If a highly respected and experienced Jurist who has spent over a year examining evidence in and and additionally out of the courtroom, and has allowed some of the highest paid attorneys in the country to attempt to show him their 'coherent explanations'; yet he and 5 others unanimously reject the best coherent explanations of innocenti arguments that money can buy...who are the non innocenti posters here to be challenged by you over and over for more?
And then only to suffer your repeated lofty holier than thou insinuations of inability if they wisely defer.
If an arguer concurs with anything Judge Massei's 427 page long labored production concludes, you drag out another tired overused questionably appropriate accusation of arguments from authority, which IMHO is little more than arguing by obstructionism, or in legal terminology, abuse of process.
If an arguer argues other points, he is accused of pulling moles out of hibernation or belatedly parsed and nitpicked ad nauseam.
Let's face the inevitable...if you are unsatisfied after over 35,000 attempts and over a year of trial evidence, and the 427 pages of coherent explanation..may I respectfully opt out of any attempts at yet another personal 'coherent explanation' which IMHO is an obviously already rejected 'mole' by the innocenti cabal here .
- Perhaps, like AK he didn't want to seem non-pc by blaming the black guy.
