The video was made by the newspaper,
.
No, the video is claimed by some random, anonymous entity on youtube to have been made by the newspaper.
Got any *proof* that this claim is correct?
.
I doubt they followed up on their little project of 'exposing neo-nazi lunacy' by writing about it in their newspaper since it turned into a PR-meltdown for the poor lefty Danes. But TSR is trying to obfuscate because you see, this newspaper angle is completely irrelevant. Do you deny that mr. Gross was once interned in Birkenau? Of course not, he said so himself! Does not make that an anti-semite of you? Oh, wait, you have not yet revealed your own identity to us (TSR: 'not relevant'). And if you refrain from attempts to deny that he was in Birkenau, would you not agree that he is making a fool of himself with his incoherent statements?
No?
.
Got any proof that the person in the video is *actually* Zygmunt Gross?
No?
.
.
Ah, here's the problem -- you're not only ignorant of the history you're trying to deny, you're even ignorant of the method used to derive that history.
Let me try to use simple words for you: you have made a claim that a newspaper has said a certain thing. Since a newspaper is a document that would make a direct reference to that particular issue a primary source.
Instead you offer what someone else *says* the newspaper said. That makes them a secondary source, and given the nature of youtube and the fact that that someone is anonymous and does not themselves offer a proper citation to the primary (nor even enough information for the issue in question to be easily researched) makes their completely unsupported assertion suspect.
Your assertion that the newspaper said this, based as it is on a suspect secondary source is a tertiary source, and based on the iffy nature of the secondary source, and lack of any effort on your part to find the primary added to your demonstrable dishonesty leads me to believe that this video is staged by an actor sympathetic to your ideology.
Go ahead, prove me wrong -- find the *original* (primary) source for this video.
.
There is nothing more 'primary' than the video.
.
Yes, there *is* nothing more.
Nothing more than anonymous claims that cannot be backed up by anything more than "it's on the innertubes, it *must* be right."
.
Fortunately we have nein-11 on his white horse rescuing Europe in the last moment. You really think I am getting tired of that role?
.
Arrogant much? What are you actually *doing*, other than a blog with most of the hits being your own, and posting lies and ignorance on a couple of obscure forums?
That you ignore those lies and that ignorance when they are pointed out on a forum that does *not* censor dissent doesn't mean that anyone else does.
.
In Auschwitz there were between 30-46 ovens. How on earth can you 'process' 397,000 people in merely 6 weeks with that sort of capacity. Please give us a calculation showing us that it is possible in the first place.
.
http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/body-disposal/ , starting about a third of the way down for the math, although the entire article would be worth a read were one one not desperate to deny history.
.
More on the
Hungarian Jews from page 185 onwards.
.
Butz? Seriously?
Remind me again: what particular training or expertise did he have in the field of history?
What original research did he on the matter and where?
Oh, wait, he *does* cite Höss, who says " We executed about 400,000 Hungarian Jews alone in the summer of 1944."
Oh, and the ICRC, who say "Under National Socialism the Jews had become in truth outcasts, condemned by rigid racial legislation to suffer tyranny, persecution and systematic extermination."
Butz's rebuttal? To baldly assert that these were "(ambiguous and/or very general) remarks" or that "the remarks are there for political-public relations reasons," neither of which are supportable on the facts of the matter.
Yet another epic fail for niney...
.
