• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dave Rogers said:
Is that in the name of the human soul that goes by the name Dragonrock of the JREF family, or of the fictitious corporation DRAGONROCK that is held under Admiralty Law to be the owner of your physical body?

Dave
Click to expand...

Noooo! Freemen are a whole order of magnitude more mad than Truthers!
 
WTC Dust said:
"Who"? Um...lotsa people? Do you make the claim that the dust was entirely concrete? I say no, and that is my point. The dust was steel and all the rest of the contents of the WTC buildings, not just the concrete.
Click to expand...

If i am correct i believe that steel is a very dense material that why is
wasnt pulverised to dust during the collpase along with everything else
because in the building all the materials the conetents gypsum boards computer
filing cabinets concrete etc was not as dense as the steel strcuture of the building
this is why i believe it was not pulverised to dust and everything else around it was
made of a less denser material and therefore could not have pulverise the structural steel to dust.

So where is your evidence to support the claim that the steel was pulverised to dust during the collapse of the
wtc twin towers? Where is all this evidence of steel dust from the collpases?

Please stop bragging on about you ridiculous theory for which there is no evidence to support your claim,
just get over it the steel from the buildings DID NOT JUST PULVERISED AND TURN INTO DUST DURING THE COLLAPSE.
 
Last edited:
thecritta said:
If i am correct i believe that steel is a very dense material that why is
wasnt pulverised to dust during the collpase along with everything else
because in the building all the materials the conetents gypsum boards computer filing cabinets concrete etc was not as dense as the steel strcuture of the building this is why i believe it was not pulverised to dust and everything else around it was made of a less denser material and therefore could not have pulverise the structural steel to dust.
Click to expand...

How old are you?
 
TheRedWorm said:
Why can't truthers answer direct questions?
Click to expand...

Why do duh bunkers have to be such ********? I mean with all the childish
name calling and all that you know what i mean, this section of the forum is
kind of like a little childrens playground where all the children have to throw
sand in each other eyes and faces and pull each others hair and be really mean
and nasty to each other, nope the little children in this playground
just cant seem to resolve differences and just get along with one another
can they now?
 
Last edited:
thecritta said:
Why do duh bunkers have to be such ********? I mean with all the childish
name calling and all that you know what i mean, this section of the forum is
kind of like a little childrens playground where all the children have to throw
sand in each other eyes and faces and pull each others hair and be really mean
and nasty to each other, nope the little children in this playground
just cant seem to resolve differences and just get along with one another
can they now?
Click to expand...


Oh, I agree that there is much incivility in this particular sub-forum. But I want you to reason through why that is, and why some of it might be understandable. Small hint: It is far from being one-way.
 
thecritta said:
Why do duh bunkers have to be such ********? I mean with all the childish
name calling and all that you know what i mean, this section of the forum is
kind of like a little childrens playground where all the children have to throw
sand in each other eyes and faces and pull each others hair and be really mean
and nasty to each other, nope the little children in this playground
just cant seem to resolve differences and just get along with one another
can they now?
Click to expand...

The reason people were asking how old you are is that your writing is made up of disjointed run-on sentences which is common among younger teenagers and people for whom english is not their first language. The reason that people here don't like run on sentences is that it makes it hard to understand whatever point you are trying to make.

Now, please either answer the question or explain why you are refusing.
 
thecritta said:
If i am correct i believe that steel is a very dense material
Click to expand...
Relatively speaking yes.
that why is
wasnt pulverised to dust during the collpase along with everything else
because in the building all the materials the conetents gypsum boards computer
filing cabinets concrete etc was not as dense as the steel strcuture of the building
this is why i believe it was not pulverised to dust and everything else around it was
made of a less denser material and therefore could not have pulverise the structural steel to dust.
Click to expand...

steel 7.85 g/cm3concrete 1.9 to (radiation sheilding) 5.2 g/cm3
(BTW lead is 11.3 g/cm3)
It is also more brittle than steel though(or more correctly, steel is mallable). This means that while concrete has a very high compressive strength it really sucks in tensile strength while steel performs quite well in both stress modes.
this is the reason why concrete breaks apart in stituations in which steel does not.


So where is your evidence to support the claim that the steel was pulverised to dust during the collapse of the
wtc twin towers? Where is all this evidence of steel dust from the collpases?
Click to expand...

This is what we have all been asking.

Please stop bragging on about you ridiculous theory for which there is no evidence to support your claim,
just get over it the steel from the buildings DID NOT JUST PULVERISED AND TURN INTO DUST DURING THE COLLAPSE.
Click to expand...

True.
 
Last edited:
Crap. These threads are all getting tedious again. May be time to take a break from the loonies again :(
 
It's funny how some people think that if someone doesn't respond within seconds or doesn't post every couple of hours they have some how 'run awy' or will never return.

People do have lives outside of the Internet. Even Truthers.
 
If Dr. Blevins does return to our midst, I do have some questions that I'd be interested in hearing her answer:

-Before you were awarded your doctorate, I imagine you had to present your dissertation and defend it. In that case, if a grad student were coming to you with the findings that you have presented to us, do you feel that s/he had earned a doctorate?

-Since you say that you aren't interested in proving a hypothetical DEW, only the existence of metallic dust and/or foam, what do you think would have caused the structural steel to lose its cohesive shape? Is it merely some sort of heretofore unknown physical property of steel? If so, given that there is evidence that humans have known how to forge steel for at least four thousand years, why have we never observed this previously?

-As I mentioned previously, my admittedly hardly-exhaustive search of iron compounds seemed to suggest that most are either Lewis acids or insoluble. What chemical make-up unique to your dust makes it act in a manner directly contrary to this?

-If I have understood your posts, you do not believe that there were any planes on 9/11. If so, what did all the eyewitnesses see?

-Did the process, be it an unknown property of steel or a hypothetical DEW yield 100% of the steel becoming dust? If so, what exactly was the scrap steel that was made available to the NIST and 9/11 Commission, and then later sold to Chinese companies?
 
Last edited:
I just read through the last 6-7 pages of this thread.

Pure comedy gold. Keep it up Dusty. It just gets better and better. :)
 
Captain_Swoop said:
It's funny how some people think that if someone doesn't respond within seconds or doesn't post every couple of hours they have some how 'run awy' or will never return.

People do have lives outside of the Internet. Even Truthers.
Click to expand...

I'm not just basing it on her lack of presence now as she has disappeared for a few days before. It's just that she isn't the first loon to post here until their World Changing DemonstrationTM only to have it flop and then never show their avatar here again.
 
thecritta said:
Why do duh bunkers have to be such ********?
Click to expand...

There comes a time, when dealing with a person severely afflicted with an obsessive/compulive disorder, when you simply give up trying to tell the person in a nice way:"Seriously, dude, you need help."

Some times, you just have to let them know that they are being absurdly annoying.
 
excaza said:
I think I heard something about rust, but I was busy watching glee
Click to expand...
.
Bruno Mars fikkin' *ROCKS*. Two of his songs in the ep, and best ones they did, IMO.

Yeah, I'm a Gleek, sue me.

D nor A were available to go to to his recent show in town and I hate going to concerts alone, but if I was going to, that would have been the one.
.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom