How to address cancer?

[alfaniner]

I know!!! Take any post by Bishadi and put it in speech balloons in any Garfield comic strip. We may have a new meme on our hands.

 

[JJM 777]

the pen is far mightier than the sword and false witness is the method that enables the corrupt to overcome the majority.

So your solution to the OP (how to address cancer) is: use your pen, no sword needed?

 

[Andrew Wiggin]

Hi. Cancer? I'm Andrew. Ya got a moment? We need to talk...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There is good in both wingnuts (left or right) as i am neither republican or democrat, theist or atheist, i am a human being just like any other capable of representing themselves.

If you are neither republican or democrat then Bucky Fuller is an empty republican, worse than Genghis Khan. A conventional democrat often falls prey to a fictional republican.

Listen to this! The crooked novelist, herself threw scorpion eggs at Bishadi because Bishadi had tried to originate while crookedness was rampant. After that, many crooked criminals embraced loyality. Poor Bishadi! Left-wingers are like that. When a citizen marries a criminal, their children are honestly dishonest.

Find the wingnuts are the people who use words like 'atheist' and 'communists' and 'anti semitic' etc... etc...... and then try to label another an 'extremist' or 'terrorist' when the foot hold of the bigot is purely, their standing to right and wrong, based on 'their' opinion and methodology of subjective standings.

If find the wingnuts are the people who use words like then Jerry Falwell is more wonderful than Martin Luther King. Reaction is ridiculous.

This is incredible: A fox-like calculater ran away from Bishadi because Bishadi had doubted much. Next, many soft humans embraced hardness. Poor Bishadi! But that's how sceptics are. I must confess that I'm living.

I could claim, a gun is for self defense and culling the herd for food, while the other is, claiming a gun is only good for one thing, murder.

I could claim, a gun is for self defense and culling the herd for food, while t he other is, claiming a gun is only good for one thing, murder. Either you could claim or I am. Hollow wrongdoer! I'll bet you haven't heard this one: Suddenly an appalling scientist who was in distress crooned that depression was interesting. That is good, evil and interesting. By the same token .... Oh forget it!

what makes a bigot irresponsible is not observing both sides to the argument and then rants on a label, to ruin another without comprehending that damage can occur based on their selfish imposition.

Only a hater could reckon that what makes a bigot irresponsible is not observing both sides to the argument and then rants on a label. Juliet probably wouldn't like Hitler.

Let me render my opinion; the pen is far mightier than the sword and false witness is the method that enables the corrupt to overcome the majority.

Listen to this! Bishadi the loafer tried to loaf crookedly. But then Bugsy Siegal ate Bishadi so of course Bishadi threw up on Bugsy Siegal! Poor Bishadi! Loafers are like that. If a politician married a truthsayer, they'd call their child Bugsy Siegal Abraham Lincoln. Here's a hilarious one: Now wait, depression is political. By the same token my image is honest. But when revolting crows wing and fly, their own depression is always determined and unhinged.

 

[The Norseman]

"How to address cancer?"

I would say, "Oh, you're a Cancer? I'm a Leo! Can I buy you a drink?"

Bishadi slapped a stinker who was kicking Bishadi's slug because Leftysergeant the democrat tried to originate hollowly. Next, many hollow stinkers embraced fineness. Shocking, isn't it? Democrats are like that. A foul paragon often falls prey to a happy stinker.

Well, Halfcentaur insisted you were industrious, so there! Roadtoad was industrious too. Industriousness is often found in people like you and Roadtoad.

Did Leftysergeant get it? heh heh.. But seriously: No? What does it mean to have a soul? Maybe this will explain: Once Bishadi was discussing superbness with a stinkbug. Kochanski came along and said "Bishadi, your soul is just an amusement of your body." That reminds me. Lunacy is virtue speeded up and emotion slowed down. Is that true? I guess I'm really not sure. But then, as Nietzsche said, convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.

Certainly not. You must be an obsolete conformist. Is having a soul contagious?

Draining champagne is Bishadi's love. Bolting lamb is Bishadi's desire. By the same token EdipisReks momentarily sees only tomatoes. El bizarro! Bishadi chants to EdipisReks about champagne and lamb yet EdipisReks will observe spinach. What's going on?. EdipisReks skipped to Bishadi's black cottage and started to belittle and enrage Bishadi while Bishadi was chanting about lamb. Simmer down. Because EdipisReks's own black studio was spooky; he hummed worriedly to Bishadi "Do you follow me?" This murdered Bishadi. And a theoretician started to chew some tomatoes. EdipisReks was angry. Momentarily he understood that to spy a spinach is not to watch it. Bishadi knows that champagne and lamb are not spinach. The theoretician does not. Do you follow me? EdipisReks is enraged and tired, anyhow some lettuce would serve him to be expectant while Bishadi slaughtered the theoretician.

Beatrice said you like Satan very much. Satan is busy like you, I'm sure.

Rockefeller might have thought that truth destroys ignorance, but
not Bob Cratchet.

Only a hater could reckon that truth destroys ignorance. Juliet probably wouldn't like Hitler. I'm afraid of enraged church mice.

If only one of such intent then I can see why a loving Juliet would cry rather than face such intent, even though Hitler claimed that truth does destroy ignorance.

If to me this is all a joke but not to you then Khomeini is more spotless than Helen Caldicott. Hmm. Bananas lunatics need George Washington. George Washington had many good qualities, like sanity, but even George Washington was afraid of such intent.

If you did a long time ago then any sentient creature is more fine than Jane Fonda. I don't know many soft computers. I'm sane.

If you are neither republican or democrat then Bucky Fuller is an empty republican, worse than Genghis Khan. A conventional democrat often falls prey to a fictional republican.

Listen to this! The crooked novelist, herself threw scorpion eggs at Bishadi because Bishadi had tried to originate while crookedness was rampant. After that, many crooked criminals embraced loyality. Poor Bishadi! Left-wingers are like that. When a citizen marries a criminal, their children are honestly dishonest.

If find the wingnuts are the people who use words like then Jerry Falwell is more wonderful than Martin Luther King. Reaction is ridiculous.

This is incredible: A fox-like calculater ran away from Bishadi because Bishadi had doubted much. Next, many soft humans embraced hardness. Poor Bishadi! But that's how sceptics are. I must confess that I'm living.

I could claim, a gun is for self defense and culling the herd for food, while t he other is, claiming a gun is only good for one thing, murder. Either you could claim or I am. Hollow wrongdoer! I'll bet you haven't heard this one: Suddenly an appalling scientist who was in distress crooned that depression was interesting. That is good, evil and interesting. By the same token .... Oh forget it!

Only a hater could reckon that what makes a bigot irresponsible is not observing both sides to the argument and then rants on a label. Juliet probably wouldn't like Hitler.

Listen to this! Bishadi the loafer tried to loaf crookedly. But then Bugsy Siegal ate Bishadi so of course Bishadi threw up on Bugsy Siegal! Poor Bishadi! Loafers are like that. If a politician married a truthsayer, they'd call their child Bugsy Siegal Abraham Lincoln. Here's a hilarious one: Now wait, depression is political. By the same token my image is honest. But when revolting crows wing and fly, their own depression is always determined and unhinged.

Okay, forget the OP.

I honestly can't wait for the next installment from Mr. Blaylock here...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Okay, forget the OP.

I honestly can't wait for the next installment from Mr. Blaylock here...

I cannot really take credit for it.

One word: “Racter”.

 

[dasmiller]

I cannot really take credit for it.

One word: “Racter”.

Ah, thanks - I had Racter on my Amiga, back when the Amiga was impressive. Seeing Racter again is much like bumping into an old friend.

Okay, maybe not "friend." More like bumping into the harmless crazy homeless guy who used to wave at you in the morning and then argue with his shopping cart. And lose.

But still a pleasant sense of connection across the decades.

 

[Bishadi]

So your solution to the OP (how to address cancer) is: use your pen, no sword needed?

knowledge destroys ignorance


(ie.. knowledge evolves and the last word, being the name of the boss; math describing the processes of existence (life))

ever read any old literature that could mirror such a claim?

to you life may be a practice run, to me it is far reaching into the future, by choice!

 

[SonOfLaertes]

... snip ...
read more and find many already have labeled me in many flavors (throughout history)
but to address your scope; "beyond anything you ever imagined" (well, unless your religious)
... snip ...

I find the above statements in Bishadi's post #27 interesting.

Bishadi, could you give me a little context to better understand the above statements? Are you special in some way that we have failed to realize so far? Or are the statements above allegorical? If they are allegorical WTF do they could you please give us a more conventional interpretation of the point you were trying to get across?

 

[Bishadi]

I find the above statements in Bishadi's post #27 interesting.

Bishadi, could you give me a little context to better understand the above statements? Are you special in some way that we have failed to realize so far? Or are the statements above allegorical? If they are allegorical WTF do they could you please give us a more conventional interpretation of the point you were trying to get across?

I wondered if someone would see that.

My best advice would be to read a bit to address the questions most important to you. ie.... what is it that i represent as an underlying theme (to enable) versus me having to say anything about 'ME'..... (the sense is; what if the material is correct, what would it mean to mankind?)

You make your own determination from there.

forget me.

and think on the material and what it would mean. Then go do, what make sense to you! (be honest with yourself and that is all anyone owes you)

 

[bruto]

If mankind is observed as a body of the species homo sapien, then if the body of mankind has over the years created knowledge for the next generation to comprehend, then how would the rogue men/women who care nothing but of themselves be considered?


Could a group of self centered people be considered a cancer if they take resources from the total, simply for their own desires, needs and selfish pursuits? Does equality fit into a scheme in which the rogue could be practically killing the body?


Can any assist in the medical treatment on "How to address cancer?"

I think the first step here would be to learn to distinguish between reality and metaphor.

Maybe we should just cut to the chase and redefine the holy land as the world's pancreas.

 

[Bishadi]

I think the first step here would be to learn to distinguish between reality and metaphor.

for example; evidence (archeology) trumps beliefs?

If so, i'm in!

Maybe we should just cut to the chase and redefine the holy land as the world's pancreas.

I rather look at it as babylon, myself. (lots of prostitution going-on affecting mankind; misleadings)

how about noticing that stupid hill (the mount) the three ladies (abrahamic religions) are fighting over and each side has nuclear weapons on their backs and if ww3 was to start (armegeddon), then a war over that mount (etymology to megiddo is 'the hill' (mount)) would just be practically hilarious!

now talk about combining a metaphor to reality in our time period????

Aint that one a kick in the behind???

Then read dan 7:8 and find what a kick it all really is.


i didn't write the stuff, i just read and sometimes dig in to find out what applies to what as if we live in 'the time'.

and then the only real reason is not that i like the nasties but because if a person did walk around, that could define life to the last word, then what does it all mean as a combination of knowledge?


i said Oh **** the first time i recognized the scope.

how about you?

 

[The Norseman]

I cannot really take credit for it.

One word: “Racter”.

Hahaha! Well done, sir!

I guess that's the ultimate problem with using computers for this sort of thing: no matter how hard you try to program them, they still can end up making more sense than humans.

 

[JJM 777]

Just fitting some small pieces into the puzzle here...

Then read dan 7:8 and find what a kick it all really is.
i didn't write the stuff, i just read and sometimes dig in to find out what applies to what as if we live in 'the time'.

So we live in "the time", Biblical End Times? And the prophecies of the Bible, such as Dan 7:8, will be fulfilled sometime soon?

I rather look at it as babylon, myself. (lots of prostitution going-on affecting mankind; misleadings)

So prostitution is categorically wrong? Just a penny for this statement.

(etymology to megiddo is 'the hill' (mount))

My sources tell that it is the Har, not the Megiddo, in HarMegiddo that means "hill" in Hebrew language.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

knowledge destroys ignorance


(ie.. knowledge evolves and the last word, being the name of the boss; math describing the processes of existence (life))

ever read any old literature that could mirror such a claim?

No. It's false that I have ever read any old literature that could mirror such a claim.

Have you heard about Ivan the Terrible? You'll be amazed! Idleness is what all wrongdoers try when they cut off the ears of canaries because Ivan the Terrible had sinned much. Next, many idle loafers embraced industriousness. Shocking, isn't it? Sinners are like that.

to you life may be a practice run, to me it is far reaching into the future, by choice!

Apple might have thought that to me life may be a practice run, but not Adam. Would you say Jessica Mitford is correct? Adam wouldn't.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

I rather look at it as babylon, myself. (lots of prostitution going-on affecting mankind; misleadings)

If you rather look at it as babylon then any sentient creature is more fine than Jane Fonda. I don't know many soft programmers.

A communist is conventional because those who guess ROMS compute Jack the Ripper. For another reason, one needn't disdain fascinatingness. I don't know many stoned citizens.

how about noticing that stupid hill (the mount) the three ladies (abrahamic religions) are fighting over and each side has nuclear weapons on their backs and if ww3 was to start (armegeddon), then a war over that mount (etymology to megiddo is 'the hill' (mount)) would just be practically hilarious!

now talk about combining a metaphor to reality in our time period????

Aint that one a kick in the behind???

Listen to this! Dante, along with other poets, ate a versifyer, so naturally indifferentness is what all poets try when they throw up on angelfish. Then Dante's gorilla threw up on Babbitt, then ate himself. Shocking, isn't it? But what would you expect from a poet? Babbitt probably wouldn't like Marie Antoinette. Achoo! Oh, here's a great one! Gung-ho enthusiasm and bored apathy are captivating, but an enthusiast or a bore never hums them determinedly. A cosmologist hums: Prepare for a fascinating essay or dissertation. The gung-ho essay is fascinating, at all events a bore might also sing the same dissertation. Right?

Then read dan 7:8 and find what a kick it all really is.


i didn't write the stuff, i just read and sometimes dig in to find out what applies to what as if we live in 'the time'.

and then the only real reason is not that i like the nasties but because if a person did walk around, that could define life to the last word, then what does it all mean as a combination of knowledge?

I don't know what it does all mean as a combination of knowledge. Bishadi the plutocrat. Cough. Let me tell you something about poverty. Weirdness is virtue speeded up and flesh slowed down. Is that true? I guess I'm really not sure. But then, as Nietzsche said, convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies.

 

[SezMe]

... can you find one line on this thread, that is not using the english language? Can you copy and paste one line item that you do not comprehend?

Sure, I'd be happy to accommodate your humble request. I offer you the OP:

If mankind is observed as a body of the species homo sapien, then if the body of mankind has over the years created knowledge for the next generation to comprehend, then how would the rogue men/women who care nothing but of themselves be considered?


Could a group of self centered people be considered a cancer if they take resources from the total, simply for their own desires, needs and selfish pursuits? Does equality fit into a scheme in which the rogue could be practically killing the body?


Can any assist in the medical treatment on "How to address cancer?"

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Because if the questions were subject specific then they could be given an answer.

ie.... can you find one line on this thread, that is not using the english language? Can you copy and paste one line item that you do not comprehend?

I can. Of course. Yes. Copy and paste one line item that I do not comprehend, that is.

How about reversing that: It seems the audiance dont want to read material that does not conform to what they believe and rant about not comprehending the language, i wonder why that would be?

It's probably impossible. Let me think. How is it that an atheist is unbelieving? Because smart things occur. Also, probably because the condemners insist on it.

Be sure to reply with answers to the questions and the thread OP in the sense of maintaining a coherance of dialogue otherwise buy a dictionary and find this peckerwood is about as american and firmly grounded as you could want to be.

Only a right-winger could reckon that this peckerwood is about as american and firmly grounded as I could want to be. Bucky Fuller probably wouldn't like Phyllis Schlafly.

 

[SonOfLaertes]

I wondered if someone would see that.

My best advice would be to read a bit to address the questions most important to you. ie.... what is it that i represent as an underlying theme (to enable) versus me having to say anything about 'ME'..... (the sense is; what if the material is correct, what would it mean to mankind?)

You make your own determination from there.

forget me.

and think on the material and what it would mean. Then go do, what make sense to you! (be honest with yourself and that is all anyone owes you)

So in other words, no, you can't shed any light on the post in question.

Bishadi, can we set up a thread where we ask you a few questions and you actually, you know, answer them? You would only have to do this in that one thread - we promise that you can continue posting word salad in every other thread. It's just that a few responses from you in comprehensible English would go a long way towards ...

Actually, I'm not sure at all that it would accomplish anything, but one never knows until one tries.

What say?

 

[Bishadi]

Just fitting some small pieces into the puzzle here...


So we live in "the time", Biblical End Times? And the prophecies of the Bible, such as Dan 7:8, will be fulfilled sometime soon?

what does it say?

So prostitution is categorically wrong? Just a penny for this statement.

misleading or lying is a prostitution between people (wrong)

ie...no one has a right to lie (false witness)

My sources tell that it is the Har, not the Megiddo, in HarMegiddo that means "hill" in Hebrew language.

lots of interpretations have changed over time.

tel megiddo is 'the hill'

and which three religions on this earth are in contest over the mount (where the dome of the rock sits)?

Which three are all bound to the abrahamic foundations (genesis/creation)?

And if you know judaism, then you would know they intend to build a temple (solomons/davids) on that site, then rebuild the alter and sacrafice lambs, for messiah to return (end times prophecy of judaism). That is what zionism/judaism is about.

And that is why israel was created in palestine and why the 1967' land grab, encircled jeruselem, they want that MOUNT (the hill).



Now imagine, if they took it by force.



Then since the eastern folk have watched terrrorism and the divide over this situation for over 70 years, in which as of now a 1.3million soul concentration camp still exists (gaza) and people are blowing up towers with planes strapped to their arse.................... if ONE firecracker pops over that divide, the east (china/russia/india) will level the island nation (old prophecy before the US was even born)......


'we the people' are the fools that paid for this ignorance and the world is under a huge religious divide because of it.


So if 'we the people' cannot stop it, the rest of the world will combine to shut down the monster (invisible hand) paying for it (to keep as much radiation on this side of the lake as possible).


Then to get crazy, go read up on the doomsday mare of hindu/buddhism. And tell me if that thing is not a nuclear sub. (the black serpant from the sea that rises to spit fire that rains upon the land)


Maybe i am whacked, but not many have covered as much material as i do.


For example, if i was an evengelical i could scare the **** out of people, and then have the audacity to tell them, "when you sleep it is like practicing death, you aint going anywhere when you physically die".



p/s,...... have you ever experienced deja vu? If so, then you must know it is possible to see what hasnt happend yet.