just like the Arab villages and cities in the West Bank.
-
Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more
Israel tears down 80 year old hotel to make way for Jews ONLY
- Status
just like the Arab villages and cities in the West Bank.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Glad to see you agree that Australia is practicing "Apartheid in new shoes", per The Fool's definition.
I am not denying Australian racism. They clearly share a lot with Israeli society.
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
That's their traditional land, it's where they want to live. Their culture attaches a great deal of importance to that. There are aboriginals who live in cities, too. They would be offended if you called it a wasteland.
a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
People were legally obliged to live in a bantustan, these people choose to live there. The people in a bantustan were made citizens of a fake state, the aboriginals are full citizens of their own country.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Is any government-built houising for Aboriginals being built in Sydney?
What's the unemployment rate of people living on what you call "traditional" land? And wasn't Sydney once "traditional" Aboriginal land?
"Separate but equal"?
unless Aboriginals are forced by law to only live in these communities, your analogy to Jim Crow is baseless and pathetic.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Sorry, The Fool has informed me on many occasions that this is completely irrelevant when one talks about a Bantustan. According to him, the West Bank is a Bantustan and as far as I know there's nothing stopping Arabs from leaving or forcing them into the West Bank..
did Australia have all Aborigines under martial law, like Israel did to the Arabs until the 1970s?
The Fool
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 16,840
well, the fact that you describe thier traditional homelands as a "wasteland" simply underlines your ignorance and bigotry.
What has caused this current frenzy of yours. You sound like a birther....no amount of facts seems to sway you from your beliefs. Actually I don't think its a huge secret that you probably are not stupid enough to hold the opinions you are chanting here. Its probably the only diversion you have available at the time.
so go ahead and continue to compare Australian welfare systems for disadvantaged people with your favourite systems of keeping arabs in thier place.....bye bye..
The Fool
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 16,840
I know there is nothing as "Far as you know" because your ignorance on this issue appears to know no bounds.
please explain to us all the alternate places that someone in the west bank can go to live? please? They could beg someone to take them but thats really up to the destination....not the person in the west bank.
Birther logic again wildcat....don't let obvious facts get in the way of a cool belief.
The Fool
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 16,840
no its not
possibly your bigotry is clouding your vision....read up on the indigenous housing programmes. There is nothing, nothing....nothing(i'll say it three times hoping it penetrates) that says that only Indigenous australians can live there. In the case of a white anglo saxon who's partner is aboriginal....they can all live there. In the case of a resident of the community that is not aboriginal....they can live there. Nobody is throwing anyone out unlike the systems you admire.
Its the community (that would be people who live there) that is defined as an indigenous community and therefore makes them eligable for assistance. Nobody is going around forcing people to be classified as one race or another like the systems you admire....Nobody is telling any person of one race they cannot live with someone of another race like the systems you so admire.
And no....sorry son. you can't roundup all the blackfellas and move them somewhere that you feel is a better place for them. We don't favor that sort of thing here...
Do you think you will do some reading on these programmes or will it be more slogan chanting? Anyway...you have succeeded in deflecting attention from Israel for a couple of pages...well done.
The difference between Israel and Australia is rather clear.
One of them is a country founded by criminals from an imperial power, with no historical or any other connection to the place, by ethnically cleansing and killing all the natives and classifying them as subhuman animals.
The other one is in the Middle East.
One of them is a country founded by criminals from an imperial power, with no historical or any other connection to the place, by ethnically cleansing and killing all the natives and classifying them as subhuman animals.
The other one is in the Middle East.
Last edited:
mortimer
NWO Janitor
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2004
- Messages
- 3,517
The gist I'm getting from this back-and-forth is that the discrimination that Israel practices is *slightly* different than the discrimination that Australia, the US, and Ireland practice. So Australia, the US, and Ireland are A-OK, but Israel is still evil to the core.
WildCat
NWO Master Conspirator
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2003
- Messages
- 59,856
Of course, it wouldn't even help Israel if it simply copied, say, Ireland's policies -- then it would be evil for not being the same as the US's or Australia's policies, which are in slight variance to Ireland's.
If Israel did that, it would still be evil for not being just like the USA or Australia. Ireland would be forgotten, not having enough Jews to blame.
The Bible holds the Jews to a much higher standard than Gentiles.
The Gentiles have the Laws of Noah, while the Jews have the Ten Commandments and the rest of the 613 Mitzvot.
A Jew would know this.
So yes, it is perfectly acceptable and within the context of our faith, to hold Jews to a higher standard. And its also acceptable to hold democracies and democratic societies to a higher standard than authoritarian theocracies and secular dictatorships.
- Status