Merged No Planes At WTC (Split from: WTC Dust)

Status
Not open for further replies.

WTC Dust

Illuminator
WTC Dust
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
3,529
Dragonrock said:
Scientist troll can't do science
Click to expand...

Steel wins in a contest of aluminum vs. steel, at the supposed velocity of the plane and the actual thickness of the metals involved.

An aluminum plane might be able to puncture through a paper thin sheet of steel and keep on trucking, but the exterior steel beams of the WTC were much thicker than that.
 
WTC Dust said:
Steel wins in a contest of aluminum vs. steel, at the supposed velocity of the plane and the actual thickness of the metals involved.

An aluminum plane might be able to puncture through a paper thin sheet of steel and keep on trucking, but the exterior steel beams of the WTC were much thicker than that.
Click to expand...

Even more importantly they were BOX columns which meant that they would have to be crushed against the concrete floor slabs at 12 foot intervals before penetration. All 33 columns.

They would have us believe that the butter cut the knife in this instance.
 
Last edited:
nvidiot said:
You have maths to show this?
Click to expand...

Why don't you prove that a plane can do this? You are the one making an extraordinary claim, not me.

Other plane crashes into buildings don't do what was done to the WTC. That doesn't take math to understand.
 
nvidiot said:
You have maths to show this?
Click to expand...

If bird flesh can damage an airplane, I'm not too far out there if I make a claim that a huge steel beam will win in a steel vs. aluminum fight.
 

Attachments

  • bird damage.jpg
    bird damage.jpg
    133.6 KB · Views: 17
Are you another one of those people who think the planes should have bounced off?
 
WTC Dust said:
Steel wins in a contest of aluminum vs. steel, at the supposed velocity of the plane and the actual thickness of the metals involved.

An aluminum plane might be able to puncture through a paper thin sheet of steel and keep on trucking, but the exterior steel beams of the WTC were much thicker than that.
Click to expand...

Lead is softer than aluminum and both are softer than steel. Yet, a .50 caliber round will punch through 1 inch of plate steel armor.

Physics troll fails physics
 
WTC Dust said:
If bird flesh can damage an airplane, I'm not too far out there if I make a claim that a huge steel beam will win in a steel vs. aluminum fight.
Click to expand...

Except, using your logic of "steel is stronger than aluminum," since flesh is weaker than aluminum, the bird should have done no damage.

So your reasoning is flawed. I'm shocked.
 
WTC Dust said:
If bird flesh can damage an airplane, I'm not too far out there if I make a claim that a huge steel beam will win in a steel vs. aluminum fight.
Click to expand...

What really gets me about this is that you just proved yourself wrong. I wonder if you have the ability to figure out why.

Clueless troll is clueless

ETA: excaza and DGM just explained it, but you'll still not get it.

Hardheaded troll is hardheaded
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Steel wins in a contest of aluminum vs. steel, at the supposed velocity of the plane and the actual thickness of the metals involved.

An aluminum plane might be able to puncture through a paper thin sheet of steel and keep on trucking, but the exterior steel beams of the WTC were much thicker than that.
Click to expand...

How about water V steel?
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Excellent post! Well done. Now explain how the bird damaged the plane.
Click to expand...

Obviously because it was much softer than steel. If it had been made of steel the plane would have been undamaged. Didn't you see what happened at the WTC when the plane hit all those heavy steel box columns ? Like butter through a hot knife it was..
 
bill smith said:
Obviously because it was much softer than steel. If it had been made of steel the plane would have been undamaged. Didn't you see what happened at the WTC when the plane hit all those heavy steel box columns ? Like butter through a hot knife it was..
Click to expand...
So you also believe a bird is tougher the aluminum?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom