Most Important Technology for Allies in WW2

I recall the quote of a captured German general. He was being driven to a POW camp in France and went through an intersection where one black GI was using a bulldozer to fill in shell holes. At the same intersection, he had once seen fifty German soldiers filling in similar holes with shovels. At that moment, he recalled, he knew the war was lost.

There are lots of anecdotes like that. There's a scene from the movie Battle of the Bulge where the German general finds a cake that had been sent over from the states and it's still fresh. He says if they can afford to ship cakes across the ocean, we've lost.
 
If it wasn't for Radar, Britain would have lost the war in 1941, leaving America unable to enter the European conflict and we would all currently be typing in German
;)
 
If it wasn't for Radar, Britain would have lost the war in 1941, leaving America unable to enter the European conflict and we would all currently be typing in German
;)

How did the combat between Germany and Britain develop?
 
If it wasn't for Radar, Britain would have lost the war in 1941, leaving America unable to enter the European conflict and we would all currently be typing in German


Some of our posters *do* type (and speak) in German.



. . . Ooooohhhhhhh
 
My vote goes to this too. Specifically, not only the capacity but also the philosophy: to build things that are "good enough", but are easy to build in vast quantities. Others have already mentioned the vast numbers of Shermans and T-34's that were churned out. Individually, those tanks were no match for the German Tiger, but the numbers produced say all. By comparison, the Germans lost themselves in ever more convoluted designs.

This is something of a myth. It does have a good inkling of truth, but the Sherman is arguably just as gold-plated a design as the German big cats, with its advanced optics, gyroscopically stabilized gun, integral radios in every tank, wet ammo storage in later models, leather padded interiors, etc. It developed an unwarranted reputation of being technologically inferior to the German cats first and foremost from the fact that the U.S. decided to continue producing medium tanks for the logistical benefits and then pitted them against heavies on the defensive, not at all helped by green crews against veterans in bocage country.

The U.S., however, having the most advanced and efficient mass production technology in the world, was able to make complex weapons, and do so in quantity with sufficient quality control that they don't face severe reliability issues. This can be seen in a wide variety of fields, like the Garand rifle: the only semi-auto rifle to see general service, the Packard Merlin: cranking engines out of an assembly line with better fit than the handmade British originals, the laminar flow wings on American fighters, the B-29, or 100+ octane avgas being widely available rather than carefully horded for high performance interceptors.

Less charitably, that the U.S. was able to goldplate its weapons and still outproduce everybody else combined made up for some less than inspired designs. A T-34 or Panther built with American goldplating and quality control would be fearsome indeed. And had the U.S. not poured more resources than the Manhattan project into the B-29, it would have been just as much of a convoluted and overly complex super advanced technological boondoggle as the ones Germany is so renowned for producing.
 
Last edited:
I'd say "radar" as well. The proximity fuse is a miniature radar set.
Radar was also used by convoy escorts and long range aircraft to force German subs underwater (or sink them), where they couldn't accomplish much of anything...
 
I've read that the Germans used horses and mules to move stuff right up to the end of the war. Late in the war when German POWs were being marched back to the rear, they were amazed to see our troops, equipment and supplies heading to the front in trucks and jeeps.

It wasn't just the Western front. The Russians army also moved on six wheeled Studebaker trucks.
 
I'd say "radar" as well. The proximity fuse is a miniature radar set.
Radar was also used by convoy escorts and long range aircraft to force German subs underwater (or sink them), where they couldn't accomplish much of anything...

Radar-equipped carrier patrol aircraft (Airborne Early Warning, "AEW" ) for the navy was a crash project starting late in 1944 and with manufacturing started in early 1945. I'm not sure if it into combat before VJ day.

This was much more than putting radar sets into planes. The returns detected by the patrol planes were sent via radio to the aircraft carrier's CIC and merged with the the returns from the other radar sets for display screen.
 
The cavity magnetron

The techniques of operations research

British inventions, both.
 
Radar-equipped carrier patrol aircraft (Airborne Early Warning, "AEW" ) for the navy was a crash project starting late in 1944 and with manufacturing started in early 1945. I'm not sure if it into combat before VJ day.

This was much more than putting radar sets into planes. The returns detected by the patrol planes were sent via radio to the aircraft carrier's CIC and merged with the the returns from the other radar sets for display screen.

