• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
WildCat said:
http://chronicle.com/article/The-Shadow-Scholar/125329/

Ya never know...
Click to expand...

hehe, I doubt if it's of any consequence now, but my buddy "faked" his way into Teacher's College in the US. He approached me while we were in University to write some entrance exams for him. We used a fitness centers photo ID polaroid camera and laminator to superimpose my picture on his license. I wrote the exams and today he's the principal of a high school. I doubt if he could pass grade 10 math.
 
aggle-rithm said:
However, it seems EXTREMELY unlikely that someone has actually managed to bluff her way through the various stages of academia without learning some of the most basic concepts of science and critical thinking.
Click to expand...

You underestimate the power of cognitive dissonance. One of the most intelligent chemistry professors I ever had is an evangelical Christian. Although he knows the scientific method and thinks critically about his work, he certainly doesn't carry that over to his personal beliefs.

I suspect we are witnessing the same thing with Dr. Blevins. For some deep-rooted reason, she would rather believe in the "space beam theory" than apply critical thought to the events of 9/11. Publicly available information on the Internet, in addition to her Facebook profile, seems to confirm that she is who she says she is and she does indeed believe in Judy Woods' theory. And don't forget all of the other people who simultaneously hold PhD's while being part of the twoofer movement: Judy Wood, Steven Jones and friends, Griffin to name a few.
 
HatRack said:
I suspect we are witnessing the same thing with Dr. Blevins. For some deep-rooted reason, she would rather believe in the "space beam theory" than apply critical thought to the events of 9/11. Publicly available information on the Internet, in addition to her Facebook profile, seems to confirm that she is who she says she is and she does indeed believe in Judy Woods' theory.
Click to expand...

sad...isn't it.
 
Last edited:
HatRack said:
You underestimate the power of cognitive dissonance. One of the most intelligent chemistry professors I ever had is an evangelical Christian. Although he knows the scientific method and thinks critically about his work, he certainly doesn't carry that over to his personal beliefs.

I suspect we are witnessing the same thing with Dr. Blevins. For some deep-rooted reason, she would rather believe in the "space beam theory" than apply critical thought to the events of 9/11. Publicly available information on the Internet, in addition to her Facebook profile, seems to confirm that she is who she says she is and she does indeed believe in Judy Woods' theory. And don't forget all of the other people who simultaneously hold PhD's while being part of the twoofer movement: Judy Wood, Steven Jones and friends, Griffin to name a few.
Click to expand...



Judy Wood doesn't talk about "space beams". She talks about field effects. Field effects aren't space beams.

The person who started calling her work "space beams" is the same person, Steven Jones, who debunked nuclear fusion at low temperatures, in part by calling it "cold fusion" when it isn't a cold process. His strategy? Call the process a funny name and debunk the joke. He got famous in the 1980s for participating in a witch hunt against Pons and Fleischmann, who invented the method that created nuclear fusion events using commonly available chemicals and reasonable temperatures.

Guess what Steven Jones' next big thing was? Denying cold fusion events at Ground Zero. In the 80's, Jones debunked cold fusion with the embarrassing admission that his laboratory was unable to replicate Pons and Fleischmann's work. (Jones is a bad scientist, so P&F are frauds? nonsense)

Recently, he has attempted to debunk cold fusion events at Ground Zero by proposing a ridiculous and extremely hot method of destruction with exotic explosive materials. He's still debunking cold fusion. And he's the one who called Dr. Wood's work "space beams"?

As far as that idiot, James Fetzer, he can go participate in onanism for another 35 years, and the search for the real weapon used on 9/11 would not be slowed. Ask the guy directly, "Who killed JFK?" and he can't answer. An abject failure of a life, I'd say. This creep masqueraded for years, calling himself "Judy Wood's biggest fan" when he was actually one of her most ardent detractors. He tried to get Judy Wood to APOLOGIZE to Steven Jones for pointing out Jones' idiotic comment that "aluminum is silver at all temperatures", and Wood's graduate student, who demonstrated that Jones was wrong was mysteriously murdered near the hometown of James Fetzer.

Did James Fetzer, a self-styled conspiracy researcher, get off his duff and research the murder of the graduate student of Dr. Wood? No, he didn't. He had other more pressing needs, or so he said. James Fetzer is not a colleague of mine or of Judy Wood. He has a PhD, maybe, but it isn't a science degree. It's a history degree.

The only two theories of what destroyed the World Trade Center towers that deserve any merit are those of Jones and Wood, but Jones was debunked in 2004 by yours truly. No hot process could have destroyed the WTC because of all the survivors who did not report burns. They were expecting burn victims at all the local hospitals in NYC, but none arrived. Several of my personal acquaintances were caught up in the dust cloud and none of them were burned.

Steven Jones is a cold-fusion debunker, first and foremost, and James Fetzer is his lackey-come-lately who ONLY STUDIES CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

Whether you all know it or not, these two men are evil and have nothing to do with Judy Wood and her science.

http://www.drjudywood.com Check out the truth about Jones and Fetzer on Dr. Wood's excellent website.
 

Attachments

  • fetzer.jpg
    fetzer.jpg
    90.7 KB · Views: 1
  • do you see a similar shape.jpg
    do you see a similar shape.jpg
    103.8 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
3bodyproblem said:
Stop...please...I'm out of lolz, my side hurts.
Click to expand...

Many of you continue to deny that electromagnetic energy devices such as this exist. If a laser can burn paper but not a rubber balloon, why insist that a similar device could destroy steel without using excess heat?

I'm not sorry to inform you that "cold fusion" is real. "Zero point energy" is real. Flux capacitors exist.
 
WTC Dust said:
Many of you continue to deny that electromagnetic energy devices such as this exist. If a laser can burn paper but not a rubber balloon, why insist that a similar device could destroy steel without using excess heat?

I'm not sorry to inform you that "cold fusion" is real. "Zero point energy" is real. Flux capacitors exist.
Click to expand...

Look...I'm sure you are a very nice person in real life.....

But please please stop posting....you are out of your field and way out of your depth on these issues.
 
WTC Dust said:
Many of you continue to deny that electromagnetic energy devices such as this exist. If a laser can burn paper but not a rubber balloon, why insist that a similar device could destroy steel without using excess heat?

I'm not sorry to inform you that "cold fusion" is real. "Zero point energy" is real. Flux capacitors exist.
Click to expand...

Well if you're going to fantasize might as well make it a doozy. Judy Woods is bat crap crazy, birds of a feather I suppose.

You really have to deny a lot to get to the conclusion that it was some sort of energy weapon. So much that it's utterly absurd.

I find it utterly fascinating to hear people such as yourself make up such wild fantasies. I'm sure you're a very nice person, and I wish you the best of luck, but I would be remiss if I didn't tell you this is the craziest of all the conspiracy theories. I honestly don't know if you're being serious, or this is an elaborate hoax designed to make every other theory look sane in comparison. Beside no planers and DEW's the CD crowd seems plausible. I mean I honestly believe you're just doing this to desensitize people now, so you can lay some other theory on them later.

(now you made me feel bad. I'm sorry for suggesting you may have a mental illness. I hope your presentation goes well on December 1st)
 
WTC Dust said:
Many of you continue to deny that electromagnetic energy devices such as this exist. If a laser can burn paper but not a rubber balloon, why insist that a similar device could destroy steel without using excess heat?
Click to expand...

Because the notion that this could be done it batcrap crazy and based on no evidence whatsoever.

I'm not sorry to inform you that "cold fusion" is real.
Click to expand...

Sure. But it requires more energy at input than is produced so it is useless.

"Zero point energy" is real.
Click to expand...

Sure. But no device which which can harness it exists. It would violate the laws of physics. Any person who invented such a device would become unimaginable rich and single handidly solve the worlds energy problems.

Flux capacitors exist.
Click to expand...

You believe in time travel too? Or do you just not know what a flux capacitorWP is?
 
newton3376 said:
Look...I'm sure you are a very nice person in real life.....

But please please stop posting....you are out of your field and way out of your depth on these issues.
Click to expand...

Judy Wood discovered the mechanism. If I fail to properly describe it, that is my fault.

My work involves the study of the WTC dust. It's different from Dr. Wood's work, but it does not contradict her work in any way.

My results contradict a plane crash mechanism and explosive devices. My work MAY or MAY NOT support energy weapons as a mechanism.
 
3bodyproblem said:
Beside no planers and DEW's the CD crowd seems plausible.

(now you made me feel bad. I'm sorry for suggesting you may have a mental illness. I hope your presentation goes well on December 1st)
Click to expand...


None of my doctors has ever suggested a mental illness. My excellent grades throughout all of my educational endeavors also suggests that I have a functioning brain. I have two graduate degrees. I've had to pass all sorts of tests of academic rigor and fooled dozens of professors who gave me all those good grades in order to be a fraud.

I'm a clown, not a crazy.
Hope to see you on the first of December!
 
triforcharity said:
Except it wasn't JUST a hydrocarbon fire. It was a landfill fire, and a crematorium too.

You can't put a fire out, if you can't get to it.

Why, honestly, do you think this was invented?

http://firechief.com/mag/firefighting_waterjet_technology_cuts/



Do you mean 27 days of full rain for the entire day, or 27 days, where there was rain?

Did you see the above article?



Dust from the CONSTRUCTION site?

WHY do you insist on IGNORING everything that any of us post? Is it because it hurts your delusions?

Why are you so obtuse?
Click to expand...


Ahem???

triforcharity said:
BTW, Dusty, the amount of rain between Sept. 11th, and Dec 19th, (The 99 days that the fire burned) the TOTAL amount of rain was 7.66 inches, with a high of 1.9" in one day.

Average of .08 inches of rain per day.

From here.

http://www.wunderground.com/history...001&req_city=NA&req_state=NA&req_statename=NA

What do you think that will do to a fire this size, and this complex?
Click to expand...

Ahem?

You seem to have missed a few posts........
 
Judy Wood discovered the mechanism? Lol. You mena the one that she refuses to describe in any detail whatsoeve besides "DEW"?
 
WTC Dust said:
Judy Wood discovered the mechanism. If I fail to properly describe it, that is my fault.

My work involves the study of the WTC dust. It's different from Dr. Wood's work, but it does not contradict her work in any way.

My results contradict a plane crash mechanism and explosive devices. My work MAY or MAY NOT support energy weapons as a mechanism.
Click to expand...

Maybe you missed the interview with Dr. Woods where she revealed that she does not understand how a microwave oven works.

In fact, she made several errors during that interview.....she is not exactly the most reliable source of information.
 
WTC Dust said:
None of my doctors has ever suggested a mental illness. My excellent grades throughout all of my educational endeavors also suggests that I have a functioning brain. I have two graduate degrees. I've had to pass all sorts of tests of academic rigor and fooled dozens of professors who gave me all those good grades in order to be a fraud.

I'm a clown, not a crazy.
Hope to see you on the first of December!
Click to expand...

I don't care if you are a clown, a crazy, or just an attention whore....makes no difference to me.

All I care about is that you are WRONG.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom