• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Katopale said:
Why are people responding to this "performance"?

Are you a failed actor WTC Dust?
Click to expand...

No. I decided in freshman year of high school not to pursue traditional forms of entertainment as a career.

You know why? Because actors repeat the lines that are written by other people, and are engaged in the shallow pursuit of providing a time waster to the masses. They don't themselves represent much, although Clooney, Jolie, Penn and others are changing that.
 
WTC Dust said:
This is funny! You all were demanding I did extra tests on my dust, 9 years later, and presumably would have considered these tests valid.

What changed?
Click to expand...

First off, "extra" tests? You have done zero tests.

Second, I don't know why you're assuming we would consider the tests valid, questioning the chain of custody was one of the first things done in this thread. It's not our fault that it took you 60 or so pages of obfuscating to reveal it.
 
leftysergeant said:
Welding fume would stick to the foam. If it is in an environment where it would be exposed to rain or fog, it would form a suface film. A foam would absorb dissolved salts rather deeply.

Eight years is long enough for a foam to soak up all sorts of surface contaminents.
Click to expand...

OK, I can see this as an issue. The particular nook that the dust was found in is open to the air but protected from rain by a concrete overhang.

I was gobsmacked to see it there, and I never would have recognized it for what it was had I not done all the years of research on the dust.

It is a fantastic find, and it still amazes me that I waited all these years without a sample, but eventually found it.
 
excaza said:
I don't understand why you keep clinging to the notion that the supposed heterogeneity of your dust somehow will change the mass composition.
Click to expand...

OK. Let me explain. If you do mass composition on the lighter colored dust and get fibers and glass, but do mass composition on the darker dust and find iron and iron oxide, you have major heterogeneity.

Also, the macroscopic structure of the dust is different between the two types. The darker dust has the texture of somewhat hardened foam, with noticeable air bubbles. It also has rusty spots. This isn't found in the lighter colored dust.

I think that the darker dust is the dust that Steven Jones analyzed. He called the rust spots "active thermitic material" against logic. The lighter dust is more abundant and is what most researchers discovered when they went scooping stuff off the ground.
 
excaza said:
First off, "extra" tests? You have done zero tests.

Second, I don't know why you're assuming we would consider the tests valid, questioning the chain of custody was one of the first things done in this thread. It's not our fault that it took you 60 or so pages of obfuscating to reveal it.
Click to expand...

Wait one second! You were instructing me to do mass composition analysis of my dust, and now it is 9 years later. What was that all about?
 
WTC Dust said:
My PhD advisor enjoyed the heck out of me, and even allowed me to title my thesis, "The Two State Model of Receptor Activation: The Agonist and the Efficacy". You can probably google that, too.
Click to expand...

I did. Apparently you are not lying about having a PhD. The University of Texas must have exceptionally low standards.
 
WTC Dust said:
Also, the macroscopic structure of the dust is different between the two types. The darker dust has the texture of somewhat hardened foam, with noticeable air bubbles. It also has rusty spots. This isn't found in the lighter colored dust.
Click to expand...

Again, consistant with cementic foam sprayed on as a fire resistant coating. Rust specs is more consistant with its having been exposed to airborne steel or iron dust than with being a product of "dustified" steel. Had it originally been steel, it would be uniformly rusted.
 
WTC Dust said:
OK. Let me explain. If you do mass composition on the lighter colored dust and get fibers and glass, but do mass composition on the darker dust and find iron and iron oxide, you have major heterogeneity.

Also, the macroscopic structure of the dust is different between the two types. The darker dust has the texture of somewhat hardened foam, with noticeable air bubbles. It also has rusty spots. This isn't found in the lighter colored dust.

I think that the darker dust is the dust that Steven Jones analyzed. He called the rust spots "active thermitic material" against logic. The lighter dust is more abundant and is what most researchers discovered when they went scooping stuff off the ground.
Click to expand...

I've never seen so many words say so little.

Well, except for jammonoius.

This still isn't relevant to your complete inability to provide a mass composition of your dust. Dust that's supposedly from the WTC but you didn't find until last year.
 
a semi-serious request, as befits this thread's eponymous clown

WTC Dust said:
B.A. Biology, Washington University in Saint Louis, 1992
Ph.D. Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Houston, 1999
Professional Certificate in Education, Pace University, NYC, 2010
Click to expand...

dtugg said:
I did. Apparently you are not lying about having a PhD. The University of Texas must have exceptionally low standards.
Click to expand...
Please do not confuse the University of Texas (which has high standards) with the University of Texas at Houston (which awarded a PhD to WTC Dust).
 
WTC Dust said:
Wait one second! You were instructing me to do mass composition analysis of my dust, and now it is 9 years later. What was that all about?
Click to expand...

There's absolutely no way to account for what happened to your dust over the 9 years it wasn't in your control. It would be extraordinarily dishonest for you to use this dust to make your conclusions about the WTC.
 
WTC Dust said:
9/11 truth needs a clown.:p
Click to expand...

Which part of 9/11 do you find the funniest.

The part where Kevin Cosgrove, trapped atop WTC2 cries to the 911 operator " We're young men. We're not ready to die " moments before all goes dark for him, or the sight and sound of the bodies hitting the pavement next to the firefighters, or the part where President Ahmadinejad and many Muslims now believe that 9/11 was a US conspiracy?
 
Last edited:
leftysergeant said:
Welding fume would stick to the foam. If it is in an environment where it would be exposed to rain or fog, it would form a suface film. A foam would absorb dissolved salts rather deeply.

Eight years is long enough for a foam to soak up all sorts of surface contaminents.
Click to expand...

Fog I can see, but rain doesn't even fall where the dust was found, and it was 8 stories deep inside a nook, so street dust doesn't really get in there.

However, there were some cigarette butts, as I mentioned, that presumably were thrown down the hole from the rooftop. Don't know how they'd get there otherwise.
 
WTC Dust said:
It's time to be goofy about 9/11. Or is it still too soon for you?
Click to expand...

I lost a very dear friend in the North Tower that day. She was 23, a newlywed, had a seven-month-old baby, and her entire life in front of her. And just like that, she was gone. Perhaps the events of that day are an academic abstraction to you; but to me, and to a number of others who post here, they are all too real.

As much as I would enjoy infracting you, I can't; you have the right to express your opinion, no matter how offensive it is to me personally. I will say, though, that the quoted comment probably offended me more than anything else I have read in my four and a half years on this forum.

I'll leave the moderation of this thread to others. I am quite sure I can no longer be objective where this particular poster is concerned.
 
dtugg said:
I did. Apparently you are not lying about having a PhD. The University of Texas must have exceptionally low standards.
Click to expand...

Yay! I'm so excited you're admitting that I'm not lying about my doctorate degree. Woosh. I was worried about that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom