I am the first in the world

[dasmiller]

In one day the Universe will be a crowded place!

In my view the Big Bang is cyclic and the size of the Universe can not go under 4*10^(-43) cubic meters.

V = M*20*v/m = 4*10^(-43) cubic meters

V – Smallest volume of the Universe
M - Mass of the Universe
m – Planck mass
v – Planck volume

uhh . . . I think you already said that

 

[quarky]

In the olden days, the universe wasn't all hung up on being big.

 

[dafydd]

Yeah, but how the **** do they work?

By Kwantoom,the divine force.

 

[Craig4]

In the olden days, the universe wasn't all hung up on being big.

I know I saw the Universe at the gym the other day and he was all walking around hunched with that "fake big lats" walk trying to look all big and stuff. I was like, geeze what happened to you?

 

[Dancing David]

In the olden days, the universe wasn't all hung up on being big.

Its not the size of the universe it is how you bang it.

 

[Meed]

alfa1, I never got answers to my questions from page 1 of this thread:

I'm completely serious. You seek to use the notation of quantum mechanics. Such usage is meaningless unless you preserve the notation's meaning.

“Because science will be very complicated, those who will explain with science "Who am I?" will not be able to communicate with the rest of the population!”
Adrian Ferent

 

[dafydd]

“Because science will be very complicated, those who will explain with science "Who am I?" will not be able to communicate with the rest of the population!”
Adrian Ferent

Does Adrian always choose his words at random?

 

[alfa1]

My point is: If the Universe will become smaller than 4*10^(-43) cubic meters the Universe will have a density higher than the Planck density...
But we can't describe physics at densities higher than the Planck density in the quantum world!
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/kenny/papers/inflation.html

 

[dafydd]

My point is: If the Universe will become smaller than 4*10^(-43) cubic meters the Universe will have a density higher than the Planck density...
But we can't describe physics at densities higher than the Planck density in the quantum world!
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/kenny/papers/inflation.html

More breaking news!!!.Lucky you were here to tell us.

 

[A Laughing Baby]

In my theory, the world can be explained by the following:

A generic exponential function multiplied by some coefficient (S) is equivalent to the function of a random draw (N) from some series (U).

Imagine I put that on every post I make from here on out. And once you write it out, my function is WAY truer than yours.

 

[alfa1]

This means the Universe will not go to ZERO volume like Stephen Hawking and others said!

 

[A Laughing Baby]

My theory is still truer, sorry. I mean, take a look at it:

Se^x=F(U_n)

Accept your mathematical defeat and move on with some grace.

 

[dafydd]

This means the Universe will not go to ZERO volume like Stephen Hawking and others said!

It won't get as small as this?

 

[Meed]

Does Adrian always choose his words at random?

He's a wave, not a tangent.

 

[I Ratant]

My theory is still truer, sorry. I mean, take a look at it:

Se^x=F(U_n)

Accept your mathematical defeat and move on with some grace.

.
Having Se^x is a lot funner than worrying about the size of the universe, or its beginning or its end.

 

[dafydd]

He's a wave, not a tangent.

He's a Boojum,not a Snark.

 

[alfa1]

The problem is we have to look for another Universe where to move!

 

[A Laughing Baby]

I can't think of another universe, but I can gladly suggest some other forums for you

 

[alfa1]

A parallel Universe can be very close to us!

 

[dafydd]

The problem is we have to look for another Universe where to move!

Why and when?