Split Thread The atom bomb attacks on Japan were faked

Anders Lindman said:
I just looked at the Prince Charles attack briefly but it looks very suspicious how suddenly all the security people in black suits jump up from their chairs. Why did they wait so long until they reacted?

The Pearl Harbor attack was a false flag attack in the sense that the Japanese government cooperated with the U.S. government, including helping the U.S. government to fake two atom bomb explosions. We ordinary people have been so gullible for so long. It's time to wise up a bit. Big lies all the way...

Posted By: Gaspode
Click to expand...
Go sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here
 
Wow a new level of denial, the denial of nuclear weapons. I'm speechless as someone who was born in Japan I must think, I must imagine that this fellow is the legendary Shirime - (尻目). I will say no more....
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
Yes, basically all the common conspiracy theories out there are a result of controlled opposition. Smokescreens to divert conspiracy believers into endless detours and cul-de-sacs.
Click to expand...

I see... so you don't believe in all conspiracy theories and the ones you don't believe in are actually a conspiracy to divert attention away from the real ones.

I suspect that you are on fairly powerful medication for your problems. And since it's not really very nice to mock sick people, on to ignore you go.
 
Is the Big Lie the bit where you tell us you genuinely believe this sort of garbage because in reality you just love the attention?
 
Anders Lindman said:
No trolling. I'm just teaching people about the Big Lie tactics that we have been swallowing hook, line and sinker for so long.
Click to expand...
You picked the wrong comment for your response.
Are you working on more replies for this thread or did you just skip acknowledging the posts that showed that you're the one who is receiving an education?
 
The true "big lie" is that the "real" Big Lie is actually fake. But the purveyors of the Big Lie, i.e. the Big Liars, don't want you to know that and have been lying to us all to cover up that deception. Which was initially a False Flag cover-up.
 
Zep said:
The true "big lie" is that the "real" Big Lie is actually fake. But the purveyors of the Big Lie, i.e. the Big Liars, don't want you to know that and have been lying to us all to cover up that deception. Which was initially a False Flag cover-up.
Click to expand...

Aaah. That's what the lizards want you to think.
 
aaaand someone just went onto ignore.

Ages ago I posted a thread about what I thought was the dumbest conspiracy ever. It was a frothing and beyond stupid anti-semite claiming the A-bombs were faked. It was in a very obscure forum.

Now the stupid is on our doorstep. I will not be part of this.
 
Zep said:
The true "big lie" is that the "real" Big Lie is actually fake. But the purveyors of the Big Lie, i.e. the Big Liars, don't want you to know that and have been lying to us all to cover up that deception. Which was initially a False Flag cover-up.
Click to expand...

The truth is probably more like what a person working for an intelligence agency told Richard Hoagland; something like: The lie is different on each level.
 
Re the OP - Not a new idea by any stretch. See "The Jesus Factor", a novel by Edwin Corley published in 1984.
 
Let me get this straight:

We made up a weapon called the "nuclear bomb." In order to make people think such a weapon exists, we use conventional means to create the exact same amount of destruction, then said a nuke was responsible for said destruction.

If we can level a city, we can level a city, what's the difference between an "atom bomb" and bombs that do just the same amount of damage from the perspective of these mysterious conspirators?
 
Last edited:
Care to explain how people were dying for many many years AFtER the attacks from rdiation poisoning?
 
Anders Lindman said:
Zep said:
The true "big lie" is that the "real" Big Lie is actually fake. But the purveyors of the Big Lie, i.e. the Big Liars, don't want you to know that and have been lying to us all to cover up that deception. Which was initially a False Flag cover-up.
Click to expand...
The truth is probably more like what a person working for an intelligence agency told Richard Hoagland; something like: The lie is different on each level.
Click to expand...
Non-local hypotheses, are concerned less with the remedy per se, proposing generalised forms of quantum entanglement as the basis for homeopathy’s efficacy. They suggest instantaneous, acausal correlations are somehow established between various combinations of patient, practitioner, and remedy, ultimately leading to an observed change in the patient’s state of health. These ideas are in their infancy and even more controversial than MoW: indeed, to many the idea that quantum theory might be applicable in our macroscopic domain is anathema. The received conventional wisdom is that non-deterministic quantum theory describes the world of sub-atomic particles, atoms and molecules, while deterministic Newtonian (classical) and Einsteinian (relativistic) theories are sufficient for the macroscopic world of material objects. Non-local hypotheses however, have the advantage of being generalisable outside homeopathy to other healing disciplines.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom