leftysergeant
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2007
- Messages
- 18,863
Sorry, I thought I had addressed this in one of the posts moved to AAH. Double post deleted.
Last edited:
Oh, so it's not on Alex Jones' website?
There aren't enough facepalms on the internet to cover that response.
Please stop using Nazi imagery to describe conservatives. Lefty might think he's not needed anymore.But please, continue to believe that it's alright to lie because the evil right-wing brownshirts are coming to get you.
I need to correct something I posted and it goes to answering this nonsense as well.How would you like to have a sign shoved in your face as is clearly seen in that video? Did you even look at the video, GB, before responding to me?
I would prefer a "sign shoved" in my face to being pushed on the ground and have someone put his shoe on my shoulder and step down with it.
Apparently she just wanted Paul to see her sign, not get a photo of the sign with Paul in the image as I mistakenly said earlier.
She said she had no interaction with Paul's supporters before the rally, and just wanted to get a photo with Paul holding a sign that said "employee of the month award."
But I just watched the video piece before she was thrown to the ground. She held the sign up to the open car window of the car Paul was riding in.
I would prefer a "sign shoved" in my face to being pushed on the ground and have someone put his shoe on my shoulder and step down with it.
"What happened was when they realized that I was there, they actually formed a circle behind me and then as the car pulled up - before Rand was even out of the car - … they stepped in front of me," Valle said. "So I stepped off the curb and around them. And then they actually pursued me around the car.
That may be what she's now claiming in a CBS interview linked below, but that's not what she apparently told the press earlier:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...d_myself_from_rand_pauls_tea_party_suppo.html
Looks like her story is changing, SG.
That's obviously false, too, as the video I linked clearly shows her not holding the sign up to the open car window but trying to shove it deep inside.
Assault is still assault, regardless of whether it's a foot or a sign.
By the way, Valle lied several other times in her CBS interview: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/10/27/earlyshow/main6995613.shtml when she stated
That's very clearly a lie. The video clearly shows her in the middle of a group of Rand supporters but none of them appear to be paying any attention to her. Then as the car pulls up we see her step off the curb and race to the car ahead of anyone else. Some other sign carrying Rand Paul fans follow her towards the car but they do not appear to have intervened on what she was doing. It was a grey suited security guard who ran into the picture to force her away from the window and car. And then after she and her sign were pulled from the window of the car, she ran away around the back of the car to the other side, with no one in pursuit. The grey suited security guard remains by the window and so do all the other sign carrying Rand Paul supporters who were seen standing near the window when she was trying to shove her sign into the car. In short, she is a baldfaced liar.
The next time we see her, she is running round the front of the car again like a maniac toward where Rand Paul is standing. There doesn't appear to be anyone following her. She's stopped by a security guard in front of her and you can then see her trying to evade and get around him. Don't you just hate video evidence that proves leftist wackos like Valle are liars, SG?
C'mon.. curb stomping is the proper punishment for annoying someone with a sign.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb-stomp
if you wish to see what a curb stomp REALLY looks like...go to you tube and look up "curb stomp american history X"
TAM![]()
That's very clearly a lie. The video clearly shows her in the middle of a group of Rand supporters but none of them appear to be paying any attention to her. Then as the car pulls up we see her step off the curb and race to the car ahead of anyone else. Some other sign carrying Rand Paul fans follow her towards the car but they do not appear to have intervened on what she was doing. It was a grey suited security guard who ran into the picture to force her away from the window and car. And then after she and her sign were pulled from the window of the car, she ran away around the back of the car to the other side, with no one in pursuit. The grey suited security guard remains by the window and so do all the other sign carrying Rand Paul supporters who were seen standing near the window when she was trying to shove her sign into the car. In short, she is a baldfaced liar.
The next time we see her, she is running round the front of the car again like a maniac toward where Rand Paul is standing. There doesn't appear to be anyone following her. She's stopped by a security guard in front of her and you can then see her trying to evade and get around him. Don't you just hate video evidence that proves leftist wackos like Valle are liars, SG?
Yes, all very excellent points. It's important to remember that when a woman is violently assaulted by two men we have too determine what kind of woman she is. As BAC pointed out, this woman is clearly a liar and a leftist wacko, and perhaps women who lie and vote Democrat deserve to be violently assaulted. Also, what was she wearing? Did her choice of attire somehow entice these men to push her to the ground and stomp on her? These are important questions we must ask ourselves before we can fully understand the moral ambiguity of two men violently assaulting a woman.
Please stop using Nazi imagery to describe conservatives. Lefty might think he's not needed anymore.
oh, wait...
You are on the wrong side here, BAC. You really should think about that.That may be what she's now claiming in a CBS interview linked below, but that's not what she apparently told the press earlier:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...d_myself_from_rand_pauls_tea_party_suppo.html
Looks like her story is changing, SG.
That's obviously false, too, as the video I linked clearly shows her not holding the sign up to the open car window but trying to shove it deep inside.
Assault is still assault, regardless of whether it's a foot or a sign.
By the way, Valle lied several other times in her CBS interview: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/10/27/earlyshow/main6995613.shtml when she stated
That's very clearly a lie. The video clearly shows her in the middle of a group of Rand supporters but none of them appear to be paying any attention to her. Then as the car pulls up we see her step off the curb and race to the car ahead of anyone else. Some other sign carrying Rand Paul fans follow her towards the car but they do not appear to have intervened on what she was doing. It was a grey suited security guard who ran into the picture to force her away from the window and car. And then after she and her sign were pulled from the window of the car, she ran away around the back of the car to the other side, with no one in pursuit. The grey suited security guard remains by the window and so do all the other sign carrying Rand Paul supporters who were seen standing near the window when she was trying to shove her sign into the car. In short, she is a baldfaced liar.
The next time we see her, she is running round the front of the car again like a maniac toward where Rand Paul is standing. There doesn't appear to be anyone following her. She's stopped by a security guard in front of her and you can then see her trying to evade and get around him. Don't you just hate video evidence that proves leftist wackos like Valle are liars, SG?
I loved your post but it needed a tiny correction. It's the Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party.Yes, all very excellent points. It's important to remember that when a woman is violently assaulted by two men we have too determine what kind of woman she is. As BAC pointed out, this woman is clearly a liar and a leftist wacko, and perhaps women who lie and voteDemocrat[Democratic] deserve to be violently assaulted. Also, what was she wearing? Did her choice of attire somehow entice these men to push her to the ground and stomp on her? These are important questions we must ask ourselves before we can fully understand the moral ambiguity of two men violently assaulting a woman.
If no cameras were around, who knows what they would've done..