and there's no evidence of thermite. It sort of destroys your whole hypothesis with the fact that planes hit the buildings and there's no thermite.
 
Anders Lindman said:
I think the entire floor 81 was covered with thermite that when ignited softened virtually all the steel on that floor (both the steel in the concrete floor and the steel columns).
Click to expand...

You think this because you have no understanding of any of the topics you've expressed opinions about and you have no critical thinking skills. You're so ignorant of these topics you don't even know what would qualify as evidence. In sum you've very disrespectfully turned a national tragedy into a stupid hobby. This behavior of yours is despicable. This topic deserves better than you.
 
Anders Lindman said:
So, don't you think the slap should have been taken apart and the fragments examined?
Click to expand...

Considering the condition the fragments in that slab are likely in, I don't see that it would do anyone any good to do so, no. There's no way to ensure that someone could definitively identify any fragments of the black boxes, plus, if they were destroyed (as was likely, considering not only the speed of the plane impacts, but also the subsequent fires and the effects of millions of tons of glass, concrete, and steel crumpling to the ground from a great height), there wouldn't be any usable evidence gleaned from them. What exactly is it that you think discovering the black boxes will do, Anders? If we did find fragments, would you then admit that there WERE in fact planes that flew into the Twin Towers? And if so, why would that evidence convince you when the plane parts already found among the wreckage have not?
 
Sabrina said:
Considering the condition the fragments in that slab are likely in, I don't see that it would do anyone any good to do so, no. There's no way to ensure that someone could definitively identify any fragments of the black boxes, plus, if they were destroyed (as was likely, considering not only the speed of the plane impacts, but also the subsequent fires and the effects of millions of tons of glass, concrete, and steel crumpling to the ground from a great height), there wouldn't be any usable evidence gleaned from them. What exactly is it that you think discovering the black boxes will do, Anders? If we did find fragments, would you then admit that there WERE in fact planes that flew into the Twin Towers? And if so, why would that evidence convince you when the plane parts already found among the wreckage have not?
Click to expand...

If fragments of black boxes were found then that would strengthen the official version that there were real planes. I would still not be entirely convinced though. :D
 
Craig4 said:
You think this because you have no understanding of any of the topics you've expressed opinions about and you have no critical thinking skills. You're so ignorant of these topics you don't even know what would qualify as evidence. In sum you've very disrespectfully turned a national tragedy into a stupid hobby. This behavior of yours is despicable. This topic deserves better than you.
Click to expand...

I have have watched a few videos where thermite was burned, and it burned slowly and melted the steel. Lots of thermite would easily have made floor 81 totally sag.
 
Anders Lindman said:
If fragments of black boxes were found then that would strengthen the official version that there were real planes. I would still not be entirely convinced though. :D
Click to expand...
Then why do you bother asking for them as evidence then?

There is no way to convince someone when they have strapped some goalsposts to a pickup truck and are merrily driving about randomly.

If Anders had actually been on one of those aircraft and miraculously survived, he'd still be claiming "no planes". There just isn't any point in discussing the issue unless of course you are looking to provoke stundie material.
 
Anders Lindman said:
If fragments of black boxes were found then that would strengthen the official version that there were real planes. I would still not be entirely convinced though. :D
Click to expand...

Any sane, reasonable person can see all the other airplane wreckage, video of planes and eye-witnesses and reach the blatantly obvious conclusion that planes were used in the attacks. Your decision to be willfully ignorant is no reason to reopen any investigations.
 
Anders Lindman said:
If fragments of black boxes were found then that would strengthen the official version that there were real planes. I would still not be entirely convinced though. :D
Click to expand...

And that, my friend, to coin a phrase, is why you fail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom