dafydd
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 35,398
I will join in on WFS later, I have a secret account over there.![]()
Are you the mysterious sygt that drok was asking about?
I will join in on WFS later, I have a secret account over there.![]()
Here's the fraudster Robert arthur Menard (hi rob or is it hi to one of your minions who read this then email you what's being said, not that i believe you since you are a liar) doing his best to prove that he can't tell the truth
from the very stupid icke site
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemefast
Hi Rob,
Still waiting on an answer from you.
Keep waiting.
I have no obligation to you.
Nor do I have a desire to answer endless bait questions, or spend my time and energy crafting essay answers to your questions.
You can look in your own heart or not. I have looked into my own and found my truth
That is a wonderful example of rob's specialness.
freemefast sums it up perfectly in his reply to Menard's refusal:Documents? Verifiable documents? You know; letters, correspondance, transcripts. Between courts, solicitors, officials, councils etc.
Rob now thinks Im back on Ickes as "freemefast" , he spouts this nonsense to try and make people think there is only one person on the web who thinks hes an idiot.
I have posted in the past as Jargon Buster,Asky and steven1, what Menard has actually done by arguing with me is actually engineer his own demise, just "Google" Rob Menard and add any one of my former user names and it shows him being debunked
He has forever linked himself to my alter egos and is now stuck with them, hell he even made a video
by the way Im not freemefast as i no longer feel the need to further debunk Menard there is enough info out there already and he debunks himself most of the time now anyway.
JB
How can you remain in any kind of honor when you continually dishonor yourself in this way?
Pot and kettle seem to come to mind.
What kind of dishonour is the leader of your cult rob in then? He sells dvd's full of lies and yet you accept every word he says.
How can you remain in any kind of honor when you continually dishonor yourself in this way?
Pot and kettle seem to come to mind.
Quite clearly untrue, we have a hieracial society1 - We are all equal.
Individual consent is irrelevant, if you break the law it isnt an issue.2- Due to the above, no one can govern another without the consent of the other.
No deception required, as individual consent is irrelevant.3- The appearance of consent is routinely achieved using deception by those who need consent. It is so subtle as to appear that consent is not required.
Brianthebrain wrote1 - We are all equal.
Rob then wrotethat aside where have you got the idea we are all equal ? the communist manafesto ? the US dec of independance, certainly not the origin of the species,,, where is it said that this is any more than a theory and has become a lawfull right of equality, trying to ban inequality is like trying to ban migits, it is a requirement of nature that the ''strong'' succeed and the weak dont
Before the law all are considered equal. It does not mean we all have equal abilities, but equal rights regardless of those abilities.
your changing tack, you said every one was equal, now its just equal before the law
which laws say this please, or have you just made it up
Everyone's equal before the law, but the law is a construct used to keep us down. I really can't see where he's going with that.
and the Barons who forced John to sign.I imagine there's a couple of Kings of England who would dispute that!
If Rob sells DVD's then good luck to him, if he is in dishonour, point it out, I am sure Rob is big enough to defend him self.
I can not answer for him, as well you know.
Leaders are for sheep, Bob, i choose to lead rather than be lead![]()