WTC dust

[WTC Dust]

ETA: Someone has altered the appearance of my profile in this thread. I'm no student. I'm a research scientist.
ETA: Oh, I guess it has to do with how many posts you've made. NEVER MIND!

One of the most misunderstood issue of 9/11.

Most people (even after watching the videos) think that the dust was caused by concrete floors crashing down onto one another.

They saw all the dust. They know concrete can get smashed eventually into dust if you work hard at it. They twisted their minds around the gargantuan amount of dust seen rolling down the street, and then said, "Concrete. It's all concrete."

Wrong. That dust was steel, concrete, glass, wood, ceramic and everything inside the building. Almost the entire building was turned into dust, and that dust was a horrible, noxious thing. Unlike any dust you've ever seen before, and certainly unlike concrete (although it is the color of concrete).

I know about the dust because I've seen it with my own eyes and touched it with my own hands. I inhaled the stuff, on accident. I still have some of the dust, too. Pretty shocking, huh? Or are you still not impressed and working on this idea that I must be a fraud because I'm not saying what everyone else is saying.

As far as I know, none of you ever saw the dust in real life. Has anyone?

 

[The Big Dog]

One of the most misunderstood issue of 9/11.

Most people (even after watching the videos) think that the dust was caused by concrete floors crashing down onto one another.

They saw all the dust. They know concrete can get smashed eventually into dust if you work hard at it. They twisted their minds around the gargantuan amount of dust seen rolling down the street, and then said, "Concrete. It's all concrete."

Wrong. That dust was steel, concrete, glass, wood, ceramic and everything inside the building. Almost the entire building was turned into dust, and that dust was a horrible, noxious thing. Unlike any dust you've ever seen before, and certainly unlike concrete (although it is the color of concrete).

I know about the dust because I've seen it with my own eyes and touched it with my own hands. I inhaled the stuff, on accident. I still have some of the dust, too. Pretty shocking, huh? Or are you still not impressed and working on this idea that I must be a fraud because I'm not saying what everyone else is saying.

As far as I know, none of you ever saw the dust in real life. Has anyone?

Cool story bro.

Remember, no one here is from New York. ^^rolls eyes^^

 

[332nd]

One of the most misunderstood issue of 9/11.

Most people (even after watching the videos) think that the dust was caused by concrete floors crashing down onto one another.

They saw all the dust. They know concrete can get smashed eventually into dust if you work hard at it. They twisted their minds around the gargantuan amount of dust seen rolling down the street, and then said, "Concrete. It's all concrete."

Wrong. That dust was steel, concrete, glass, wood, ceramic and everything inside the building. Almost the entire building was turned into dust, and that dust was a horrible, noxious thing. Unlike any dust you've ever seen before, and certainly unlike concrete (although it is the color of concrete).

I know about the dust because I've seen it with my own eyes and touched it with my own hands. I inhaled the stuff, on accident. I still have some of the dust, too. Pretty shocking, huh? Or are you still not impressed and working on this idea that I must be a fraud because I'm not saying what everyone else is saying.

As far as I know, none of you ever saw the dust in real life. Has anyone?

Two questions.

1: Who is saying the dust was all concrete?
2: What is your point?

 

[dtugg]

How was steel turned to dust? Gigantic laser from outer space?

 

[WTC Dust]

Cool story bro.

Remember, no one here is from New York. ^^rolls eyes^^

Being from New York doesn't mean you've examined the WTC dust. Has anyone, other than me?

 

[WTC Dust]

How was steel turned to dust? Gigantic laser from outer space?

Very good question. I'm waiting it out on this one. Dr. Wood says that an "energy weapon" is the likely cause. I prefer to think of it as a "Tesla weapon" or an "electrical weapon", but I could very well be wrong on this.

It certainly wasn't gravity, as the "collapse" model expects you to believe.

 

[Reactor drone]

If most of the steel turned to dust what was all that stuff they shipped off to be recycled?

How magnetic is your dust sample?

 

[WTC Dust]

Two questions.

1: Who is saying the dust was all concrete?
2: What is your point?

"Who"? Um...lotsa people? Do you make the claim that the dust was entirely concrete? I say no, and that is my point. The dust was steel and all the rest of the contents of the WTC buildings, not just the concrete.

 

[GlennB]

Wrong. That dust was steel, concrete, glass, wood, ceramic and everything inside the building. Almost the entire building was turned into dust, .........

I know about the dust because I've seen it with my own eyes and touched it with my own hands. I inhaled the stuff, on accident. I still have some of the dust, too.

A number of studies analysed dust taken from a variety of locations. There was very little iron in it.