RADAR BULLETIN NO. 2 A
(RADTWO A)
THE TACTICAL USE OF RADAR IN AIRCRAFT
 
Radar-equipped carrier patrol aircraft (Airborne Early Warning, "AEW" ) for the navy was a crash project starting late in 1944 and with manufacturing started in early 1945. I'm not sure if it into combat before VJ day.

This was much more than putting radar sets into planes. The returns detected by the patrol planes were sent via radio to the aircraft carrier's CIC and merged with the the returns from the other radar sets for display screen.

I wasn't thinking of carrier aircraft but of long range (Liberators, for example) aircraft operated by Coastal Command.
And don't forget about eleventyhundred corvettes and frigates and the like: German subs could only track/stalk convoys while surfaced as they were much too slow while submerged. Detect it (even at night, mind you), force it underwater, keep it there for, say, a few hours and you're gone - no luck for Fritz if you haven't killed him anyway.
 
Last edited:
The U.S., however, having the most advanced and efficient mass production technology in the world, was able to make complex weapons, and do so in quantity with sufficient quality control that they don't face severe reliability issues. This can be seen in a wide variety of fields, like the Garand rifle: the only semi-auto rifle to see general service, the Packard Merlin: cranking engines out of an assembly line with better fit than the handmade British originals...


If you're going to mention aircraft engines, then I submit for consideration the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 radial engine, the 2,000+ horsepower package that was rugged, reliable, and powered a number of different U.S. aircraft designs including the F6F Hellcat, P-47 Thunderbolt, F4U Corsair, and B-26 Marauder.
 
Synthetic rubber was very important, especially since the Japanese controlled most of the rubber producing areas.
 
There´s a nice quote by a German tank commander, said to his Allied interrogators: "One of our King Tigers could take five of your Shermans, but you always had six of them."

More accurate would be "Our King Tigers could take five of your Shermans, but they ran out of fuel trying to get to those Shermans."
 
I wonder about obscure, mundane stuff that might go unnoticed. Were there differences between the two sides in what kinds of stuff the average soldier carried while marching from town to town... a gun less likely to jam or needing reloading less often or easier to aim... faster lighter ammo you could carry more of... boots less likely to cause blisters or infections... better preserved food or food containers making them less dependent on new supplies... better camouflage... more or better radios to make them better at coordinating with other units and aircraft... better binoculars or telescopes...? But I've never heard any such differences being discussed.

There were quite a few:

The American Helmet was the best for the war. Other nations wore helmets dating from WW1, some eventually adapted but in Germany's case Hitler forbade any changes as he thought the "coal scuttle" was a major source of identity for the German soldier.

German optics were incredibly superior throughout the war. The US, and most allied nations looked upon binoculars and such as items to be used ,broken and replaced. The Axis looked upon them as critical items. This showed when Germany shared their industrial methods with Japan and meant that submarine hunting could be tricky. Those huge binoculars could see the hunter planes far enough away for the sub to dive and get to safety.

In Europe, German and American soldiers thought the other side's rations were better than their own food.

American (and by extension a lot of the Allies) rifle gunpowder was more prone to making bigger flashes at night, meaning it was easier to spot where the shooter was. The brightness of the powder was enough to help daytime spotting.

There are plenty more, but that is a few to chew on.
 
German tank technology, without it the allies would have been screwed
 
Blood transfusions. If a German lost of lot of blood then he probably was dead. A British or American would get a blood transfusion.
Was this due to lack of technology for it, or unwillingness to use it?

If you're going to mention aircraft engines, then I submit for consideration the Pratt & Whitney R-2800 radial engine, the 2,000+ horsepower package that was rugged, reliable, and powered a number of different U.S. aircraft designs including the F6F Hellcat, P-47 Thunderbolt, F4U Corsair, and B-26 Marauder.
That would seem to have been one of our disadvantages that we one in spite of, not because of. I've seen former German pilots talking in interviews about using a dogfighting technique of first climbing above an enemy plane and then diving back at it because they knew that Allied planes didn't have the engine power to climb like they could. And the Thach Weave that someone else mentioned before was explicitly designed to overcome enemy planes' superior climb rates and turning rates.
 

Back
Top Bottom