little grey rabbit
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2010
- Messages
- 3,164
yeeesss that famous Amerigun author AC Clarke
you really are a complete smmeeeee heeeee arent ya LGR
![]()
Oh he was perfidious Albion? Oh well just as bad.
yeeesss that famous Amerigun author AC Clarke
you really are a complete smmeeeee heeeee arent ya LGR
![]()
What is it with conspiracy theorists? For all their bravado about "asking questions" and "not being sheep", they all seem to be utterly closed off to criticism, and unfailingly resort to insults and deregatory language when their ideas are challenged.
What is it with conspiracy theorists? For all their bravado about "asking questions" and "not being sheep", they all seem to be utterly closed off to criticism, and unfailingly resort to insults and deregatory language when their ideas are challenged.
In any one really professes to believe that Stanley Kubrick could have fluked the exact appearance of the lunar surface in the film 2001 before the Apollo 11 mission - that is entirely their right in a democracy.
Alas, my talents are wasted here.
How can something nonexistent be wasted?
LGR, have a trip over to www.apollohoax.net, the regulars would love to talk to you about your 'ideas'
well it livens things up, it's very quiet over there
Homeopathic talent.
Oh he was perfidious Albion? Oh well just as bad.
Indeed. I used to hang out there a lot, but real hoax believers became pretty scarce.
You can tell by the overlapping shadows that the diorama in LGR's picture is lit by several nearby light sources.
All the Apollo imagery is lit by a single, large, faraway light source.
If nothing else, the lack of overlapping shadows in actual Apollo imagery flatly contradicts LGR's claim that it's lit identically to his studio image.