So he claims to be paying child support, but won't show evidence of this in court.
Riiiight.
Why would it have come to court if he was paying it in the first place?
So he claims to be paying child support, but won't show evidence of this in court.
Riiiight.
Exactly.Why would it have come to court if he was paying it in the first place?
According to the papers he provided, he's been not paying to the tune of $8700.36.Why would it have come to court if he was paying it in the first place?
So he claims to be paying child support, but won't show evidence of this in court.
Here's a good (subject related) read for those of you who are always looking for new ebook material
Cheers.
So why does that damn ebil gubbermint test me in this way? For a laugh?The name is not yours and the mail which you receive is not, and never was,intended for you. It's just a test. Sit with this until you truly realise it in your heart.Once you have achieved this you will fear nothing.There is nothing else to be done.
If that's the case, he could present testimonial evidence instead of shooting himself in the foot with FOTL tactics. It may come down to he said/she said, but that's still better odds than FOTL lunacy.To be fair, he might be paying child support "under the table" the way so many New Yorkers pay their maids, in order not to let the IRS or other tax agency find out about what they're doing. If he's making sure to drop by once a month with a stack of twenties so that there's no paper trail,... well, then there won't be any paper trail. And he won't be able to show evidence in the court.
Just because he's a lying, greedy, slimy bastard doesn't mean that his ex- isn't also a lying, greedy, slimy bitch. Who decided that she could make him pay twice over. (As a matter of fact, based on the well-understood principle of "assortative mating,"...)
Repeat this until you understand: All law is positive law.Here's a good (subject related) read for those of you who are always looking for new ebook material
Cheers.
Here's a good (subject related) read for those of you who are always looking for new ebook material
Cheers.
To Be A Man e-book said:Generally speaking any legal word beginning with a capital letter should be considered with caution.17 If a word has a capital letter it is most likely a name denoting a specific thing over which the legal/financial system has jurisdiction. How easily we recognise the discrepancies in the way others spell words will determine the degree to which we are susceptible to the spell being cast.
..............
Consider how the worlds [sic] entire seed stock has been patented by a single corporation so that you will no longer be legally allowed to grow your own food, 13, 14 or consider how the government has claimed title to the water which falls from the sky so that you will no longer be able to legally drink water without a license.
so i have placed a legal defence for my case, and now i aim to relocate the common law lead case, whereby gas and water are human rights, this is due to the difference between an animal and a human being is the ability to cook food, so i need as a basic human right the facility to cook my food as well as cleaning it for consumption [as who says eating isn't a basic right?], i hope that clarifies a little where i gain my right to gas [and probably electricity] under human rights, though any suitable argument or insightful inquiry into this finding will be suitably answered i hope.
Oh dear, it appears that the court officials at Norwich Mags' have got wind that our Norfolk hero has been a very naughty boy:
http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/news/norwich_court_case_posted_on_youtube_1_751533
Mr Bond would not comment yesterday, and his friend, who sat at the back of the court while Mr Bond was in the dock, said that it was “nothing to do with him”
Yes, really "honourable" these FoTLers. When caught out doing something illegal, just deny it was you.