Proof of Photomanipulation

Mobertory
Please study this animation with regard to the labelling of the TA's. This starts from the viewpoint of photo #5

Note that TA 3, which is labelled TA 3 in your "everything together " slide, is coloured red. Note that at the end of the animation the red TA is clearly TA3.



Now think, how does this affect your labelling of the TAs?
 
261mgex.jpg


The man in the white shirt is to the right of the yellow line.


Hells bells this is like Sesame Street.
 
D'rok said:
Mobertermy, please take a look at these two pictures, (the second of which was kindly provided for you by Alienentity), paying particular attention to the lamppost:

Do you see how difficult it is to determine the actual distance between the lamppost and the overhead road sign in the first image?

Please acknowledge this basic issue.
Click to expand...

Yes, I acknowledge that. Have I ever denied it?
 
drewid said:
Mobertory
Please study this animation with regard to the labelling of the TA's. This starts from the viewpoint of photo #5

Note that TA 3, which is labelled TA 3 in your "everything together " slide, is coloured red. Note that at the end of the animation the red TA is clearly TA3.



Now think, how does this affect your labelling of the TAs?
Click to expand...

Drew, that's a good graphic and I appreciate you taking the time. But I disagree with your placement of the cab there. The cab where you have it would be completely hidden by the trees by the bridge would it not.
 
No , it wouldn't, it's quite clear that it wouldn't.

What about your labelling of the TAs?
 
Mobertermy said:
Yes, I acknowledge that. Have I ever denied it?
Click to expand...
well to be honest the DOT standard for armco rail support post spacing is 75 inches. So if that rail wasn't altered you can do the math. What I am finding though is the white shirt guy photograph as presented has a very narrow field of view. This can be verified by the width of destruction and flames across the face of the pentagon in the background in that white shirt shirt guy photo. the thin yellow lines below are the approximate borders of that photo.

fieldofview.jpg
 
Mobertermy said:
So that's a yes?
Click to expand...

You're being quite rude by refusing to acknowledge the corrections given to you.

Another way to answer your question is that the man in the white shirt is certainly on the North side of the cab and on the South side of TA 4.
 
A W Smith said:
well to be honest the DOT standard for armco rail support post spacing is 75 inches. So if that rail wasn't altered you can do the math. What I am finding though is the white shirt guy photograph as presented has a very narrow field of view. This can be verified by the width of destruction and flames across the face of the pentagon in the background in that white shirt shirt guy photo. the thin yellow lines below are the approximate borders of that photo.

[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/fieldofview.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


AW, I'm sure its an honest mistake but your line that correlates with the left side of frame is pointing to the next TA north of TA4.
 
Mobertermy:
Obviously you distrust all of us to the point anything we say is meaningless to you. Have you thought of bringing your presentation to a photo forum (I'd suggest toning down the 9/11 references a bit) and seeing what people with no interest in 9/11 have to say?
 
Mobertermy said:
AW, I'm sure its an honest mistake but your line that correlates with the left side of frame is pointing to the next TA north of TA4.
Click to expand...
correct honest mistake. Ran out of view on this netbook and lost my bearings trying to scroll around in paint. You cant see gate 38 or the tree for that matter.

revisedfieldofview.jpg
 
A W Smith said:
correct honest mistake. Ran out of view on this netbook and lost my bearings trying to scroll around in paint. You cant see gate 38 or the tree for that matter.

[qimg]http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/revisedfieldofview.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...


yeah that looks better.

Mobertermey, note the adult way AW responds to finding he is in error. He acknowledges the error and swiftly corrects it.
 
DGM said:
Mobertermy:
Obviously you distrust all of us to the point anything we say is meaningless to you.
Click to expand...
No, if you guys make valid points I am begrudgingly forced to accept them. You have made some valid points on here but other things I just plain and simply don't buy.

Have you thought of bringing your presentation to a photo forum (I'd suggest toning down the 9/11 references a bit) and seeing what people with no interest in 9/11 have to say?
Click to expand...
Yes, I did do that. Only got one hit. I'll try on another forum. I tried to tone down the 9/11 angle a little but didn't want to be dishonest. One of the problems with the ppt as far as getting objective sources to look at it is that not only is it 9/11, it's also this tiny little esoteric corner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom