Mobertermy's Pentagon Evidence

Mobertermy said:
AW, go read his account. Its easy to find in google. He (Frank Probst) said he was on the sidewalk in front of the Pentagon when the plane flew directly overhead of him knocking down three lightposts. That doesn't fit anywhere on the official path or any of the SoC lightposts.
Click to expand...


Of course it fits, Do you see the construction trailers ? See the sidewalk alongside that exit ramp? He had just exited the construction trailer and was heading up to 27 on his way to the parking lot for his meeting. And there's the poles in yellow flight 77 hit. This screen cap is from September 2001, Before the eleventh.

317_pentagon_approach.jpg
 
A W Smith said:
Of course it fits, Do you see the construction trailers ? See the sidewalk alongside that exit ramp? He had just exited the construction trailer and was heading up to 27 on his way to the parking lot for his meeting. And there's the poles in yellow flight 77 hit. This screen cap is from September 2001, Before the eleventh.

[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/317_pentagon_approach.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

THIS.

By the way, Mobertermy::

In addition to the pending question regarding the missing North side damage path, can you share with us your theory of how the debris and passengers from a plane that crashed on a North Side path ended up on the South Side path?
 
A W Smith said:
Of course it fits, Do you see the construction trailers ? See the sidewalk alongside that exit ramp? He had just exited the construction trailer and was heading up to 27 on his way to the parking lot for his meeting. And there's the poles in yellow flight 77 hit. This screen cap is from September 2001, Before the eleventh.

[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/317_pentagon_approach.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Wrong. He said he was on the sidewalk in front of the Pentagon.
 
Mobertermy said:
Yes, they would disprove my theory. But the reason I started studying them was actually to prove Lloyde innocent, not to prove a plane hit from the North path.
Click to expand...
Not to give you false hope but, the flight path really has little to do with the main thrust of your "theory". If I have this right the only part that would change is the part that they screwed-up. Your explosives could stay only the plane hit "as planned", no fake poles, flight plans, DNA and so forth.

This leaves you with much less to "explain" but, If you ask me your still doomed.
 
Mobertermy said:
Wrong. He said he was on the sidewalk in front of the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

Extreme Face Palm. Did you really do a power point presentation on photo interpretation, yet when given a photo that clealy shows the flight path of the plane GOING OVER THE GOD DAMN FOOT PATH IN FRONT OF THE PENTAGON that is your response???????

Anyway, bump:

In addition to the pending question regarding the missing North side damage path, can you share with us your theory of how the debris and passengers from a plane that crashed on a North Side path ended up on the South Side path?
 
DGM said:
Not to give you false hope but, the flight path really has little to do with the main thrust of your "theory". If I have this right the only part that would change is the part that they screwed-up. Your explosives could stay only the plane hit "as planned", no fake poles, flight plans, DNA and so forth.

This leaves you with much less to "explain" but, If you ask me your still doomed.
Click to expand...

Yes, but that wouldn't explain why all the witnesses to the Lightpoles said they were NoC.
 
Mobertermy said:
Yes, but that wouldn't explain why all the witnesses to the Lightpoles said they were NoC.
Click to expand...
Not all did. I really don't have the patience to go through the CIT list again.

Sorry.

Rule number one of a "sinister plan" KEEP IT SIMPLE.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
Extreme Face Palm. Did you really do a power point presentation on photo interpretation, yet when given a photo that clealy shows the flight path of the plane GOING OVER THE GOD DAMN FOOT PATH IN FRONT OF THE PENTAGON that is your response???????
Click to expand...
He said he was on the god damned sidewalk in front of the god damned Pentagon when three god damned light poles landed around him. I don't know which god damned part of that you think supports the god damned official flight path.

In addition to the pending question regarding the missing North side damage path, can you share with us your theory of how the debris and passengers from a plane that crashed on a North Side path ended up on the South Side path?
Click to expand...
If the plane hit from the north flight path would they have to cover that up?
What plane debris?
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Not all did. I really don't have the patience to go through the CIT list again.

Sorry.
Click to expand...


I agree with you there. I was talking specifically about people that claimed to see the lightpoles get hit - they corroborate Lloyde that it occured NoC.
 
Mobertermy said:
I agree with you there. I was talking specifically about people that claimed to see the lightpoles get hit - they corroborate Lloyde that it occured NoC.
Click to expand...
Sure, you can view each witness in isolation if that helps you maintain your belief.

Again, I've been through this all and nothing CIT asserts holds water, period, end of story.

Sorry, I see no reason to argue NOC

If you want to go back to your pictures..............
 
So why again did they fly the plane NoC, fake a SoC path, and plant explosives? Please say it was so they could cover up the theft of $2.3 trillion so I can laugh in your face some more.
 
Mobertermy said:
North of Citgo (noc) doesn't prove flyover. The plane could have still hit from NoC. It just means that all the damage to the south of the impact would have been caused explosives.
Click to expand...

Mobertermy said:
If the plane hit from the north flight path would they have to cover that up?
What plane debris?
Click to expand...

Did you already forget what you wrote: your theory is that:

1. they faked the damage along the South path using explosives.

2. they did that because the plane hit the Pentagon from the North path, and my questions are:

1. where is the damage along the North flight path trajectory in the Pentagon? 2. how did the plane debris and passenger DNA end up along the South flight path damage trajectory.

/with regard to Probst, I am not going to waste my time further, as you appear to be completely unable to process the diagram AW Smith posted at 2:47. It is not your fault.
 
Last edited:
While we're at it, Mobertermy, say hello to Ronald "Buckley Jr. Jr." Wieck from me. Foaming-at-the-mouth ideologue and whackjob, but kinda cute. His rants are at least technically sound. He now counts Jeffrey "shure" Hill as his friend, i've read. Too funny.
 
Childlike Empress said:
Says everything about your "argument", Smith. You are aware that mudlark is still a member of this forum, right?

People can go look for themselves if they are interested in what was presented.
Click to expand...

Say, CE, still waiting for your analysis of your truther pals take down of the CIT mutts! Anyway, thanks for posting that link, here was my response:

"Hi! Thanks for cutting and pasting from banned members posts elsewhere on the internet. Please don't do that again!

Anyway, so if you have South Path witness who is not an impact witness, you throw them RIGHT THE **** OUT, huh?

Wow, that is amazing.

Richard Benedetto

Quote:
¨ The plane went down and for a split second it was out of my line of vision because there was a bridge there and a hill. ... I DID´NT ACTUALLY SEE THE IMPACT...
¨
Nuff said..

Wow! He did not see the impact, so he is worthless? Are you kidding, why don't you apply that same standard to the mutts' North of Citgo witnesses? CIT lies and claims that none of them saw the impact either. Nuff Said, huh CIT fan?

Nuff said, indeed! That is the problem when you rely on poorly educated agenda driven morons to come up with a theory. They cheery pick the hell out of everything, and sucker in the weak minded patsies to repeat their lies.

I mean, the right bank you mention: only complete incompetents like Fat Aldo and his Reggae Drummer fraud friend would deceive you like that. To even have the chance of flying the most conservative path NOC path, the airliner would have to be banked almost on its side.

ON ITS SIDE. CITiots are flat freaking lying to you. Don't be a sucker."

Judge for yourself.

/hey CE, remember when you used to rip on PFFFT? Those were the days!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom