My argument against materialism

Belz... said:
Stop acting like an ignorant slob. You know full well what I meant if you know how to read at all. You can't ask what something "is", only what something "does". You are unable to understand this, and there is no point to anyone trying to explain anything to you, anymore. Go away.
Click to expand...

Sorry I had the impression that you were stating that there is only 'does' not 'is', I stand corrected.

I happen to think it is worthwhile addressing what things are, we disagree.
 
punshhh said:
Well I beg to differ, the mystery remains, its just easier to see now. Unless you fall into Belz's camp where there is no is.

The QGP event either popped into existence from or in nowhere, or it occured in an already existing environment.

I would hazard a guess at the latter, as the former would present some odd questions.

So if we have a prexisting environment, surely this environment is the singularity, of "infinite" density?

This by definition is unfathomable hence the mystery remains.
Click to expand...

Your beliefs are your prerogative. I've nothing further to contribute at this point.
 
kenkoskinen said:
As I perused the discussion it appears participants are puzzled about the mystery of existence i.e. us within the universe. I can't solve all the problems but can add to the chase. Firstly, we are within the universe and so be our observations/detections. Secondly since Einstein's special theory of relativity it has been understood that time and space are interwoven. There isn't any time outside of space. Space consists of at least the three common dimensions and time is the 4th (but it's not a spatial dimension). The fact that space/time is real has been proven numerous times (see Gravity Probe A experiment and the GPS corrections to the time variable which are needed to make it work; there are many more such as the impact of cosmic rays in Earth's upper atmosphere).

The inflationary hot Big Bang Model is successful in explaining several problems about the origin of the universe but it is still incomplete. It can't successfully explain how our universe emerged or by passed the initial singularity (a point of infinite energy and zero space/time volume). It's nonsense, yet here we sit. It may well be some other explanation can account for the singularity problem.

I will be writing a paper later this year to suggest a more reasonable alternative to the big bang genesis. See my website http://antspub.com
Click to expand...

I don't agree that the emergence from the singularity is necessarily nonsense, as it may only have the appearance of being infinite from our perspective.
If it is infinite, we do have a problem.
 
PixyMisa said:
Do you understand what a singularity is?

If so, why do you think that's a meaningful question?
Click to expand...

Do physicists claim QGP originated in a singularity? I am only asking a question after reading the BBE timeline.
 
kenkoskinen said:
I will be writing a paper later this year to suggest a more reasonable alternative to the big bang genesis
Click to expand...
Based on 'Vibe Theory'?

Incidentally, you should be aware that quantum entanglement doesn't involve superluminal information transfer. Your web site suggests it 'appears' to.
 
PixyMisa said:
Do you understand what a singularity is?

If so, why do you think that is a meaningful question?
Click to expand...

I know what a singularity is, I am being presented with a cosmogenesis which is suggesting a singularity as the origin.

Should this suggestion be taken seriously?

Or is it a nonsense?
 
punshhh said:
Feel free to give an alternative explanation of where the QGP event came from.

Did it arise in a singularity or not?
Click to expand...

Buy a good book on cosmology,I am not here to fill in the huge gaps in your education.
 
punshhh said:
Sorry I had the impression that you were stating that there is only 'does' not 'is', I stand corrected.

I happen to think it is worthwhile addressing what things are, we disagree.
Click to expand...

I give up too,you never answer questions,you are either trolling or a lost cause. Goodbye.
 
punshhh said:
I know what a singularity is, I am being presented with a cosmogenesis which is suggesting a singularity as the origin.

Should this suggestion be taken seriously?

Or is it a nonsense?
Click to expand...
Okay then. What is a singularity, and why do you think that is a meaningful question?
 
dafydd said:
The true mystic never answers questions. It would be too embarrassing.
Click to expand...

Yeah, admitting you studied this crap all your life and still don't know where the bathroom is might be embarrassing.
 
tsig said:
Yeah, admitting you studied this crap all your life and still don't know where the bathroom is might be embarrassing.
Click to expand...

I studied that crap when I was younger,I believed it all,ley lines,pyramid power,aliens,the I Ching,secret Buddhist knowledge,the lot. With age came wisdom,coupled with the fact that I started to study science and actually did some research. No evidence.
 
TmoonII said:
There is also evidence that repeated questioning does not measure intellect.
Click to expand...
It may have escaped your notice that this is a discussion forum. We ask questions. In this thread they do not get answered,but we keep trying.
 
Last edited:
I enjoy the discussion indeed, sir dafydd. Yet would request balance from the questioners posts with a few bits to process ending with periods. Materialism/idealism evolves in many forms.
 
Last edited:
TmoonII said:
I enjoy the discussion indeed, sir dafydd. Yet would request balance from the questioners posts with a few bits to process ending with periods. Materialism/idealism evolves in many forms.
Click to expand...

Balance? Lots of questions and no answers does not sound like balance to me.Are we supposed to accept punshhh''s vague statements without question? Ill try you. Which forms would these be,and what bearing do they have on the real world?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom