• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.

I was going to say bat crap crazy, but okay, I'll go with fickle

I'd have to agree with both of these responses.

Flaming paper cannot ignite other materials....:rolleyes:
EM of zero frequency (that's called DC current so apparently a large battery dustified the steel)
Anything that stands for a few seconds should stand for much longer...:eek:
 

363814d0fef23d8be1.jpg
 
Wow! It took me a long time to get through this thread. Anyway I can't believe that no one wanted to congratulate Dr. Blevins for creating a who new science (I also can't believe no one thought of calling it this a long time ago consider the nutty Dr's taste for the weed).

Congratulations Tracey Blevins for being the first practitioner of Bong Science
 

Thus demonstrating once again, as if any further demonstration were required, that Poe's Law is an accurate and insightful observation.

Dave
 
warn readers "off" reading any thread that might aid
the TRUTHERS discover and disseminate 9/11 evidence.
Okay, but I've read the entire thread, and I'm as unconvinced by the argument of the idea that the WTC was built with 3" explosive rebar on 4' centers as I am that Dr. Belvins has discovered magnetic dust that proves that there was no collapse, nor that there was some kind of magic thermite/thermate, nor that there was some Death Star weapon from space, nor....
 
She should team up with that "the rent is too damn high" guy. The confuence of crazy will at least get some media attention.
The "rent is too damn high, let's get high" party.

(trying way too damn hard to make something of this)


:o
 
Last edited:
Poe's law

Thus demonstrating once again, as if any further demonstration were required, that Poe's Law is an accurate and insightful observation.

Dave

-Fonebone< Poe's law eh ?
If you have a natural affinity to couplets and quatrains Dave ,
then YES , Poe's law is proven to be extremely accurate . Bic ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_eponymous_laws
<excerpt>
Poe's law (poetry) — There is a maximum desirable length for poems: "The unit of poetry must be fixed by the reader's capacity of attention, and ... the limits of a poem must accord with the limits of a single movement of intellectual apprehension and emotional exaltation," named for Edgar Allan Poe.[3][4] See "The Philosophy of Composition".
 
Last edited:
correction

I hope you understand that the bolded part will require some knowledge of engineering principles and calculations involved.

If you read it and your eyes glass over due to complete non-comprehension of the material presented will that
a) mean that you do not have the requisite training to understand it
OR
b ) mean that the authors are trying to bambozzle you and others by using mathimatical gobblty-gook and thus is evidence of disinformation.
????


change "C" to "D"

D: The paper from Scott.in.Taiwan
""Wierzbicki, T. & Teng, X. (2003). "How the airplane wing cut through the
exterior columns of the World Trade Center." J. of Impact Engrg. 28, pp. 601-625"
never arrives into my inbox.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6619423#post6619423
 
change "C" to "D"

D: The paper from Scott.in.Taiwan
""Wierzbicki, T. & Teng, X. (2003). "How the airplane wing cut through the
exterior columns of the World Trade Center." J. of Impact Engrg. 28, pp. 601-625"
never arrives into my inbox.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6619423#post6619423

So not only are you unable to describe "C" but you are bitching because a paper you could easily buy yourself was not provided to you free of charge, nor can you explain how this creates a "D".

Here once again for your illumination.

IIRC its $30.

If you have a problem with Scott not providing it to you gratis then take that up with Scott, not me.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom