WTC dust

[dtugg]

I do not have definitive proof of any electrical weapon.

Of course you don't. It is not possible to prove something that didn't happen.

I have only forensic evidence that rules out gravity and explosives.

No you don't. If you had such evidence, you would present it. But you can't present it since you don't have it.

I haven't even proved an electrical weapon did it, yet, not to mention that I haven't found the exact weapon.

For the very good reason that it doesn't exist.

Normal people aren't highly educated and creative, like Dr. Wood and me. Normal people like to watch football and purchase shiny objects. Count me out.

Normal people aren't mentally ill.

 

[beachnut]

... I have only forensic evidence that rules out gravity and explosives. ...

That is a lie.

Where are you hiding the evidence. So far you have only talk, talk of moronic delusions? Post your evidence. You don't have evidence.

You are not a research scientist, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist, spreading lies and delusions about 911.

 

[WTC Dust]

Right the dust used to be steel but now it is not steel, it is dust that is not steel dust. What did Fe turn into, super research scientist? Fe dust, or use to be Fe, now some sort of super not steel but some kind of dust stuff?

Still waiting for the kinetic energy formula. Found it yet?

Book em dano

Steel is not iron. Iron was found. Steel is a particular formulation of chemicals that includes iron and carbon and other trace elements heated and treated certain ways.

The iron that was found used to be caught up in the steel, but the steel got pulverized down to the elements, which results in iron being detected.

Why are you asking me for the formula for kinetic energy? I'm not your monkey, and I don't dance at the tip of anyone's finger. Find it yourself and tell me why you think it's important.

 

[lionking]

Normal people aren't highly educated and creative, like Dr. Wood and me.

Now I know that this is a parody thread.

 

[dtugg]

The iron that was found used to be caught up in the steel, but the steel got pulverized down to the elements, which results in iron being detected.

Prove it, twoofer.

Shockingly, you have posted no evidence whatsoever. I wonder why that is.

 

[332nd]

"Who"? Um...lotsa people?

Um... lotsa people like whom?

Do you make the claim that the dust was entirely concrete?

No.

I say no, and that is my point.

Ah... I've seen baseball bats with finer points but... K.

The dust was steel and all the rest of the contents of the WTC buildings, not just the concrete.

And....?

 

[WTC Dust]

That is a lie.

Where are you hiding the evidence. So far you have only talk, talk of moronic delusions? Post your evidence. You don't have evidence.

You are not a research scientist, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist, spreading lies and delusions about 911.

Oh, Beachnut. You're so persistent. I'm already starting to like you. Bashing my credentials really isn't going to work out for you, because I'm solid. Try debunking the science, kk? Or actually, what I'd like you to do is to debunk the science of Dr. Judy Wood, or try to. Insults don't actually debunk anything, by the way, although they seem to make you feel good about yourself.

 

[WTC Dust]

Um... lotsa people like whom?

No.

Ah... I've seen baseball bats with finer points but... K.


And....?

I'm just talking. If you don't like it, you can read other posts.

 

[WTC Dust]

Normal people aren't mentally ill.

Hey man, if 9/11 didn't get under your skin, I don't know why else you'd be posting in this section of the JREF forums. I haven't actually presented any evidence at all, and you're already insulting me.

Wait for the candy, then eat it.

 

[CompusMentus]

Why are you asking me for the formula for kinetic energy? I'm not your monkey, and I don't dance at the tip of anyone's finger. Find it yourself and tell me why you think it's important.

I bet you don't answer "gotcha" questions too.

Right?


Compus

 

[332nd]

I'm just talking. If you don't like it, you can read other posts.

So you posted a bunch of stuff you can't back up. Why?

 

[dtugg]

Hey man, if 9/11 didn't get under your skin, I don't know why else you'd be posting in this section of the JREF forums.

For the free comedy crazy ass twoofers provide.

I haven't actually presented any evidence at all,

Nor will you.

and you're already insulting me.

Just calling a spade a spade.

 

[Arus808]

you do know that there were other elements in and 110 story OFFICE BUILDING that contains IRON right?

chair
cabinets
sinks
plumbing
elevators
cables


tghe list is endless.

so what is the "suspicious" nature here?

 

[WTC Dust]

Steel was turned to dust; nonsense, insane claim.

Some people who post at JREF have seen the dust, and know saying it is steel is insane.

When you say they've "seen" the dust, what exactly do you mean?
They saw it in the hands of another person? They touched it with their own hands? They studied it using various technology? I'm interested.

 

[Reactor drone]

You shouldn't make assumptions about me. I've smoked a cigarette or two in my day, of the herbal variety.

Paper is paper. It ignites when it reaches a certain temperature. I'm not saying anything controversial in this.

Hey man, if 9/11 didn't get under your skin, I don't know why else you'd be posting in this section of the JREF forums. I haven't actually presented any evidence at all, and you're already insulting me.

Wait for the candy, then eat it.

Maybe you shouldn't smoke the "herbal" cigarettes before you post.

 

[WTC Dust]

So you posted a bunch of stuff you can't back up. Why?

"Can't" isn't the same thing as "Haven't yet". Get it straight.
I joined this group a few hours ago.

 

[dtugg]

If WTC Dust provides proof that steel in the WTC was "dustified," into Fe and C I will leave this subforum forever.

 

[332nd]

"Can't" isn't the same thing as "Haven't yet". Get it straight.
I joined this group a few hours ago.

Could've right there but ya didn't... cuz ya can't.

 

[TexasJack]

OK. I tend to believe all the peer reviewed papers that mention the iron that was found in the dust and I'm not talking about Steven Jones' ridiculous non-peer reviewed travesty of a paper, either.

Can you please point out these peer reviewed papers that support your theory? Something along the lines of "Iron Found In WTC Samples Prove Space Beams Caused The Destruction of The Towers" by Dr. Wood and Dr. Dust. Journal of Wacky Science, December 2005, Vol. II.

 

[WTC Dust]

you do know that there were other elements in and 110 story OFFICE BUILDING that contains IRON right?

chair
cabinets
sinks
plumbing
elevators
cables


tghe list is endless.

so what is the "suspicious" nature here?

What I see as very suspicious is the amount of dust. Also, the very short pile of debris at Ground Zero. Almost nothing was visible above a ten foot fence from ground level on Day 3 after the attacks. They say all that steel got shipped to China, but there wasn't a convincingly large pile of steel at Ground Zero. I've never seen anything resembling direct evidence that steel was shipped to China, only stories.

Instead, you had all this dust every place. Dust appeared at ground level before either of the Twin Towers went poof. You can see it on Rick Seigel's video and many other images. Both buildings standing, yet whitish dust rising from ground level. No concrete floors bashing into each other could cause this to happen. The lobby of my building was filled with dust before either building fell. Explain this, concrete-dusters!