Mobertermy's Pentagon Evidence

A W Smith said:
I may THINK my memories are accurate, But the older I get I realise as years pass, some of my older memories are inaccurate. While at the same time I have verified that some of my memories are damn near photographic.
Click to expand...

Thats my experience too. You see the problem then with saying someone is wrong simply because they are remembering.
 
Mobertermy said:
Thats my experience too. You see the problem then with saying someone is wrong simply because they are remembering.
Click to expand...
The thing is the ONLY part they remember exactly the same (corroborated) is the impact. Would you describe all their flight paths as "the same"?
 
Mobertermy said:
Yes, that's when psychological factor X kicks in preventing you from seeing the truth.
Click to expand...

Mobertermy, you have been shown with very valid methods that the Ingersoll photos are NOT doctored. He photographed the cab exactly where it was. The poles and trees in those photos are exactly where they should be based on GE September 7, 2001 imagery.

Without being able to submit ONE iota of actual objective evidence, you completely reject the position of the cab based on subjective evidence after it has been tainted by time and bullying by 'investigators'.

I would suggest that it is you who are having problems with psychological factor X and the truth.
 
DGM said:
The thing is the ONLY part they remember exactly the same (corroborated) is the impact. Would you describe all their flight paths as "the same"?
Click to expand...


convergenceofevidence.jpg
 
BCR said:
Mobertermy, you have been shown with very valid methods that the Ingersoll photos are NOT doctored. He photographed the cab exactly where it was. The poles and trees in those photos are exactly where they should be based on GE September 7, 2001 imagery.

Without being able to submit ONE iota of actual objective evidence, you completely reject the position of the cab based on subjective evidence after it has been tainted by time and bullying by 'investigators'.
Click to expand...
John, isn't it a tad hypocritical of you to claim that the witness testimony is worthless since you are the one that started this whole witness investigation to begin with (or am I mistaken).
 
A W Smith said:
[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/convergenceofevidence.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Completely agree AW. What you are overlooking is all those yellow lines there...that's exactly where Lloyde claims he was...all just a big coincidence right?

Hey, if your friend told you that he was there when you burned your hands would you believe him? What if he and ten other people all said he was there?
 
DGM said:
The thing is the ONLY part they remember exactly the same (corroborated) is the impact. Would you describe all their flight paths as "the same"?
Click to expand...


Pretty damn close. Add to this the fact that Lloyde claims he was right under those yellow lines in AW's pic. Add to that that witnesses like Mcgraw say thats where Lloyde was too...and it gets really hard for me to claim this is all just some kind of shared delusion.
 
Mobertermy said:
Completely agree AW. What you are overlooking is all those yellow lines there...that's exactly where Lloyde claims he was...all just a big coincidence right?

Hey, if your friend told you that he was there when you burned your hands would you believe him? What if he and ten other people all said he was there?
Click to expand...


If he wasn't. Would that change the reality that he was not?
 
Mobertermy said:
Completely agree AW. What you are overlooking is all those yellow lines there...that's exactly where Lloyde claims he was...all just a big coincidence right?
Click to expand...
Then why is there no physical evidence such as damage to the pentagon consistent with a flightpath as shown by the yellow paths?

Please just answer that one question.
 
Mobertermy said:
Pretty damn close. Add to this the fact that Lloyde claims he was right under those yellow lines in AW's pic. Add to that that witnesses like Mcgraw say thats where Lloyde was too...and it gets really hard for me to claim this is all just some kind of shared delusion.
Click to expand...
You see no conflicts between accounts?
 
A W Smith said:
Which line do you think is correct?

[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/pentagon_northside_approach.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I think they are all roughly correct. And the cab was right beneath them on rte 27 - exaclty where the cab driver said he was and Father Mcgraw corroborated.
 
Sunstealer said:
Then why is there no physical evidence such as damage to the pentagon consistent with a flightpath as shown by the yellow paths?

Please just answer that one question.
Click to expand...
.
AA 77 could not have flown the paths those yellow lines indicate, and been where it was 3 seconds earlier.
Those planes cannot manuver that rapidly.
CANNOT!
It's up to Moby to show how the plane traveled towards the building from where it was previously.
That will be another CANNOT! .
 
Last edited:
I Ratant said:
.
AA 77 could not have flown the paths those yellow lines indicate, and been where it was 3 seconds earlier.
Those planes cannot manuver that rapidly.
CANNOT!
It's up to Moby to show how the plane traveled towards the building from where it was previously.
That will be another CANNOT! .
Click to expand...

You're not just gonna make a bare assertion and then reverse the burden of proof are you?
 
Until I see some evidence that the physical evidence was manipulated, there is NO way the plane could have traveled the yellow path.

BTW, I would like to see the paths of ALL the witnesses, not just CITs and the "offical path" side by side. Has anybody put that together?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom