Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's the fraudster Robert arthur Menard (hi rob or is it hi to one of your minions who read this then email you what's being said, not that i believe you since you are a liar) doing his best to prove that he can't tell the truth
from the very stupid icke site

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemefast
Hi Rob,

Still waiting on an answer from you.
Keep waiting.

I have no obligation to you.
Nor do I have a desire to answer endless bait questions, or spend my time and energy crafting essay answers to your questions.

You can look in your own heart or not. I have looked into my own and found my truth
That is a wonderful example of rob's specialness.
 
Here's the fraudster Robert arthur Menard (hi rob or is it hi to one of your minions who read this then email you what's being said, not that i believe you since you are a liar) doing his best to prove that he can't tell the truth
from the very stupid icke site

Quote:
Originally Posted by freemefast
Hi Rob,

Still waiting on an answer from you.
Keep waiting.

I have no obligation to you.
Nor do I have a desire to answer endless bait questions, or spend my time and energy crafting essay answers to your questions.

You can look in your own heart or not. I have looked into my own and found my truth
That is a wonderful example of rob's specialness.

I can understand Menard's predicament. freemefast did have the cheek to ask for proof of FOTL. He asked for:
Documents? Verifiable documents? You know; letters, correspondance, transcripts. Between courts, solicitors, officials, councils etc.
freemefast sums it up perfectly in his reply to Menard's refusal:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showpost.php?p=1059445900&postcount=82
 
Rob now thinks Im back on Ickes as "freemefast" , he spouts this nonsense to try and make people think there is only one person on the web who thinks hes an idiot.

I have posted in the past as Jargon Buster,Asky and steven1, what Menard has actually done by arguing with me is actually engineer his own demise, just "Google" Rob Menard and add any one of my former user names and it shows him being debunked :D
He has forever linked himself to my alter egos and is now stuck with them, hell he even made a video :):):)

by the way Im not freemefast as i no longer feel the need to further debunk Menard there is enough info out there already and he debunks himself most of the time now anyway.

JB
 
Rob now thinks Im back on Ickes as "freemefast" , he spouts this nonsense to try and make people think there is only one person on the web who thinks hes an idiot.

I have posted in the past as Jargon Buster,Asky and steven1, what Menard has actually done by arguing with me is actually engineer his own demise, just "Google" Rob Menard and add any one of my former user names and it shows him being debunked :D
He has forever linked himself to my alter egos and is now stuck with them, hell he even made a video :):):)

by the way Im not freemefast as i no longer feel the need to further debunk Menard there is enough info out there already and he debunks himself most of the time now anyway.

JB

How can you remain in any kind of honor when you continually dishonor yourself in this way?

Pot and kettle seem to come to mind.
 
How can you remain in any kind of honor when you continually dishonor yourself in this way?

Pot and kettle seem to come to mind.

What kind of dishonour is the leader of your cult rob in then? He sells dvd's full of lies and yet you accept every word he says.
 
Rob has spoken
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145662&page=2
he says
The basic tenet, which we speak of constantly, so if you haven't picked it upi yet here it is. Try not to ignore or twist it.

1 - We are all equal.
2- Due to the above, no one can govern another without the consent of the other.
3- The appearance of consent is routinely achieved using deception by those who need consent. It is so subtle as to appear that consent is not required.

There you have it. From now on I trust you will not spread the lies and misinformation and will accept these basic tenets and speak of these when you try to denigrate us.

Peace.

Rob

number 3 interests me the most. He's claiming that the courts or police or whomever need my consent to do anything to me, sounds good, maybe it's true.
Let's see, any reasonable person would then ask rob for proof of that and ask for examples of someone doing this, unfortunately when asked for truth rob tells you to look to your heart which doesn't really help. So as it stands he's talking rubbish and in reality is just touting for business from the retards, sorry free thinkers over at ickes who are impressed by what's in robs heart and the path he has chosen, in honour and without prejudice, without work and a reliance on benefits.His path may be steep and the ditches deep but the creator knows that what he does is for the benefit of all of humanity. The sacrifice he makes, the long hours spent studying are to him, without comparison and as such should be treated with respect, not derision. That fact it's all lies isn't important because it's a journey, a journey to the heart of man and if you make it you too can be a protected poster at ickes and sell dvd's with rubbish you've just made up or copied off someone else.
 
What kind of dishonour is the leader of your cult rob in then? He sells dvd's full of lies and yet you accept every word he says.

If Rob sells DVD's then good luck to him, if he is in dishonour, point it out, I am sure Rob is big enough to defend him self.

I can not answer for him, as well you know.

Leaders are for sheep, Bob, i choose to lead rather than be lead :D
 
How can you remain in any kind of honor when you continually dishonor yourself in this way?

Pot and kettle seem to come to mind.

This strikes me as attacking the arguer, not the argument. Perhaps you could explain how jargon buster is dishonoring himself?
 
With regards Menard,I consider my actions as not disimilar to an undercover police officer pretending to be a child to trap paedophiles on the net.
Which is not a bad analogy when you research the Elizabeth Ann Elaine Society.

If thats dishonourable then so be it.
 
In response to Robs comments
1 - We are all equal.
Quite clearly untrue, we have a hieracial society
2- Due to the above, no one can govern another without the consent of the other.
Individual consent is irrelevant, if you break the law it isnt an issue.
3- The appearance of consent is routinely achieved using deception by those who need consent. It is so subtle as to appear that consent is not required.
No deception required, as individual consent is irrelevant.
 
Menard's unraveling on Icke's
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=145662&page=2

Rob Wrote
1 - We are all equal.
Brianthebrain wrote
that aside where have you got the idea we are all equal ? the communist manafesto ? the US dec of independance, certainly not the origin of the species,,, where is it said that this is any more than a theory and has become a lawfull right of equality, trying to ban inequality is like trying to ban migits, it is a requirement of nature that the ''strong'' succeed and the weak dont
Rob then wrote
Before the law all are considered equal. It does not mean we all have equal abilities, but equal rights regardless of those abilities.

brian then wrote
your changing tack, you said every one was equal, now its just equal before the law
which laws say this please, or have you just made it up

And Rob disappeared......right on cue :D
 
Everyone's equal before the law, but the law is a construct used to keep us down. I really can't see where he's going with that.
 
Everyone's equal before the law, but the law is a construct used to keep us down. I really can't see where he's going with that.



That's right - everyone is equal before the law he refuses to consent to.

Or does he imagine that the establishment of the US Constitution, the Magna Carta, and every other document he could ever point to that establishes individual rights, were arrived at without anyone imposing their will on anyone else? I imagine there's a couple of Kings of England who would dispute that!
 
If Rob sells DVD's then good luck to him, if he is in dishonour, point it out, I am sure Rob is big enough to defend him self.

I can not answer for him, as well you know.

Leaders are for sheep, Bob, i choose to lead rather than be lead :D

Er....... rob has had it pointed out to him many times, why do you think he only posts at the very stupid icke site or VSIS for short (the greek god of stupid). You are deliberately ignoring the fact that the stuff on his dvd's are lies and have resulted in a number of people losing their stuff, not to mention their liberty.
You can't answer for him but you defend him to the hilt, why?
Sheep don't have leaders, what make you think that, oh i know you think you are clever,leading the way.Lets examine how you are leading the way, you watch a couple of freemen videos on youtube, you read a few pages on the world freemen society site and VSIS and now you think you are a leader, it's pathetic, you are what the totally idiotic david icke or TIDI (greek god for moron attraction and hippy tee shirt) says, a repeater. The very idea that you are in any way leading your own way is stupid,delusional and pathetic. As John Cleese might say your just a silly little man.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom