Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

No, not at all. The weak point is the 2x4 joists, and possibly their connections (are they just toe-nailed or are brackets used?), and that is what will fail.

Exactly!

Let's bring this down to the simplest form. We place two posts such that there is an 8 foot distance between them. Use joist hangers to connect a 2X4X8' between the posts. Hang a mass at the center of the 2X4 and keep increasing this mass until one of two things happens 1) the 2X4 snaps, 2) the joist hangers fail.

Now increase the size of the posts but keep the open span the same. The mass required to cause failure will remain the same except in Ander's world where the increased post size will somehow allow a greater mass to be supported by the 2X4:rolleyes:
 
Exactly!

Let's bring this down to the simplest form. We place two posts such that there is an 8 foot distance between them. Use joist hangers to connect a 2X4X8' between the posts. Hang a mass at the center of the 2X4 and keep increasing this mass until one of two things happens 1) the 2X4 snaps, 2) the joist hangers fail.

Now increase the size of the posts but keep the open span the same. The mass required to cause failure will remain the same except in Ander's world where the increased post size will somehow allow a greater mass to be supported by the 2X4:rolleyes:

I thought 6x6 meant 6 times 6 posts. :o
 
Last edited:
I don't know who the perpetrators were, but those have done, and still are doing, the cover-up, are ordinary innocent people in key positions in all areas of society.

So you still don't know who did 9/11? So you blame ordinary, hard working, tax paying American citizens for 9/11?? You know, that I know, that you have no evidence to prove it.
 
That's one of the first messages from GWB after the 9/11 attacks. He is telling people who have to do a cover-up: "Look, we have to do a cover-up now, and that means lying to the public in the name of national security. I set an example here by telling a blatant lie publicly, and thereby showing many of you who will need to do the same that it's ok, and that you have my support and cooperation."

Evidence?
 
So you still don't know who did 9/11? So you blame ordinary, hard working, tax paying American citizens for 9/11?? You know, that I know, that you have no evidence to prove it.

How do you know that the perpetrators were American citizens? Many of them could have been, but some of them could also be from other countries.
 
Only if you have a very incomplete and unsophisticated view of how the world works. To those of us who live in reality of course your above statement is just silly nonsense.

Everybody (every real person) lives in reality. Logic. ;)
 
I thought 6x6 meant 6 times 6 posts. :o

Sorry, I thought you were up on North American construction terminology.

2X4 means 2 inches by 4 inches (actually it refers to the rough cut dimensions even though one almost never purchases rough cut lumber)

So a 6X6 is 6 inches by 6 inches and a 4X4 is 4 inches by 4 inches.

At any rate the WTC towers core column increased in size(not in number) but that had no effect on the ability of a floor pan to support a load. You characterized the floors on lower levels as being capable of supporting a greater load. That is incorrect.
 
How do you know that the perpetrators were American citizens? Many of them could have been, but some of them could also be from other countries.

Oh how original Anders, I've asked questions to you & you ask a question back. That's not how it works here! You answer my questions first then I'll answer yours.

I'm sorry folks, but Anders is taking Stupidity to a whole new level of low!
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I thought you were up on North American construction terminology.

2X4 means 2 inches by 4 inches (actually it refers to the rough cut dimensions even though one almost never purchases rough cut lumber)

So a 6X6 is 6 inches by 6 inches and a 4X4 is 4 inches by 4 inches.

At any rate the WTC towers core column increased in size(not in number) but that had no effect on the ability of a floor pan to support a load. You characterized the floors on lower levels as being capable of supporting a greater load. That is incorrect.

Ok, that may have been the case, but theoretically the floors could have been so strong that they were not the weakest 'link' and instead that the columns were the weakest link, but that was not likely the case. Still, I wonder if a sturdier support by the lower columns would make those floors able to take more weight than the higher floors. For example, the lower floors would tend less to wobble and shake.
 
Oh how original Anders, I've asked questions to you & you ask a question back. That's not how it works here! You answer my questions first then I'll answer yours.

I'm sorry folks, but Anders is taking Stupidity to a whole new level of low!

But you asked if I blamed American citizens to be the perpetrators. I don't know what nationality the perpetrators had.
 
Like flight 175 that still was flying in the air (flight-tracking monitor shown live on television) when it was supposed to have crashed?

You are incorrect. Flight 175 crashed into the World Trade Center. Here is a quote from a phone call a one Peter Hansen, a passenger made on a call from that flight. Mr. Hansen was flying with his wife and 2 1/2 year old daughter.
It's despicable that you've decided to make a stupid little hobby out of this tragedy. I wonder if you'd have the courage to tell Mr. Hansen's father to his face about your freakish little idea.
It's getting bad, Dad. A stewardess was stabbed. They seem to have knives and Mace. They said they have a bomb. It's getting very bad on the plane. Passengers are throwing up and getting sick. The plane is making jerky movements. I don't think the pilot is flying the plane. I think we are going down. I think they intend to go to Chicago or someplace and fly into a building. Don't worry, Dad. If it happens, it'll be very fast....Oh my God... oh my God, oh my God."/QUOTE]
 

Back
Top Bottom