Merged Discussion of the moon landing "hoax"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Denver said:
Thanks. I didn't notice anything unusual with those either.
Click to expand...

His issue is that the bag "fell too fast" though so far he hasn't shown any math for how fast it should have fallen, and his timing has consisted of using the pause feature on YouTube and suggesting doing a frame analysis with the YouTube version. He then seems to be totally oblivious to why no one is taking him seriously.
 
likelystory said:
So the moon missions was achieved by blast off popcorn.

No wonder there was a big audience to watch the Apollo missions,the plume of white smoke trailing the Rocket was really a plume of popcorn for the spectators.


It's a BYOB (bring your own bucket)

Free Popcorn for all. lol
Click to expand...

No thanks. I assume you already posted your best evidence, and since that didn't cut it, I don't think there's any point to reviewing your second-best.
 
likelystory said:
So the video of the sandbag was taken on the Moon even though it was falling tooo fast? I don't think that's how detecting actually works.
Click to expand...

Since you won't show us the math for how long it takes to fall on the Moon, how about showing us your math for how too fast it falls? Does it fall six times too fast?
 
likelystory said:
So the video of the sandbag was taken on the Moon even though it was falling tooo fast? I don't think that's how detecting actually works.
Click to expand...

Why is it that you haven't questioned the other deep space programs of other countries? Wouldn't they also be a hoax?

I know that you may be a grade A student of the “truther” school of arrogance, and you appear to have had a very good GPA at UT University, but where did you get your detecting education?
 
Likely Story, just curious, did you expect to taken seriously. When you imagined this thread did you assume everyone here would be blown away by your video and comments and flock to the moon landing hoax cause? What is your desired end state here?
 
Craig4 said:
Likely Story, just curious, did you expect to taken seriously. When you imagined this thread did you assume everyone here would be blown away by your video and comments and flock to the moon landing hoax cause? What is your desired end state here?
Click to expand...

Undefiled critical thinking :)
 
Craig4 said:
Likely Story, just curious, did you expect to taken seriously. When you imagined this thread did you assume everyone here would be blown away by your video and comments and flock to the moon landing hoax cause? What is your desired end state here?
Click to expand...

I am completely almost 100% convinced of something because of this thread, or maybe not.

I am blown away by his video evidence but not for the same reasons he is. I would like a further discussion with LS about the silicon covered rocks theory he presented about 10 pages ago.
 
PhantomWolf said:
His issue is that the bag "fell too fast" though so far he hasn't shown any math for how fast it should have fallen, and his timing has consisted of using the pause feature on YouTube and suggesting doing a frame analysis with the YouTube version. He then seems to be totally oblivious to why no one is taking him seriously.
Click to expand...


Didn't he claim that the bag in the video fell at about the speed you would expect it to fall on Earth, and then also claim that the videos had been slowed down to give the illusion of 1/6th gravity?
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
Didn't he claim that the bag in the video fell at about the speed you would expect it to fall on Earth, and then also claim that the videos had been slowed down to give the illusion of 1/6th gravity?
Click to expand...

Yes.Give him time,his penny is dropping in micro-gravity.
 
It funny how they slowed down the film, and yet the movements of the arms and body are still normal.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Well they moved their arms extra fast to compensate.
Click to expand...
and.................. they do it so well as to look normal.

The next thing he will say is that they had digital tech. back then and the public was left behind by almost 50 years.

Paul

:) :) :)

That's the ticket............
 
The answer is obvious, the moon is not a moon, but a spacestation with artificial gravity.
 
likelystory, you didn't even get your name right, it should be, unlikelystory.


Paul


:) :) :)
 
likelystory said:
I've said enough here, I'm getting on with real issues like my new VAWT.

The Moon Movie Makers. lol
Click to expand...


You've said precious little of any value here. That you think you've said enough does say a lot about how little you know of actual science.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom