I am the first in the world

[Mashuna]

Everything is in my book Who am I?
I defined 7 levels...

Live the engineers alone they are not capable to do such things...

Ha! I defined at least 11 levels. You've got some more work to do, my friend.

 

[Craig4]

Everything is in my book Who am I?
I defined 7 levels...

Live the engineers alone they are not capable to do such things...

You do realize that no one here is going to buy your book right?

 

[dafydd]

You do realize that no one here is going to buy your book right?

Along with the rest of the world.

 

[dafydd]

Ha! I defined at least 11 levels. You've got some more work to do, my friend.

I counted 12.Alfa,you're way behind.

 

[The Man]

Everything is in my book Who am I?
I defined 7 levels...

And…

Where do you place yourself in those ‘levels’?

What level would be your “animal level”.

Live the engineers alone they are not capable to do such things...

Do what “such things”?

Be mostly sane?

Be moderately crazy?

Pull a number out of their arse like

I calculated: 98%

?

You haven’t known too many engineers, have you?

As you assert “98%” are “idiots” and “rotten people” as well as “98% of people are at animal level” is this the target demographic for your book or did you write it for the other ‘2%’ that must comprise your other six levels?

Do you put that in the forward?

‘I hope you will enjoy this book in spite of the fact that I think most of you are idiots and rotten people at “animal level”.


Or closing remarks?

‘Unfortunately as this book was written for only 2% of the population not “at animal level”, so having purchased and read it chances are you are just one of the 98% I think are idiots and rotten people at “animal level”, but thanks anyway’.

Perhaps in a sales pitch?

‘“Who am I”, other than someone who has calculated that 98% of you are idiots and rotten people at “animal level”, buy my book and find out.’

 

[tsig]

"Obama represents the Americans(rich and poor) at animal level, Merkel represents the Germans at animal level, Sarkozy represents the French at animal level…."

Adrian Ferent

The USA ambassador said last week in Romania: the politicians have a special DNA that is why they do not say ‘the whole truth’.
I calculated the majority are at animal level, the politicians are elected by people at animal level.
That is why Obama represents the Americans(rich and poor) at animal level, Merkel represents the Germans at animal level, Sarkozy represents the French at animal level….
Here we are as Apes after 200000 years of Evolution.
From

You're not at the animal level, right?

 

[Fnord]

Fnord = Revenge?- you are right about Romania.
I am looking to go somewhere else...

FINALLY! You have responded to one of my posts. Now, how about responding with evidence for the existence of chakrae? What do I have to do to get you to respond appropriately to that question? Should I ask in the common language?

Vă rugăm să furnizaţi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când veţi face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici, te vor crede. Ai înţeles?

_{<Please provide evidence for the existence of "chakrae". Until you do this thing, none of us here will believe you. Do you understand?>}

 

[quarky]

This could get cruel.

Someone wandered into the wrong bar, in the wrong neighborhood, and spouted off some wrong stuff, and now we must beat him to death. Feels icky. Can't we just break its knees, and leave it alone?

 

[laca]

FINALLY! You have responded to one of my posts. Now, how about responding with evidence for the existence of chakrae? What do I have to do to get you to respond appropriately to that question? Should I ask in the common language?

Vă rugăm să furnizaţi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când veţi face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici, te vor crede. Ai înţeles?

_{<Please provide evidence for the existence of "chakrae". Until you do this thing, none of us here will believe you. Do you understand?>}

Astonishing result from a Google translation...

However, for consistency's sake, it should have been either "Te rog să furnizezi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când vei face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici te vor crede. Ai înţeles?" (for an intimate tone), or "Vă rugăm să furnizaţi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când veţi face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici vă vor crede. Ați înţeles?" (for an official tone).

 

[Fnord]

Astonishing result from a Google translation...

However, for consistency's sake, it should have been either "Te rog să furnizezi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când vei face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici te vor crede. Ai înţeles?" (for an intimate tone), or "Vă rugăm să furnizaţi dovezi pentru existenţa unor "chakrae". Până când veţi face acest lucru, nici unul dintre noi aici vă vor crede. Ați înţeles?" (for an official tone).

THANK YOU!

I had hoped that if he could explain his position in his native language, the rest of us could run it through GT and get something that (maybe) makes some sense. At the very least, he now knows that there is at least one of us who speaks Romanian.

 

[quadraginta]

THANK YOU!

I had hoped that if he could explain his position in his native language, the rest of us could run it through GT and get something that (maybe) makes some sense. At the very least, he now knows that there is at least one of us who speaks Romanian.

My Babblefish translator suggested that was an obscure dialect of Vogon.

Maybe I need to check for a version upgrade.

 

[Fnord]

My Babblefish translator suggested that was an obscure dialect of Vogon. Maybe I need to check for a version upgrade.

Vogon ... Romainian ... Rap ... it's all attrocious as poetry.

 

[Meed]

You do realize that no one here is going to buy your book right?

To be precise: 98% of us will not buy your book.

 

[Meed]

"Within each SCSPL system, subsystems sharing critical aspects of global structure will also manifest the self-configuration imperative of their inclusive SCSPL. Human beings are such subsystems."

Christopher Langan, Bouncer and World's Most Intelligent Man

 

[alfa1]

98% is OK!

 

[The Man]

"is OK", for what?

Being “idiots” and “rotten people” as well as “at animal level”? Kind of makes your other 6 levels of your “Evolution theory on people” rather superfluous. Unless of course “animal level” is your top ‘level’ replete with “idiots” and “rotten people”.

Again…

Where do you place yourself in those ‘levels’?

 

[alfa1]

Where do you place yourself in those ‘levels’?

I discovered the theory!

 

[Little 10 Toes]

Please provide proof that chakras exist.

 

[The Man]

Where do you place yourself in those ‘levels’?

I discovered the theory!

Is 'discoverer of the theory' one of your 'levels'?

If so, it makes that ‘level’ rather restrictive.

If not, then it is hardly any kind of answer to the question.

Where does 'discoverer of the theory' as one of your levels rank in relation to your "animal level"?

 

[dasmiller]

It’s all the stress and strain, elongated working hours and compressed schedules. Leading to a distortion under the applied loads and a Poisson distribution of crazy. So most engineers are only average crazy (for engineers that is), a few to the one end are practically sane (and often pass as such) and few to the other end are, well, I think ‘bat crap crazy’ is the technical engineering term.

I, for one, can pass for sane for up to several minutes, particularly on a phone conversation.

. . . if I'm not one of the participants.