Warring No planer factions- Shansksville and Pentagon no-planers vs WTC no planers

What evidence exists to support a conspiracy by anyone other than Al Qaida to carry out the attacks on 9/11? What evidence exists to support the conclusion that there was a cover up?

Everything in the official story sounds like fiction to me.
 
What evidence exists to support a conspiracy by anyone other than Al Qaida to carry out the attacks on 9/11? What evidence exists to support the conclusion that there was a cover up?
Everything in the official story sounds like fiction to me.

Lurkers, take note: This is how Truthers actually think.
 
I think they only could get hold of some few things like a landing gear, a part of a jet engine of wrong type and perhaps a few more items. The rest of the parts were planted afterward as a part of the cover-up.

"They" seem strangely incompetent.
 
"They" seem strangely incompetent.

Is it incompetent to get the entire U.S. government plus others to do the cover-up for them? And fool almost the entire world (at least for a fairly long time). It seems to me that their mission from the perpetrators point of view is successfully accomplished.
 
Is it incompetent to get the entire U.S. government plus others to do the cover-up for them? And fool almost the entire world (at least for a fairly long time). It seems to me that their mission from the perpetrators point of view is successfully accomplished.

I've highlighted a recurrent theme in your posts. You're welcome
 
Yeah, since I have no first-hand information, I have no real evidence. So that is to be expected.

Yea, but without real evidence, the debate simply degrades into chaos eventually, does it not? If my feelings and your feelings are diametrically opposed, and you can't provide any evidence of yours how does simply repeating your gut feelings contribute to the argument? This doesn't even touch on the fact that I am dubious of anybody being as sure as you are about anything with so little evidence to support it.
 
Last edited:
Yea, but without real evidence, the debate simply degrades into chaos eventually, does it not? If my feelings and your feelings are diametrically opposed, and you can't provide any evidence of yours how does simply repeating your gut feelings contribute to the argument? This doesn't even touch on the fact that I am dubious of anybody being as sure as you are about anything with so little evidence to support it.

My main point is that the no planes scenario is not as crazy as many people say or believe.
 
Is it incompetent to get the entire U.S. government plus others to do the cover-up for them? And fool almost the entire world (at least for a fairly long time). It seems to me that their mission from the perpetrators point of view is successfully accomplished.

How do you know the perpetrators point of view?
 
Ha! There you are mistaken. Maybe you will think I have gone hyper paranoid but I believe most 'famous' conspiracy researchers are controlled opposition, i.e. untrustworthy authorities. The moon landings are off topic, but let me just add that AIDS is a total hoax too!!! :D (Now people will maybe think I'm a complete tinfoil hat kook, but there are some serious facts supporting those claims.)

I'm not mistaken, I know that you're making yourself out to be a fool & an idiot because of what you're typing.

You think all the people here are "controlled opposition"? LMAO! Evidently you never read the U.S. Constitution where it states that people have the right to freedom of speech & freedom of the press. There isn't anything controlled in the Constitution, it's only in your perverted mindset.

AIDS isn't a hoax, people continue to die from the disease & there's plenty of evidence for that. If you manage to get AIDS, you will see that it's not a "hoax" at all. You are a tinfoil hatted kook, your posts show that you are.

Just keep running away from the real issue, that you've been caught lying, quote-mining & misrepresenting the 9/11 Families & Victims.
 
Last edited:
How do you know the perpetrators point of view?

My theory is that the perpetrators plan was to force the U.S. government to do a cover-up and in that way get huge political control and blackmail position plus automatic protection against the public. And they succeeded in accomplishing that.
 
My theory is that the perpetrators plan was to force the U.S. government to do a cover-up and in that way get huge political control and blackmail position plus automatic protection against the public. And they succeeded in accomplishing that.

You know, you admitted to everyone here that you don't know anything cause you've never researched it.

So you really don't know anything, which is why you're stretching the truth, which means you're just here to make up lies that have been debunked long ago.
 

Back
Top Bottom