mehmetin,
You know that plot you keep coyly hinting at parts of (missile guidance systems fitted to jets, voice morphing technology, planted evidence) but never explaining in detail?
Your arguments in that post are sincere, and I thanks you for your sincerity.
The details that I did not explain are included in my book; I can’t explain everything in several forums.
I do not ask you to believe me. But every detail of that scenario has been decided after long checks, interconnections with other evidences, … check the possibility, the reliability, the best manner to make it, remove all possible problems, …
Still two days ago, I found that the place where the control system was installed may not be the nose of the plane. I must check that better. I had to make such changes too many times, and every time it was a new challenge, a new problem to solve.
Sure it's an evil plan, no doubt, but do you believe that it is a good plan? Is it a sound plan with a decent chance of success?
If I have to do it, I’ll make it in such manner (but do not wrry, I’ll never do such action, it’s out of my life principles).
Remember, if you are right about the conspirators, it's not enough that the attacks themselves are successful and Muslims implicated, that's difficult enough. For the plot to be successful, it also has to remain undiscovered for well, at least during the lifetime of the conspirators, if not longer.
Technically it’s unimaginable to adapt tomahawk control system on a civil aircraft. First I designed to control system, the guidance algorithm, and finally I was thinking where to place the computer which contains the software. At that time, I became aware that a tomahawk system could easily be installed in the aircraft. That immediately solved several problems like “testing a new special software”, which itself impossible to be made for such one shot secret operation, like the reliability of the system, the ground controls, the communication with the ground, … Everything exists and used since longtime.
Even if we grant for the sake of argument that a group of (dozens?, hundreds?, thousands?) of soldiers, bureaucrats, aircraft engineers, common civilians, et al. would agree to participate in such a dastardly scheme against their fellow Americans, who in their right mind would agree to participate in such a perversely unwieldy plot?
Most of the executing team were Israelis (that’s why Israeli Spy Ring is involved). Those people are used for secret criminal operations, they’ll remain silent. That’s why the Americans who had to participate in the actions had to be Jew people related to Israel. Pete Zalewski (I doubt, but it may also be as follow: Some people told him to give two successive orders within 16 seconds, without telling him any more about the complete events, even in that case, he should be aware of his action). For the main deciders, they are all sometens people under Bush himself; Rumsfeld, Cheney, Wolfovitw, … CEO of Raytheon (company who had to make the design of the control system), some extremely rich people like Larry Silverstein, or port authority director Lewis M. Eisenberg, the secret team of Rumsfeld.
We must expect about hundreds people who participated.
Let's take a closer look at just one small part of it; your claim that the passengers on the jets were impersonated with voice morphing technology in the airphone/cell phone calls to their loved ones. Have you really thought that through? There are so many opportunities for something to go wrong with the scheme even if (and it's a big "if") the idea could work in principle. To show you just one small and simple way the scheme could have been foiled, here's a true story:
Back in the early nineties an old friend of mine got me a free airline ticket so I could go visit him. He travelled a lot on business and had more frequent flyer miles than he knew what to do with. The only catch was that he had to get the ticket under his name and I therefore had to pretend to be him when checking in at the ticket counter. You may find this very hard to believe (even I do nearly 20 years on), but I actually got away with it. In those days passengers were not expected to show any form of ID, at least not at the airport I was flying out of. As far as the airline is concerned, it was my friend, not I who flew on that flight. Now imagine for a moment that I had been flying on one of the ill-fated flights on the morning of 9/11. Further imagine that Mossad and whoever else you think was involved saw my friend's name on the passenger list and decided that he was one of the calls they were going to fake, little knowing that he isn't actually on the flight. Further imagine that they make the somber call to my friend's parents, only my friend happens to be sitting in their living room with them when the supposed goodbye call from their "son" comes through. That would be pretty strong evidence that there was more to the hijacked flight than met the eye, wouldn't it? That one small slip-up could have given the whole game away. I could name a half dozen other ways off the top of my head that would have completely messed up that part of the plan, causing the entire scheme to come crashing down like a house of cards. Why would they gamble on such an absurdly risky, convoluted (not to mention breathtakingly evil) scheme, when the smallest slip-up could mean the gallows for them and their cohorts?
This problem was solved with the wire tap of the passengers made by the “Israeli Spy Ring” during the weeks before the events to be sure the intended people were the right persons who will board the planes.
Any way, you understood that the reliability of the operation is too much important and that makes some working methods to extremely sure!
But you are right, some problems happened, some mistakes happened, but they got minor consequences. For example:
- The seconds plane which has not been adjusted about PID parameters, it was nearly missing its target.
- Mark Bingham speaking to his mother and telling : “Mrs. Bingham, this is your son Tom Bingham”. Can you imagine a people speaking to his mother like that? But this simply solwed by telling “Mark is always speaking in that official way!”
- Mineta’s testimony before the commission. Just removed from the final report.
I've told you before that you believe in your Mossad conspiracy theory because you need to believe it to such an extent that it's virtually impossible to believe anything else at this point. This has blinded you to the utterly absurd theory you are clinging to.
You can definitely forget that. Before mid 2007, I was unaware that Israelis made the strikes. When I studied Bazant’s case I began to think about Israelis.
It's like someone who pulls into a parking space in a shopping center multi-level parking garage. He leaves the car to do some shopping and comes back an hour later to find his car is missing. He walks up one level in the garage and finds his car in the same relative space he thought he had parked it, only one level higher than he remembered. Believing himself to have a perfect memory, the man will not allow himself to even consider the possibility that he might have simply misremembered where he parked his car.
He checks his car and finds no sign of forced entry and his odometer remains unchanged from when he left the car. Since he is certain of his infallibility, he is forced to conclude that the car was broken into by professionals and that the odometer was possibly tampered with or that the car was towed to the other space as some sort of odd prank. He questions passersby to see if anyone had witnessed the car being moved and everyone he asks insists they saw nothing of the kind. One woman even insists that the car never moved because she saw him pull in to the space. From this our man assumes that the woman and the other witnesses are part of the conspiracy to make him look foolish. The man then goes to the store security team and demands to view their security tapes of the parking garage during the time in question. The Guards show him the tape and the man sees that sure enough, the car wasn't moved or tampered with in any way while the man was in the store. Again, though, the man is sure of his memory and so assumes the guards must be "in on it", too and have tampered with the tape. In the space of a half hour the man has constructed a vast conspiracy theory to explain his car ending up in another space and all because the possibility of him simply being wrong about where he had parked the car was something he was incapable of processing.
Good scenario, but you must admit that this highly improbable. We can all have some memory gap, forget something, … But also, the car of that man was clean, nothing has changed, but in that case of 9/11 there are too many unanswered questions.
Also, as I told here up, I had to change several times my opinion when I reached some impossible things.
Incidentally, the initial premise is also a true story and happened to me. Unlike the proud but paranoid man in my story, however, I pretty much immediately figured that it was far more likely that I had misremembered where I had parked rather than there being some grand conspiracy meant to make me look foolish or even doubt my sanity. While I don't absolutely rule out some sort of odd practical joke involving dozens of conspirators, it seems so unlikely that I don't consider it worth even thinking about. Now, if one of the security guards came forward later and admitted to participating in the scheme, I'd listen to him and based on what he said, reappraise my opinion of what happened, but no one to date has come forward, so it would be quite frankly crazy to give the incident a second thought.
Let me guess: It’s highly probable that you are alder than 40 years! Isn’t it?
I don't believe you to be a particularly immoral or unintelligent person, but I have to warn you that your prejudices and preconceptions, coupled with a lack of any real knowledge in all of the subjects you have the arrogance to lecture others here on are making you appear to be bigoted and somewhat stupid.
Thanks for your kind warning. But, I won’t change my opinion on basis that some other people say some insults, preconceptions about me! I am ready to change my opinion and even apologize if any people prove with extremely strong evidence that my work is false.
I did not made so long work for getting into wrong conclusions. I will not defend baseless wrong conclusions!
Any way, if you have any strong argument that shows I am wrong, you are welcome, I’ll be glad to read your arguments.