This makes sense, as the steel was picked up and shipped out of GZ on lorries in a condition very close to its original.

 

[dtugg]

Being from New York doesn't mean you've examined the WTC dust. Has anyone, other than me?

Who cares? It is not as if you conducted tests and established that there was anything unexpected in the dust (like steel). You just looked at it. So what?

 

[beachnut]

... That dust was steel,...
As far as I know, none of you ever saw the dust in real life. Has anyone?

Steel was turned to dust; nonsense, insane claim.

Some people who post at JREF have seen the dust, and know saying it is steel is insane.

 

[WTC Dust]

If most of the steel turned to dust what was all that stuff they shipped off to be recycled?

How magnetic is your dust sample?

I've never seen any direct evidence that the steel was shipped off to be recycled, only hearsay evidence.

Look at the hole on 9/12, and there isn't actually that much steel. The pile at Ground Zero was shorter than two stories high. I saw this with my own eyes on 9/14/01. The "pile" at Ground Zero was not visible above a ten foot fence from ground level, although a few taller pieces were sticking up.

What was visible was the fumes, and I say the fumes and the dust were different forms of the same thing: the WTC buildings and contents.

 

[dtugg]

Very good question. I'm waiting it out on this one. Dr. Wood says that an "energy weapon" is the likely cause. I prefer to think of it as a "Tesla weapon" or an "electrical weapon", but I could very well be wrong on this.

It certainly wasn't gravity, as the "collapse" model expects you to believe.

So you have proof that a such a weapon exists and can dustify steel, yes?

(Rhetorical question. You, of course have nothing.)

You understand why normal people think that you and Judy Wood are insane, right?

 

[WTC Dust]

Steel was turned to dust; nonsense, insane claim.

Some people who post at JREF have seen the dust, and know saying it is steel is insane.

The dust isn't steel. It used to be steel. And what's so "insane" about that? You can't think of a process that can turn steel into dust? Well, learn something. Can only point you the way. Can't make you go there.

 

[beachnut]

I've never seen any direct evidence that the steel was shipped off to be recycled, only hearsay evidence.

Look at the hole on 9/12, and there isn't actually that much steel. The pile at Ground Zero was shorter than two stories high. I saw this with my own eyes on 9/14/01. The "pile" at Ground Zero was not visible above a ten foot fence from ground level, although a few taller pieces were sticking up.

What was visible was the fumes, and I say the fumes and the dust were different forms of the same thing: the WTC buildings and contents.

Smoke? You left out smoke, it might be your fumes stuff. You are not a research scientist you are a paranoid dustified steel conspiracy theorist.

As a research scientist it is strange you failed to bring evidence, and missed the reports on the dust at the WTC. Very... whatever

 

[GlennB]

The dust isn't steel. It used to be steel. And what's so "insane" about that? You can't think of a process that can turn steel into dust? Well, learn something. Can only point you the way. Can't make you go there.

This steel would still be present in the dust and easily analysed as such. It wasn't. It wasn't there.

 

[WTC Dust]

So you have proof that a such a weapon exists and can dustify steel, yes?

(Rhetorical question. You, of course have nothing.)

You understand why normal people think that you and Judy Wood are insane, right

I do not have definitive proof of any electrical weapon. I have only forensic evidence that rules out gravity and explosives. I haven't even proved an electrical weapon did it, yet, not to mention that I haven't found the exact weapon.

Normal people aren't highly educated and creative, like Dr. Wood and me. Normal people like to watch football and purchase shiny objects. Count me out.

 

[dtugg]

The dust isn't steel. It used to be steel. And what's so "insane" about that? You can't think of a process that can turn steel into dust? Well, learn something. Can only point you the way. Can't make you go there.

If you have proof that a device exists which can turn a couple hundred thousand tons of steel to dust in seconds, go ahead and post it. If not, there is no reason for any sane person to believe it exists.

 

[beachnut]

The dust isn't steel. It used to be steel. And what's so "insane" about that? You can't think of a process that can turn steel into dust? Well, learn something. Can only point you the way. Can't make you go there.

Right the dust used to be steel but now it is not steel, it is dust that is not steel dust. What did Fe turn into, super research scientist? Fe dust, or use to be Fe, now some sort of super not steel but some kind of dust stuff?

Still waiting for the kinetic energy formula. Found it yet?

Book em dano

 

[WTC Dust]

This steel would still be present in the dust and easily analysed as such. It wasn't. It wasn't there.

OK. I tend to believe all the peer reviewed papers that mention the iron that was found in the dust and I'm not talking about Steven Jones' ridiculous non-peer reviewed travesty of a paper, either.

They found iron in the dust. Steel is 98% iron. Where's the question?