How to address cancer?

RussDill said:
I dunno, I've heard language before talking about "a group" being "a cancer" upon the rest of humanity.
Click to expand...

What have you given to assist others today?

Especially in relation to greed and wealth,
Click to expand...

are you defending your preferred values?

Heck, if i was like you, i would have sharks with laser beams attached to their heads by now.

it generally refers to the Jews.
Click to expand...
How it that?

i dont specify greed and selfishness to any specifically because we are all just as capable.

It fits in well with his commentary about Israel too.
Click to expand...

The comment on israel was to specify how some believe a lie over reality.

UN is who voted Israel to become a country. UN resolutions 476 and 478 render that Jeruselem is not Israel. If you dont know the truth, then you would not comprehend that i was not punning israel but the idiots who believe BS before comprehending reality (what is real)



Again, you post trying to discredit.

ie.... your intent is not honorable, just self reflecting selfishness.

And if the selfish are the cancer; then how do you address it?






.
 
RussDill said:
That really isn't any of your business. If you wish to address the individual rather than the argument, I'd kindly refer you to Rule 12.
Click to expand...

that is a priceless post.........................


ie... can you address the thread then rather than me?
 
Bishadi said:
Heck, if i was like you, i would have sharks with laser beams attached to their heads by now.
Click to expand...

Telling line, that.

I should say this thread jumped the shark with the OP.

It seems clear that no rational argument or commentary will be forthcoming.

By the way, I think it's meant to be frickin sharks with laser beams.
 
Okay, Bishadi, I'll make it simple for you: Is English your native language, yes or no? If English isn't your native language, what is?
 
Centaurs regularly integrate with human women, this leads to a degrading social norm. If someone is smarter than someone else, they can either be polite or force themselves to exploit the society of their neighbor. There are fleeting messages of one kind or another being bandied.
 
Bishadi said:
that is a priceless post.........................


ie... can you address the thread then rather than me?
Click to expand...

Sickle cell anemia, there. What is actually nothing difference of your VERY life into works is putting a guilt trip into the unveiling!
 
I put Bashadi on "ignore" some time ago. For those who lack the patience to deal with his kind of nonsense, I recommend the same action. I makes these threads more interesting and enjoyable.
 
Bishadi said:
If mankind is observed as a body of the species homo sapien, then if the body of mankind has over the years created knowledge for the next generation to comprehend, then how would the rogue men/women who care nothing but of themselves be considered?


Could a group of self centered people be considered a cancer if they take resources from the total, simply for their own desires, needs and selfish pursuits? Does equality fit into a scheme in which the rogue could be practically killing the body?


Can any assist in the medical treatment on "How to address cancer?"
Click to expand...

Uhm, go see an oncologist?
 
commandlinegamer said:
Telling line, that.

I should say this thread jumped the shark with the OP.

It seems clear that no rational argument or commentary will be forthcoming.

By the way, I think it's meant to be frickin sharks with laser beams.
Click to expand...

could you imagine me, as nasty as i am being a Dr. Evil?

all i can say, is be glad i am on the other side.

but then again, just imagine how many of the COMPLACENT find the awakening of realizing, that personal responsibility is a life and death proposition
 
I'm concerned that the OP seems to be building a justification for killing people that he feels are holding back progress by adhering to conventional physics.

Bishadi, am I wildly off the mark, or is that the case?
 
dasmiller said:
I'm concerned that the OP seems to be building a justification for killing people
Click to expand...
Calling some humans "cancer of the society" and calling for a "solution" is a disguised call to a violent uprising. Nothing new, Communists have been teaching so for more than a century. But Bishadi claims that he is not a radical left winger. But he didn´t complain about any errors in my interpretation of his OP either.
 
JJM 777 said:
Calling some humans "cancer of the society" and calling for a "solution" is a disguised call to a violent uprising. Nothing new, Communists have been teaching so for more than a century. But Bishadi claims that he is not a radical left winger. But he didn´t complain about any errors in my interpretation of his OP either.
Click to expand...

I'd say that the extreme right hand of the political spectrum has used these arguments as well, so he could also be a radical right winger.
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
I'd say that the extreme right hand of the political spectrum has used these arguments as well, so he could also be a radical right winger.
Click to expand...

and then what did i mention in my rebuttal to the 777?


That i am neither.


There is good in both wingnuts (left or right) as i am neither republican or democrat, theist or atheist, i am a human being just like any other capable of representing themselves.

Find the wingnuts are the people who use words like 'atheist' and 'communists' and 'anti semitic' etc... etc...... and then try to label another an 'extremist' or 'terrorist' when the foot hold of the bigot is purely, their standing to right and wrong, based on 'their' opinion and methodology of subjective standings.


I could claim, a gun is for self defense and culling the herd for food, while the other is, claiming a gun is only good for one thing, murder.

what makes a bigot irresponsible is not observing both sides to the argument and then rants on a label, to ruin another without comprehending that damage can occur based on their selfish imposition.


Let me render my opinion; the pen is far mightier than the sword and false witness is the method that enables the corrupt to overcome the majority.




.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom