• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected. I got the same insults and smear tactics that the thermite-sniffers give me.

It's not a real debunking. So I have no reason that I can see to hang around here. Some of you saw my presentation. Good.
 
Some of us may have seen it, yes; however, your lack of scientific ability as regards the particular branch of science that must be utilized in order to discuss what you attempted to cover sadly makes it nothing more than a gigantic joke. Which, considering your self-affirmed status as a clown, makes it nothing more than a poor attempt at entertainment, not a scientific lecture.
 
WTC Dust said:
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected. I got the same insults and smear tactics that the thermite-sniffers give me.

It's not a real debunking. So I have no reason that I can see to hang around here. Some of you saw my presentation. Good.
Click to expand...

We point out problems with your science and rather than defend it, you waved your phd around as though that should settle the issue.

It doesn't matter how many diplomas you have, bad science is still bad science.

Here are the easy problems with what you presented:
1) You have no way to know the origin of the dust.
2) You have no way to account for contaminants in the dust.
3) You have never let a third party study the dust to confirm your results.
4) You ignore evidence contradictory to your theory.

I'm sure there are others, but determining them would require me to read back through your posts and that would give me a headache.
 
WTC Dust,

You also come in here all full of **** and vinegar, and yet, won't answer simple questions! And you expect us to bow down to your little PhD.

Well, that doesn't work around here. Everyone is judged not on their experience, but on the content of their posts.

Your "science" was flawed from the word go. As Sabrina pointed out, when this was brought to your attention, you said " I have a PhD" as opposed to defending your science.

That doesn't work around here Dr. Blevins. Never has, never will.
 
WTC Dust said:
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected. I got the same insults and smear tactics that the thermite-sniffers give me.

It's not a real debunking. So I have no reason that I can see to hang around here. Some of you saw my presentation. Good.
Click to expand...

You may think that JREF hasn't given you high quality debunking because it's your fault that you ignore common sense.

PHD or no PHD, if you feel like you're being criticised, then you should be. Waving your PHD like a flag isn't going to get you no where in the field you think you can handle, which of course you can't.

We have given you evidence & shown you how flawed your theories are. It's your choice to ignore them or to study them. If you really want to research about 9/11, all you need to do is sit down, shut up & LISTEN to what people are telling you. If you want evidence, there's plenty, if you want a crackpot theory, we'll show you some insane Truther websites that has them.
 
W.D.Clinger said:
I am truly sorry that your experience here did not include the novel insults and smear tactics you were hoping to find.
Click to expand...
I guess we need to raise our game. Too many rounds with dullards have made us complacent. An educated visitor like Dr. Blevins deserves better than the pablum we feed to the unwashed masses.
 
AZCat said:
I guess we need to raise our game. Too many rounds with dullards have made us complacent. An educated visitor like Dr. Blevins deserves better than the pablum we feed to the unwashed masses.
Click to expand...

I find the ignore button works wonders when things like WTCD burst through the rational lines
 
WTC Dust said:
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected.
Click to expand...

Just for future reference I think we'd all like to know specifically who came up a little short in the debunking area? :o

WTC Dust said:
I got the same insults and smear tactics that the thermite-sniffers give me.
Click to expand...

It doesn't take a PhD in fractal geometry to determine the cause of symmetry in this pattern. :rolleyes:
 
WTC Dust said:
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected.
Click to expand...
You'd have to offer up something to debunk first. A few blurry pictures of dirt and your own personal incredulity doesn't leave a lot of need for a "high quality debunking".
 
Originally Posted by WTC Dust
So I have no reason that I can see to hang around here.

bye bye
 
WTC Dust said:
Jref hasn't given me the high quality debunking I expected. I got the same insults and smear tactics that the thermite-sniffers give me.

It's not a real debunking. So I have no reason that I can see to hang around here. Some of you saw my presentation. Good.
Click to expand...


I'm not fooled one bit by that load of bullcrap and lies... You didn't come here "expecting a high quality debunking". Your just acting arrogant and doing the same old song and dance as every other drone, looking for an excuse to denigrate and belittle the forum while running away and childishly claiming victory.

You came in here just like every other 911 kook, all pumped up with the idea that you were going to show up the skeptics of JREF. Once your reguritated theories were ripped to shred due to their laughably obvious and numerous flaws, you predictably clammed up and refused to respond, as all 911 kooks do.

Now that your stumped, you're just pulling the same standard fallback as every other 911 kook. A poor me, arrogant routine, acting like your just innocent and you were only attacked and insulted while noone could debunk your nonsense.

I've seen this exact same game so many times it turns my stomach to watch.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom