• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
triforcharity said:
It most likely was. It could have been one of the S&R guys, or one of the other hundreds of people who were authorized to be inside the area.

Hell, it could have been any one of my good friends who were there.

Do you have a point?
Click to expand...

This is not the kind of thing I am pepared to argue with debunkers. Much better to present the same picture to concerned citizens and see what they think.
 
Bill Smith, Do I take it from your above posts that you think that somehow the steel of the columns disappeared after the buildings fell or even as they were falling?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Bill Smith, Do I take it from your above posts that you think that somehow the steel of the columns disappeared after the buildings fell or even as they were falling?
Click to expand...

And a sizeable proportion of them went even before the buildings fell in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Where did they go?

Steel isn't noted for it's ability to disappear without some kind of help.
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Where did they go?

Steel isn't noted for it's ability to disappear.
Click to expand...

I have a theory that I have laid out a number of times. But I am still attracted by the Judy Woods theories. The coincidence of the hurricane being off the New York coast on and before 9/11 without any mention of it being made on the morning news on 9/11- not even a graphic - intrigues me. Also the Space station passed overhead and commiserated with New Yorkers on the tragedy including descriptions of how the smoke was blowing- but without mentioning the hurricane that must have been clearly visible to them.
 
Last edited:
WHat has any of that got to do with steel disappearing?

Where do you think it went?
 
bill smith said:
Lol. I's love to know who painted in day-glo paint 'God bless the FDNY amd the PDNY ' But we have to remember that these cheap tricks were aimed at a population who were in the kind of catetonia induced by the 'shock and awe' that the perps had laid on them. They even went for 'They are coming to take our freedom' ansd they are coming to murder us in our beds'.
Click to expand...

Obviously someone who was there helping in the cleanup. That's marker paint. Normally they use it to mark where gas lines and things are in the streets in NY. You see them a lot here. On 9/11 they used it to tell people areas were searched and cleared.

You're disgusting to suggest it was something other than a person reacting to the atrocity that lay before them and the sacrifice those people made to help save countless others.

**** you
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I have a theory that I have laid out a number of times. But I am still attracted by the Judy Woods theories. The coincidence of the hurricane being off the New York coast on and before 9/11 without any mention of it being made on the morning news on 9/11- not even a graphic - intrigues me. Also the Space station passed overhead and commiserated with New Yorkers on the tragedy including descriptions of how the smoke was blowing- but without mentioning the hurricane that must have been clearly visible to them.
Click to expand...

Yeah, lets look at a hurricane that was predicted to not hit, and ignore the unfolding events in Manhattan.

Yeah, that's just what newspeople should have done....

"We interrupt this breaking news to tell you that a hurricane will NOT hit NY."

:rolleyes:
 
triforcharity said:
Yeah, lets look at a hurricane that was predicted to not hit, and ignore the unfolding events in Manhattan.

Yeah, that's just what newspeople should have done....

"We interrupt this breaking news to tell you that a hurricane will NOT hit NY."

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Would it make a difference to you if I was talking about weathercasts from before the first plane ?
 
Greetings again!

I have a twoofer who claims that Stevens Jones tested paint samples from the WTC towers and found them to be different from his "nanothermite" samples.

Here -- for the umpteenth time - -is the link.
http://communitycurrency.org/911TV/

In the video Jones explains in detail how his team checked out the claim about the paint. They were able to obtain and test a sample of red primer paint from the WTC. An artist had created a sculpture from some WTC columns. The artist scraped off a large sample of red paint from the steel and sent it to Jones. BTW the artist has since become a truther.

The chemistry of the paint was different from that of the chips found in the dust. Period. End of story.
Click to expand...

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showpost.php?p=2988238&postcount=74

I hope this hasn't been addressed on this thread already (I haven't read through the entire thread), but I was wondering if any of you guys know anything about this?

(Yes it's Gaffney again:rolleyes:)
 
there is a piece of WTC steel at the Staten Island Botanical Garden.

how come it was not turned into dust?

two of the tritons from the WTC towers will be part of the Memorial museum.

how come they were not turned to dust?

the 9-11 steel cross, is still on display a block north from GZ.

how come it was not turned to dust?

there is still damage from 9-11, on the building just south and on the west side, of the WTC. this building is along the West Side Highway.

this damage could not have been caused by dust. it was caused by a solid object.

how come this solid object was not turned to dust?
 
With so much steel dustified I'm surprised the steel companies that bought WTC steel for recycling haven't complained about their shipments coming in light. I mean, if I'd paid for 70,000 tonnes of steel I'd expect to receive that amount.

I'm sure ship captains would also notice that their vessels were riding higher in the water than they should be too. It only remains for the dedicated proponents of the dustification theory to chase up all the scrap shipment records to prove their case for missing steel.


;)
 
Reactor drone said:
With so much steel dustified I'm surprised the steel companies that bought WTC steel for recycling haven't complained about their shipments coming in light. I mean, if I'd paid for 70,000 tonnes of steel I'd expect to receive that amount.

I'm sure ship captains would also notice that their vessels were riding higher in the water than they should be too. It only remains for the dedicated proponents of the dustification theory to chase up all the scrap shipment records to prove their case for missing steel.


;)
Click to expand...

Even if the steel was turned to dust wouldn't the dust weigh the same as the steel it came from? Did the DEW actually make matter vanish?
 
tsig said:
Even if the steel was turned to dust wouldn't the dust weigh the same as the steel it came from? Did the DEW actually make matter vanish?
Click to expand...

With a much higher surface area and oxidation I'm sure iron dust would end up weighing more than the original steel. I'm not sure there there's much of a market for a truckload of rust though.
 
triforcharity said:
How about these?

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/FEMAphoto_WTC-135.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/FEMAphoto_WTC-128.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/FEMAphoto_WTC-103.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/FEMAphoto_WTC-100.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/FEMAphoto_WTC-038.jpg[/qimg]

All faked eh? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

None of that rebar is cut or melted. No evidence of thermite or cutter charges.

And certainly no evidence of 'dustified' steel. No examples of partially dustified steel.

Truthers literally see things that aren't there. You might as well be chasing a ghost with these fact-free Truther theories.
 
WTC Dust continues to run away from the fact that at least 100,000 tons of steel was sold to China and India.

Those customers must've been pissed when they discovered they'd been duped and sold steel dust instead!
 
bill smith said:
Are you just a sack of organs and guts or can I assume that you are held erect by an internal skeleton ? There is an analogy there if you look for it.
Click to expand...

How do you know that the twin towers weren't held erect by a secret NWO antigravity beam? Since the towers didn't move up or down, no work would be performed. So in theory, such a device might require no energy at all. This makes it more energetically possible than a device which would preferentially overcome the surface energy of steel, turning it to dust.

Of course, once a floor or two did move up or down, the circuitry might not be able to handle the change in potential energy. Then, of course, the whole building would come down, since the aluminum cladding, while having some strength, was really just there as a power distribution system.

The huge gravitational potential energy of the building might even wind up melting the secret device. Or perhaps that was a deliberate design for a failsafe self-destruct so no one could recover the device.

In that case, though, you'd probably have people claiming that there was a big melted lump of metal of some kind found in the basement during the cleanup.

Can you prove it didn't happen that way?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom