Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

[CORed]

You believe math more than your own eyes? OK.

Of course I do. My eyes can be easily fooled. It's happened many times in my life.

 

[CORed]

What about hi-velocity Sabots ? Would the shockwave do no damage to the crew ?

Whoosh!

That was the sound of sarcasm going right over Bill's head.

 

[CORed]

Explain how they faked a plane crash in front of hundreds of thousands of witnesses and hundreds of cameras without anybody from any angle noticing. If you cannot do this, there is no reason for any sane person to even consider your "magic trick" nonsense.

Hey! As long as WTCDust is dreaming up an imaginary weapon that can dustify an entire WTC tower, he might as well dream up an imaginary hologram projector (or whaterver) that can make thousands of people and hundreds of cameras think see two planes crash into two buildings.

 

[A W Smith]

There was a fake plane in the sky. It was captured by still photographers, videographers and eyewitnesses. There was no type of plane crash. No images of debris at the south face of WTC 2 exist. Go ahead. Find one.

http://cryptome.org/info/wtc-punch/wtc-punch.htm

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Let me put it this way. The plane weighed one three-hundredth of one percent the weight of the building. That weight was spread out over an area almost as large as the width and depth of the building. Some of the aluminium was as thin as 1mm . You couldn't quite roll a cigarette in it but pretty damn close.

So no, at 590 mph the plane in toto could not have entered the building.

....and it has to be all or you are done..

I'm a kindhearted man, and therefore hope that ignorance on a scale as demonstrated by the above doesn't hurt. It would be very terrible to imagine someone suffering such pain and discomfort.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

NOT WITHOUT DESTROYING ITSELF IN THE PROCESS!!!!


You're paying attention to what happened to the building, instead of what should have happened to the "plane".

A plane flying into a building will create damage to the building, but it will wreck itself in the process. What's missing in the 9:03AM videos is damage to the "plane". No plane crash? No plane. No plane? No hijacking. No hijacking? No ObL.

Snort. Comedy gold.

Oh, wait. I forgot about the terrible pain. Sorry. Please accept my sympathy.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

I just caught this. You think I'm mutilating the JREFers? <blush> Aww, shucks. I thought I was just doing a pretty good job. Thanks for the compliment.

You are doing a pretty good job...of making me laugh.

Without an amount of dedication I'm wagering you would not care to give, your chances of rising to a place of prominence in any physics class or discussion of critical thinking is pretty much zero.

Oh yeah, you're doing a "pretty good job" of taking the mean 'ol JREFers to task. Ha ha. Ha ha. Ha.

Self-delusion, thy name is Truther.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

I actually don't prefer to talk about planes at all, because I study what destroyed the World Trade Center.

The only reason I have a nuanced view of the plane aspect is because of so many people insisting that hijackings occurred.

Planes play NO ROLE WHATSOEVER in the destruction of the World Trade Center, and so they are not part of my research.

Bolded to illustrate the old observation that sometimes the comedy writes itself.

 

[Rolls]

delete

 

[dc1971]

I'm a kindhearted man, and therefore hope that ignorance on a scale as demonstrated by the above doesn't hurt. It would be very terrible to imagine someone suffering such pain and discomfort.

LOL! I hope you don't mind, I would love to borrow this statement sometime?

 

[dc1971]

NOT WITHOUT DESTROYING ITSELF IN THE PROCESS!!!!


You're paying attention to what happened to the building, instead of what should have happened to the "plane".

A plane flying into a building will create damage to the building, but it will wreck itself in the process. What's missing in the 9:03AM videos is damage to the "plane". No plane crash? No plane. No plane? No hijacking. No hijacking? No ObL.

I thought you weren't discussing planes?

 

[WTC Dust]

You're not a survivor, you liar.

Remember this?

Anyone who had to breathe in fumes for all that time is a survivor, and my close friends were affected and are dying because of it. I suffered physically because of 9/11, so please step off.

 

[WTC Dust]

You're not a survivor, you liar.

Remember this?

If you apologize for calling me a liar, and if you promise not to do it again, I won't put you on my ignore list.

 

[WTC Dust]

You know damned well that is a lie. Mackey demolished it in detail and three-part harmony. SO, if you want to persist in this, show in DETAIL, and with SPECIFICS (exact calculations and standard numbers for strengths of materials) why you think Mackey was wrong.

Otherwise, you are just repeating lies because you like the way they sound.

No Mackey did not, Ben. He created a strawman (absolute verticality of attack) and then debunked it.

 

[dtugg]

Still no explanation for how the greatest magic trick in history was done yet.

Man, I thought those CIT idiots were nuts with their Pentagon magic trick, but Dusty is is claiming that an even greater one happened at the WTC. Just wow.

 

[WTC Dust]

Originally Posted by WTC Dust [qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/helloworld2/buttons/viewpost.gif[/qimg]
Your anger is misplaced. I also suffered directly due to 9/11. I am a survivor..

No you are not. I was flying on 9-11. My plane could have been hijacked.

If anything....I am a survivor.

We are having survivor contests, now? Step back, dude. It's one thing to call me crazy or say I'm faking my scientific credentials.

It's another thing to tell me that I didn't survive 9/11. Them's fighting words.

 

[WTC Dust]

I doubt that you are a survivor of 911.

Millions of New Yorkers survived it. They didn't get to live high and pretty with clean air like the rest of you folks.

 

[dtugg]

Didn't you say you weren't even in NYC on 9/11? Survivor my ass.

 

[brazenlilraisin]

It's another thing to tell me that I didn't survive 9/11. Them's fighting words.

Aren't you the one who said 9/11 needs a clown? So what are you going to do, open up a can of silly string on him?

 

[dc1971]

Didn't you say you weren't even in NYC on 9/11? Survivor my ass.

Yeah, I caught that too!