Whose phone evidence? Has something come to light recently? I thought their phones where off at the crucial period, there was some evidence that Amanda had gone out at one point earlier on and Meridith's phone had a broken off call to the bank and so on.
A friend popped by Rafael's yes?
I didn't think that established an alibi. Could you clarify?
This is a joke, yes?
Clearly, since them leaving their apartment is implicitly assumed in them committing the crime.
The prosecution surely don't need proof that they left over and above the proof that establishes that they committed the crime. What the prosecution can't cope with is proof that they didn't leave.
Agreed.
When I was last here that was the claim of one of the defense expert witnesses rather than an established fact. In any case, you are assuming one knife.
There is clearly DNA on it that didn't get there during the murder.
Could you clarify what might be found that would show Amanda and Rafael are innocent?
Perhaps, but that is the evidence that proves, or doesn't prove, that they were involved in the murder not the stuff about the alibi. At worst, if the alibi turned out to be clearly nonsense all it would do is show that there was opportunity and that they lie when it's convenient (which the "guilters" believe anyway based on their interpretation of Amanda and Rafael's various statements to the police).
First you may not think it is, but if Curatolo's testimony gets tossed because its a load of BS, then the KEY witness that places Knox/Sollecito near the crime scene and breaks the Alibi is gone. This guy is labeled a superwitness for a reason. He places them at the scene during Mignini's imagined ToD. Yet Sollecito/Knox got a clear iron tight Alibi up till atleast 9:26pm. According to their lawyers they can place someone behind the computer during the 11:30 ToD, with the new computer evidence. However, without Curatolo's testimony they can't break the pre 10pm alibi. Which is the time frame that the majority of the evidence points to the actual ToD. Besides didn't Mignini float in the possibility of a 10:30 ToD at the end of the trial. Even he doesn't believe that line of BS he fed the Jury.
I remember the confusion over this issue 20,000 posts ago. Really though, it's only important if one of them claims the other left for a couple of hours and came back covered in blood. Two people accused of a murder providing one another with an alibi is no kind of alibi. After all, they would say that, wouldn't they?
We go back long enough that that kind of nonsense doesn't matter. Strictly between ourselves, the second to last letter of my user name is a lower case L rather than an I. Everybody get's it wrong and it's my fault for choosing such a visually ambiguous name.
Not my perspective, but OK.
From memory, is this the visitor who knocked on the door, or the phone log?
Is this new evidence known, or just hinted at by the lawyers?
I thought there was only an alibi until 9:26pm?
Quite right. I grew up in a tiny secret room in a castle like Kasper Hauser.
