So like Justianian, you also think that those who disagree with you are sub-human. Ok, got that.
I think you are drawing an unwarranted conclusion from limited data, are you trying to build a resume for the police in Perugia?
Alt, I always try to keep in mind that there is another human being on the other side of that screen and they are not evil nor stupid just because they disagree with me or post things I don't like. Were I to pretend I am always perfect in this regard I would be deceiving you, but at least I try.
As for the new review of the DNA evidence, what makes you think these new scientists are of a different mind-set than Stefanoni? Aren't they also in Rome, her home base? I'm sure the Italian DNA expert club is pretty small so it makes sense she probably knows these two professionally.
I think the conditions have changed since the original trial, however we will see if anyone wants to put their reputations on the line to further persecute these two college kids and go down with the sinking ship.
How specifically is the Italian judicial system dysfunctional? On what level? In Perugia or the entire nation?
I'll write a chapter on that in my book.
Just kidding, but it would really take a chapter to explore some of the problems I think are inherent to this system. To add to other comments on it I have made I will note that having to formalize the concept of guilty beyond reasonable doubt in 2006 is an indication that Italians themselves see that it is not necessarily producing justice.
You put the word forgot in quotes. Did they intentionally not record this?
Being as they recorded just about all the other witness statements, which would figure if they really rely as much on behavioral cues as Giobbi stated, I have little doubt it was actually recorded. Considering the conditions of the interrogation they set up I suspect the likelihood they failed to tape it approaches absolute zero.
How is this any different than what goes on in the U.S?
Is there a law in your area that police cannot question suspects without a lawyer present? In my area that is not the case, and going by things posted by Charley Wilkes and Halides amongst others it would seem there are numerous states where it is also not illegal.
On more than one occasion I have seen Halides post that Amnesty International report that criticizes the lack of recourse regarding police misconduct, and I know you are aware of Frank's views on "The Pack." I do believe there's a number of things such as the leaks, the destruction of evidence and the outright lies told without consequence in this case that suggest there is a lack of oversight of police.
No, that's not what happened here. If that was the case why isn't Frank in the slammer?
I meant one of the accused on the stand like Amanda or even her lawyers whom the prosecution also filed suits on.
They are lies and misstaments in your opinion.
It will all come out in the wash.
