• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

North Korea fires artillery on the South

Did they even have a military?

they had the Taliban, sure not comparable to a nuclear army like in NK.
but the people of NK are far more in need of help compared to the Afghani.
 
I don't know, but I do know I don't want to see three million dead South Koreans and/or Seoul in ruins.

And by the way, what exactly is your suggestion. War against the leaders, waged by whom?

but 3 million death to starvation in NK are ok?
 
and what do you think should be done? wait and drinking tee?

What do you think should be done? What course of action can you propose that won't result in the immediate leveling of Seoul and Incheon?
 
What do you think should be done? What course of action can you propose that won't result in the immediate leveling of Seoul and Incheon?

srtange, in Iraq we ware not so scared he would use his stockpiles of WMD's........
 
but 3 million death to starvation in NK are ok?

No, it's not OK at all, and it doesn't turn into more OK by sacrificing more people in a neighboring country. What do we do to avoid getting 3 million dead of starvation in NK and another 3+ million dead in artillery attacks in SK? And by the way, who exactly is we, anyway?
 
Last edited:
No, it's not OK at all, and it doesn't turn into more OK by sacrificing more people in a neighboring country. What do we do to avoid getting 3 million dead of starvation in NK and another 3+ million dead in artillery attacks in SK? And by the way, who exactly is we, anyway?

we the international community.
 
:rolleyes: i already said what i think should be done. and i anwer questions when i want, you are in no position to give me orders lol.

And somehow you think "warring with the NK regime and not the people" will put up a magical force field around Seoul and Incheon? Those will be the first things gone if the armistice is broken. Your comparison between Iraq and NK is idiotic, and your plan makes no logistical sense.
 
Last edited:
And somehow you think "warring with the NK regime and not the people" will put up a magical force field around Seoul and Incheon? Those will be the first things gone if the armistice is broken. Your comparison between Iraq and NK is idiotic, and your plan makes no logistical sense.

But doing nothing and let them build more nukes, sink ships and shelling SK while their people are starving in goulags is somehow the magical plan that will solve the problem, i see. very convincing your plan.
 
Although there is circumstantial evidence to suggest NK may have set off a couple of test explosions within the last couple years, there's no evidence whatsoever to support North Korea's having deployable nuclear weapons.
 
But doing nothing and let them build more nukes, sink ships and shelling SK while their people are starving in goulags is somehow the magical plan that will solve the problem, i see. very convincing your plan.

And the destruction of Seoul and Incheon (at the very least) is better?
 
Although there is circumstantial evidence to suggest NK may have set off a couple of test explosions within the last couple years, there's no evidence whatsoever to support North Korea's having deployable nuclear weapons.

Yes, there's that, but NK doesn't need nukes. They have a perfectly capable standing army.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom