• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a picture of both kinds of dust, light and dark. The image taken of the dust that I discovered is on the right, and shows both types of dust, light and dark.
 

Attachments

  • two colors of dust found at ground zero.jpg
    two colors of dust found at ground zero.jpg
    113.1 KB · Views: 1
  • cropped dust image.jpg
    cropped dust image.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
Here's some dust found right at Ground Zero. It looks really, really contaminated, doesn't it? There are all kinds of stuff in that dust.
Click to expand...

No, as the contents of the dust is not contaminated by an outside source, like cigarette butts, bum piss, and drunken peoples' puke. The stuff that is there, is supposed to be there.

Most of that looks to me like SFRM and loose (blown) insulation.

Looks like this stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-tJjPHoG6w

Start at 16 seconds.
 
The material kept fuming after it was placed in the dump truck. Weird. You wouldn't think a plane crash could cause all this dust. The fuming continues when the grappler is gone.
 

Attachments

  • fumes from a dumptruck.jpg
    fumes from a dumptruck.jpg
    146.4 KB · Views: 2
  • more fumes from a dumptruck.jpg
    more fumes from a dumptruck.jpg
    137.9 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
The material kept fuming after it was placed in the dump truck. Weird. You wouldn't think a plane crash could cause all this dust. The fuming continues when the grappler is gone.
Click to expand...

Clearly your experience of demolition sites is very limited. Pulverised plasterboard and other materials can cause a very fine dust which perists for some considerable time.

But you're not interest in that kind of information, or anything which contradicts your unfounded belief in DEW at WTC.
 
Last edited:
Other researchers picked up dust like this. I wonder if they thought, "OMG! My samples are contaminated!! Therefore, they are invalid!!" Or did they scoop up the dust anyway and take their measurements?
 

Attachments

  • contaminated dust.jpg
    contaminated dust.jpg
    121.6 KB · Views: 2
WTC Dust said:
Other researchers picked up dust like this. I wonder if they thought, "OMG! My samples are contaminated!! Therefore, they are invalid!!" Or did they scoop up the dust anyway and take their measurements?
Click to expand...

I wonder if they waited eight years to collect their samples.
 
Architect said:
Clearly your experience of demolition sites is very limited. Pulverised plasterboard and other materials can cause a very fine dust which perists for some considerable time.

But you're not interest in that kind of information, or anything which contradicts your unfounded believe in DEW at WTC.
Click to expand...

DEW can be falsified, and my research would be the same. Two (or more) different types of dust found from the WTC attacks. It's compatible with DEW, but DEW might not be the mechanism by which the dust I found got to be where it was. It was still there, and it's still very strange dust.
 
WTC Dust said:
DEW can be falsified, and my research would be the same. Two (or more) different types of dust found from the WTC attacks. It's compatible with DEW, but DEW might not be the mechanism by which the dust I found got to be where it was. It was still there, and it's still very strange dust.
Click to expand...
It's not compatibles with ANY DEW that exists or is even contemplated outside of an EE Smith novel or the original Star Wars film!
 
WTC Dust said:
DEW can be falsified, and my research would be the same. Two (or more) different types of dust found from the WTC attacks. It's compatible with DEW, but DEW might not be the mechanism by which the dust I found got to be where it was. It was still there, and it's still very strange dust.
Click to expand...

Maybe it was MAGIC! Is it compatible with MAGIC?!?
 
WTC Dust said:
Other researchers picked up dust like this. I wonder if they thought, "OMG! My samples are contaminated!! Therefore, they are invalid!!" Or did they scoop up the dust anyway and take their measurements?
Click to expand...
At least it would have been contemporous!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom