Originally Posted by mehmetin
Thanks for your input. During longtime I thought what happened to the Pilots? First I thought that the control system can use non-reversible gear box making the pilots unable to stop or move the automatic movement of flight controls. But if pilots remain alive, they'll make every possible think to crash the plane into the ground, stop the engines, stop other systems, ... Then arrive the solution: the pilots should be killed.
Don't you see what you are doing there? You are starting with the assumption that there were no (Muslim) hijackers, which pretty much forces you to consider those other unwieldy (not to mention unlikely) scenarios that you outlined in the post I quoted. A responsible and dispassionate investigator (professional or amateur) must go where the evidence leads them, not begin their investigation with a foregone conclusion then attempt to awkwardly shoehorn the evidence to fit their conclusion.
No. You missed one point! When people like Meyssan questioned the attacks, I began to investigate. But that was only the Pentagon strike. The towers remained Arabs made. Then the question was : If the planes of the towers were also USA made? Is that possible? Yes, that’s possible, electronic systems are so perfect that they are able to make everything. How to decide who made the strikes, Arabs or USA?
The answer was : USA will make the strikes by setting up ONE SECRET TEAM and give them all required means to make the strikes. But that one team operation will create some difference between the Arabs made 4 team operation. What’s the difference? In one team operation the hijacks will be successive serial made, in 4 teams operation the hijacks will be parallel made. When the time graphic was made in early 2003, I knew that Arabs did not make the strikes. Still today, there is no explanation of how 4 different teams made successive hijack.
Yes, after that time of 2003, I was sure Arabs are not involved in 9/11. After that, it was proved that there were no Muslim hijackers inside the planes. This is not an assumption. This is strong and definite evidence to remove Muslims from the scenario.
By reverse, I checked every detail to explain the complete events as theya re made by USA. Every time I asked a question, the answer came very quickly. Finally I explained all events. At first I thought USA and Bush administration made the strikes. Only in mid 2007, I began to understand how big the involvement of Israelis/Zionists was. The evidence that opened the Israelis/Zionists/Jews involvement was the report that Dr. Zdenek Bazant wrote two days after the strikes.
The gassing of the pilots was one of the steps to be explained. Taking some hypothesis and checking the evidence that support it. When enough evidence was against any hypothesis, I had to search another explanation, compare to other evidences, … But when several evidences supported any hypothesis, I considered it stronger and stronger. Finally all evidence is explained and all actions are consistent. The evidences are interconnected each to other and all are consistent with the main explanation of the events.
In that case of gassing the pilots, we have these evidences:
- All 8 pilots were unable to key the hijack code. That shows they were dead extremely quickly.
- In the first plane, the pilots were dead within 16 seconds, very short. And the official story explained that as being the takeover! Do you imagine how the probability of such takeover be made exactly between two orders of the air traffic controller Pete Zalewski? We can tell almost null.
- The communications between the air space control and the pilots in both AA11 and UA175.
All those evidences need to be explained. The official story is silent about all that stuff.
Do you still think that’s starting from an assumption?
It's humiliating and disturbing when a member of one's own family/tribe/community/political party/country/religious group/etc. commits a shameful criminal act, especially if we fear that our own personal reputations might somehow be tainted by the actions of the criminal. We can all probably cite examples when something like that has happened, times when we've been ashamed to be a part of the same group that the criminal belongs to. That's a perfectly human reaction. What we must avoid doing though is committing the No true Scotsman
WP fallacy. In your case you believe that no true
Muslim would perpetrate such a large scale act of terrorism, so you are forced to conclude that the perpetrators are
not Muslims. Again, this is a perfectly human reaction, but it is not a
rational reaction.
Sorry, you are taking some assumptions about my opinion. Muslism are committing too many terror strikes in Palestine, Tchechnia, making war between themselves in Afghanistan, some extremism exists in Pakistan, … I will never support any terrorist in his actions. I can explain the reasons why the terror attack is made.
If you continue to think that my work is biased, you’ll leave the perpetrators of 9/11 free and they’ll make other terror attacks killing other Americans, other UK citizen, other Spanish people, other Europeans, other Arabs, …
What ever may claims could be, you should try to debunk my work by using scientific logical arguments. Let my origin, my faith aside, cross the border and learn to think impartially. I know it’s not easy. With all false media messages and slogans, it’s very difficult to imagine that a Muslim can be impartial. Aware of that, and that was told me by a non Muslim friend, I decided to be as much as possible true, independent, impartial.
To say that all Muslims are terrorists is absurd, but to say that no Muslims are terrorists is equally absurd. Making blanket statements about what any group (e.g., Muslim, Christian or Jew) is and is not capable of is not only wrongheaded, it has been the cause of a lot of suffering throughout history.
The history was different in different parts of the World. We should not consider the same history in all parts of the world. Yes, nationalist opinions in whole world made too much suffering. But nationalist opinions did never be enough big in Muslim world.
