Mobertermy's Pentagon Evidence

Childlike Empress said:
16.5, Who asked for your response? People will sue you one day for untimely worn-out mousewheels, i'm afraid.
Click to expand...

Oh, I'm sorry, I need to ask you for permission to respond? Sorry.

Hey, CE, can I post a response to your reposting of CIT drivel, please?

Pretty please?

/hee hee, YOU MAD.
 
Last edited:
Mobertermy said:
Wrong. He said he was on the sidewalk in front of the Pentagon.
Click to expand...
the pentagon has five sides, which side is the front? Are you telling me that the sidewalk that begins at the exit of the trailer compound in the south parking lot and goes up the ramp toward 27 is not in front of the pentagon? You think anyone who was on that sidewalk alongside pole number five would say they were not "in front of the pentagon"?????
 
The most telling fact about the CIT witnesses is, none of them are members of CIT or show any interest in the "truth movement".
 
Mobertermy said:
I agree with you there. I was talking specifically about people that claimed to see the lightpoles get hit - they corroborate Lloyde that it occured NoC.
Click to expand...
Did you see the damn probst video i posted? Did you see any light poles down up by the NOC flight path by the north overhead sign? Did you notice the crime scene tape tied to one of your north flight poles in front of the pentagon? Did you notice those poles in the area by the heleport were still standing?
 
DGM said:
The most telling fact about the CIT witnesses is, none of them are members of CIT or show any interest in the "truth movement".
Click to expand...
All the CIT witnesses point to the south. CIT are morons who need help with directions. When I saw their witnesses on video pointing south, I knew CIT were dumber than a bag of hammers.

With 9 solid years of failure; can 10 be far behind. 911 truth's best effort. http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/standup.jpg

Is Mobertermy saying things were blown up? None of the lamppost were blown up, they were hit by Flight 77 which flew a true track of 61.2 degrees. This means the NoC was made up by morons to fool those who lack knowledge, logic, and rational thinking skills.

pointingSouthOops.gif

CIT witnesses point south - CIT not too smart. CIT verify official flight path, and have no clue.
 
Last edited:
Scrap views don't work when talking details..
First get the general layout, then put in the smaller details..
And combining the two, with the gas stations in the area per Google Earth, Sept 7, 2001...
 

Attachments

  • Pentagon-GasStations-2001.jpg
    Pentagon-GasStations-2001.jpg
    151.2 KB · Views: 6
  • Pentagon_approach.jpg
    Pentagon_approach.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 4
  • Pentagon-GasStations-2001-A.jpg
    Pentagon-GasStations-2001-A.jpg
    152 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
The positions of the wing marks rule out a NoC approach. All the witnesses on the road are SoC. The fire station would have been damaged by a NoC approach.

Explosives would not do the sorts of damage done inside the building. The exit hole could only have been made by a mass of solid material hitting the inside of the wall.

You have no physical evidence of explosives. That's all there is to that.
 
PowerPoint skills...
Photo manipulation detection skills...
Crime Scene Investigation skills...
bow hunting skills...
 
Mobertermy said:
Because if you did that you would have to say AQ had infiltrated the Pentagon. Use the plane as cover and then just claim the plane caused all damage.
Click to expand...

I have a suggestion:

Try to estimate the energy dissipated by the plane crash:
- Kinetic energy of the moving mass
- Chemical energy of the burning fuel
And then compute how much high explosives you need to match that amount.

If the explosions were the main thing, and the plane only the cover-up, surely we'd expect "them" to use at least about that amount (order of magnitude) of explosives.

When you have done that calculation, try to find videos on youtube of other very large explosions, where the amount of explosives used is known. I can tell you already that very certainly you will not find any video of an explosion where as much energy was involved as the plane brought to the play. So whatever you find, we need to somehow multiply.

If there was such a huge explosion in addition to the plabe crash, there should be evidence of it, somewhere: In the witness accounts, in the surveillance cam images from that parking lot entrance, and of course in the physical evidence on the ground.

So what evidence do you have?
 
Mobertermy said:
I agree with you there. I was talking specifically about people that claimed to see the lightpoles get hit - they corroborate Lloyde that it occured NoC.
Click to expand...

Lloyd was SoC, as we all can see from the photos in your presentation, and got hit by a lamppost.

It doesn't matter what Lloyd was coerced to say years later by a bunch of liars. The photos speak a clear language: Lloyd was SoC. Period.

Can we close this silliness now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom